Suppr超能文献

冲突监测与解决:两种语言是否优于一种?来自反应时和事件相关脑电位的证据。

Conflict monitoring and resolution: are two languages better than one? Evidence from reaction time and event-related brain potentials.

机构信息

Department of Psychology/Centre for Research in Human Development, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke St. West Montreal, Quebec, Canada H4B 1R6.

出版信息

Brain Res. 2012 Mar 29;1446:71-90. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.052. Epub 2012 Jan 28.

Abstract

An advantage for bilingual relative to monolingual young adults has been found for cognitive control tasks, although this finding is not consistent in the literature. The present investigation further examined this advantage using three tasks previously found to be sensitive to the effect. Furthermore, both behavioral and event-related brain potential (ERP) measures were included. Monolingual (n=25) and highly proficient bilingual (n=26) young adults completed a Stroop, Simon, and Eriksen flanker task while electrophysiological recording took place. Behaviorally there were no language group differences on any of the tasks. The ERP measures demonstrated differences between monolinguals and bilinguals with respect to conflict monitoring, resource allocation, stimulus categorization, and error-processing; however, these differences were not consistent across tasks. Given the similar behavioral performance across the groups the observed differences in brain responses may not represent an advantage for bilinguals. The results are discussed with respect to previous findings.

摘要

双语者相对于单语者在认知控制任务上具有优势,尽管这一发现并不在文献中一致。本研究进一步使用之前发现对该效应敏感的三项任务来检验这一优势。此外,同时包括了行为和事件相关脑电位(ERP)测量。单语者(n=25)和高度熟练的双语者(n=26)年轻人在进行电生理记录的同时完成了 Stroop、Simon 和 Eriksen 侧翼任务。在行为方面,两组在任何任务上都没有语言差异。ERP 测量在冲突监测、资源分配、刺激分类和错误处理方面显示了单语者和双语者之间的差异;然而,这些差异在任务之间并不一致。考虑到各组的行为表现相似,观察到的大脑反应差异可能并不代表双语者的优势。结果将根据以前的发现进行讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验