Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, P.O.Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Fam Cancer. 2012 Sep;11(3):337-41. doi: 10.1007/s10689-012-9517-7.
Lynch gene carriers undergo regular surveillance colonoscopies. Polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution (PEG) is routinely prescribed for bowel cleansing, but often poorly tolerated by patients. Sodium phosphate (NaP) may be an alternative. Prospective and random comparison of bowel preparation with PEG and NaP on colon cleansing and patients' acceptance. Patients, who previously underwent a colonoscopy, were invited to participate and randomly assigned to either PEG or NaP. They were asked to fill in a questionnaire about preparation tolerability and future preferences. The endoscopist filled out a report about the quality of colon cleansing. 125 Patients were included in the study. Nine (7%) were excluded because of missing data. The remaining 116 patients (53 PEG and 63 NaP) were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. Before colonoscopy 20 (38%) patients using PEG experienced the preparation almost intolerable, in contrast to 7(11%) of those using NaP (P = 0.001). Eleven patients in the PEG group and 48 in the NaP group would prefer NaP in the future. The colonoscopy was poorly tolerated in 17% of the individuals in both groups (P = 0.963). The endoscopist observed a more than 75% clean colon in 83% of patients on PEG and in 71% of patients on NaP (P = 0.076), however the coecum (P = 0.025) and ascending colon was cleaner after PEG. Lynch patients tolerated NaP better and preferred this formula for future bowel preparation. Colon cleansing was suboptimal with both treatments with a tendency towards a cleaner proximal colon with PEG.
林奇基因携带者定期接受结肠镜检查。聚乙二醇电解质溶液(PEG)通常被规定用于肠道清洁,但患者往往难以耐受。磷酸钠(NaP)可能是一种替代方法。前瞻性和随机比较 PEG 和 NaP 对肠道清洁和患者接受度的影响。先前接受过结肠镜检查的患者被邀请参加,并随机分配到 PEG 或 NaP 组。他们被要求填写一份关于准备耐受性和未来偏好的问卷。内镜医生填写了一份关于结肠清洁质量的报告。共有 125 名患者参与了这项研究。9 名(7%)因数据缺失而被排除在外。其余 116 名患者(53 名 PEG 和 63 名 NaP)被纳入分析。两组间基线特征无差异。在结肠镜检查前,20 名(38%)使用 PEG 的患者认为准备过程几乎无法忍受,而使用 NaP 的患者中只有 7 名(11%)(P = 0.001)。在 PEG 组中有 11 名患者和 NaP 组中有 48 名患者将来会更喜欢 NaP。两组中各有 17%的患者对结肠镜检查不耐受(P = 0.963)。内镜医生观察到 83%使用 PEG 的患者和 71%使用 NaP 的患者的结肠清洁度超过 75%(P = 0.076),但乙状结肠(P = 0.025)和升结肠的清洁度在使用 PEG 后更高。林奇综合征患者对 NaP 的耐受性更好,并更喜欢这种配方用于未来的肠道准备。两种治疗方法的结肠清洁效果都不理想,PEG 对近端结肠的清洁效果有改善趋势。