Shelef Assaf, Mashiah Moty, Schumacher Ilana, Shine Ofir, Baruch Yehuda
Abarbanel Mental Health Center, Bat-Yam and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Harefuah. 2011 Dec;150(12):913-7, 935, 934.
Over the past several years, there is an increased demand and use of medical grade cannabis (MGC) in Israel and around the world. Regulation of cannabis growth, use and distribution has been a subject for many discussions in the Israeli medical system, parliament and the media. The increased demand for this kind of treatment, which is considered to be safe and effective in various indications, caused increased interest in the MGC approval mechanisms. Some countries have created regulation and control mechanisms for MGC. The United Nation convention of 1961 defines the medical legal use of narcotic substances. The convention demands full governmental control of the stock of narcotic substances, including cannabis and a governmental mechanism which will license, supervise, control, document and report the yield and consumption. In the Netherlands there is full accordance with the United Nations requirements and there is a special office for MGC which approves growth, production and marketing. MGC is prescribed in the Netherlands and supplied by a pharmacist as a regular drug. In Canada, after a long legal struggle, patients pressured the government to begin a federal program of MGC. In the U.S.A there are differences in cannabis authorization policy between some of the states and the federal government, which opposes MGC use and therefore, places numerous obstacles. Currently in Israel, the Director General of the Ministry of Health, appoints a representative to certify MGC and approve marijuana growers. MGC is directly supplied by the marijuana growers. This is a problematic model which lacks separation between the growers and the patients. Another problem is that the United Nations requirements are not fulfilled. In this review we present the advantages and drawbacks of the current model and propositions for future models for control and regulation of MGC.
在过去几年中,以色列乃至全球对医用大麻(MGC)的需求和使用都有所增加。大麻的种植、使用和分销监管一直是以色列医疗系统、议会和媒体诸多讨论的主题。这种被认为在各种适应症中安全有效的治疗方式需求增加,引发了人们对MGC审批机制的更多关注。一些国家已经建立了MGC的监管机制。1961年的《联合国公约》对麻醉药品的医疗合法用途进行了定义。该公约要求政府全面控制麻醉药品库存,包括大麻,并建立一个政府机制,对产量和消费进行许可、监督、控制、记录和报告。在荷兰,完全符合联合国的要求,设有一个专门的MGC办公室,负责批准种植、生产和销售。在荷兰,MGC由药剂师作为常规药物开具和供应。在加拿大,经过长期的法律斗争,患者向政府施压,促使其启动了一项MGC联邦计划。在美国,一些州和联邦政府在大麻授权政策上存在差异,联邦政府反对使用MGC,因此设置了诸多障碍。目前在以色列,卫生部总干事任命一名代表来认证MGC并批准大麻种植者。MGC由大麻种植者直接供应。这是一个存在问题的模式,种植者和患者之间缺乏区分。另一个问题是未满足联合国的要求。在本综述中,我们阐述了当前模式的优缺点以及未来MGC控制和监管模式的建议。