Suppr超能文献

利用危害指数对香烟烟雾成分进行理论评估。

Use of hazard indices for a theoretical evaluation of cigarette smoke composition.

机构信息

Toxicology Consultant, Ueberhoefer Feld 36a, 51503 Roesrath, Germany.

出版信息

Chem Res Toxicol. 2012 Apr 16;25(4):794-810. doi: 10.1021/tx200536w. Epub 2012 Feb 22.

Abstract

The chemical composition of cigarette mainstream smoke (MS) has been quantitatively analyzed in multiple studies, often with the objective to toxicologically evaluate and compare various types of MS. Increases and decreases in yields of constituents between MS types can only be consolidated if these yields are compared on the basis of toxicological properties of the individual constituents. For the risk assessment of various complex mixtures including MS, a hazard index (HI) approach has been used that requires weighing of the exposure to individual MS constituents by cancer and noncancer potency values. The objective of the current study is to review the past uses of the HI concept for MS and smokeless tobacco and discuss strengths and limitations of using this concept. Published information as well as information made available on the Web was used. The HI concept has been applied to MS for determining and comparing theoretical lifetime risks, for consumer communication, for the prioritization of constituents for reduction, for ingredient assessment, and for the selection of constituents for regulation. The limitations of this approach are associated with the limited number of MS constituents with available yield data, the gaps and uncertainties in available potency values, the application to relatively high exposure concentrations, and the default assumption of additivity. The derived theoretical noncancer index is dominated by acrolein to an extent that there seems to be not much advantage in using the HI concept for noncancer assessments. The derived theoretical cancer index is dominated by genotoxic carcinogens of the MS vapor phase and may thus complement currently used toxicological assays in a tiered evaluation approach. As is the case for every other assay and interpretation model, the HI concept needs to be applied with its limitations and weaknesses in mind. Its best application is for comparative purposes. It should be kept in mind that the HI concept is a theoretical concept and does not provide actual risk information.

摘要

香烟主流烟雾(MS)的化学成分已在多项研究中进行了定量分析,通常目的是对各种类型的 MS 进行毒理学评估和比较。只有在基于单个成分的毒理学特性比较产量的情况下,才能综合 MS 类型之间成分产量的增加和减少。对于包括 MS 在内的各种复杂混合物的风险评估,已经使用了危害指数(HI)方法,该方法要求根据个别 MS 成分的致癌和非致癌效力值来衡量对其的暴露。本研究的目的是回顾过去使用 HI 概念来评估 MS 和无烟烟草的情况,并讨论使用该概念的优缺点。使用了已发表的信息以及网络上提供的信息。HI 概念已应用于 MS,以确定和比较理论终生风险,用于消费者沟通,为减少成分确定优先级,用于成分评估以及用于选择受监管的成分。该方法的局限性与具有可用产量数据的 MS 成分数量有限,可用效力值的差距和不确定性,应用于相对较高的暴露浓度以及默认的加性假设有关。得出的理论非癌症指数主要由丙烯醛主导,因此在非癌症评估中使用 HI 概念似乎没有太大优势。得出的理论癌症指数主要由 MS 气相中的遗传毒性致癌物主导,因此可能会在分层评估方法中补充当前使用的毒理学测定。与其他任何测定和解释模型一样,需要考虑 HI 概念的局限性和弱点来应用该概念。它的最佳应用是为了比较目的。需要记住的是,HI 概念是一个理论概念,它不提供实际风险信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验