• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并无保护左主干病变患者行急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的早期及中期临床疗效。

Early and mid-term clinical outcome of emergency PCI in patients with STEMI due to unprotected left main coronary artery disease.

机构信息

UO Cardiologia Interventistica, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini, Roma, Italy.

出版信息

J Interv Cardiol. 2012 Jun;25(3):215-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00712.x. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00712.x
PMID:22360543
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Evaluation of acute and mid-term outcomes of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing emergency PCI due to unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease.

BACKGROUND

STEMI patients due to ULMCA disease represent a rare, high risk group. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may be the preferred strategy of myocardial revascularization but there are few data about this topic.

METHODS

We analyzed 30-day and mid-term mortality of 58 patients with STEMI and ULMCA disease as culprit lesion treated in our centre by emergency PCI between 2000 to 2010.

RESULTS

Mean age was 67.3 ± 11.5 years. Thirty (51.7%) patients had cardiogenic shock on admission. PCI success was achieved in 54 patients (93.1%). Mean follow-up was 15.8 ± 10.9 months (median 14, range 6-45). Thirty-day and mid-term mortality rates were 39.7% and 44%. Backward binary logistic regression model identified cardiogenic shock at presentation (OR 12.6, 95% CI 2.97-53.6, P < 0.001), age ≥75 years (OR 5.9, 95% CI 1.3-26.5, P = 0.019) and post-PCI TIMI flow grade <3 (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.8-5.7 P = 0.02) as independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) identified shock at presentation (HR 5.2, 95% CI 1.8-14.3, P < 0.002), age ≥75 years (HR 3.9, 95% CI 1.8-8.7, P < 0.001), post-PCI TIMI flow grade <3 (HR 4.9, 95% CI 1.6-14.6; P < 0.005) as independent predictors of mid-term mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with STEMI and ULMCA as culprit lesion, emergency PCI is a valuable therapeutic strategy. Early and mid-term survival depends on cardiogenic shock, advanced age, and PCI failure. Patients surviving the first month have good mid-term prognosis.

摘要

目的

评估因无保护左主干冠状动脉(ULMCA)病变而行急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的急性和中期结局。

背景

因 ULMCA 病变导致的 STEMI 患者属于罕见的高危人群。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)可能是心肌血运重建的首选策略,但关于这一主题的数据很少。

方法

我们分析了 2000 年至 2010 年间在我们中心因 ULMCA 病变作为罪犯病变而行急诊 PCI 的 58 例 STEMI 患者的 30 天和中期死亡率。

结果

平均年龄为 67.3 ± 11.5 岁。30 例(51.7%)患者入院时存在心源性休克。54 例(93.1%)患者的 PCI 获得成功。平均随访时间为 15.8 ± 10.9 个月(中位数为 14 个月,范围为 6-45 个月)。30 天和中期死亡率分别为 39.7%和 44%。

向后二元逻辑回归模型确定入院时的心源性休克(OR 12.6,95%CI 2.97-53.6,P < 0.001)、年龄≥75 岁(OR 5.9,95%CI 1.3-26.5,P = 0.019)和 PCI 后 TIMI 血流分级<3(OR 2.9,95%CI 1.8-5.7,P = 0.02)为 30 天死亡率的独立预测因子。Cox 比例风险比(HR)确定入院时的休克(HR 5.2,95%CI 1.8-14.3,P < 0.002)、年龄≥75 岁(HR 3.9,95%CI 1.8-8.7,P < 0.001)、PCI 后 TIMI 血流分级<3(HR 4.9,95%CI 1.6-14.6;P < 0.005)为中期死亡率的独立预测因子。

结论

对于因 ULMCA 病变为罪犯病变而行急诊 PCI 的 STEMI 患者,急诊 PCI 是一种有价值的治疗策略。早期和中期生存率取决于心源性休克、高龄和 PCI 失败。存活至第一个月的患者具有良好的中期预后。

相似文献

1
Early and mid-term clinical outcome of emergency PCI in patients with STEMI due to unprotected left main coronary artery disease.急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并无保护左主干病变患者行急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的早期及中期临床疗效。
J Interv Cardiol. 2012 Jun;25(3):215-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00712.x. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
2
Multicenter international registry of unprotected left main coronary artery percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents in patients with myocardial infarction.心肌梗死患者使用药物洗脱支架行无保护左主干冠状动脉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的多中心国际注册研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jan 1;73(1):15-21. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21712.
3
Percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery disease as culprit lesion in patients with acute myocardial infarction.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死患者非罪犯性左主干冠状动脉病变。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jun;4(6):618-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.02.016.
4
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗开口/中段病变与无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结局:DELTA 注册研究(左主干冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架):一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005.
5
Single or multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的单支或多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Dec 1;72(7):927-33. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21722.
6
Clinical outcomes after PCI for acute coronary syndrome in unprotected left main coronary artery disease: insights from the Swiss Acute Left Main Coronary Vessel Percutaneous Management (SALVage) study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病急性冠状动脉综合征的临床结局:来自瑞士急性左主干冠状动脉血管经皮管理(SALVage)研究的结果。
EuroIntervention. 2011 Oct 30;7(6):697-704. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I6A112.
7
Clinical significance of post-procedural TIMI flow in patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后 TIMI 血流对心原性休克患者的临床意义。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jan;2(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.10.006.
8
Primary angioplasty in ST-elevation myocardial infarction due to unprotected left-main coronary disease in a high-volume catheterization center without on-site surgery facilities: immediate and medium-term outcome: the STEMI-Placet Registry.在无现场手术设施的高容量导管插入中心,对因无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病导致的ST段抬高型心肌梗死进行直接血管成形术:近期和中期结果:STEMI-Placet注册研究
J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Dec;24(12):645-9.
9
In-hospital outcomes of emergent and elective percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians.八旬老人急诊和择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的院内结局
Coron Artery Dis. 2009 Mar;20(2):118-23. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283292ae1.
10
Long-term outcome in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease treated with culprit-only, immediate, or staged multivessel percutaneous revascularization strategies: Insights from the REAL registry.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者采用仅处理罪犯血管、即刻或分期多支血管经皮血管重建策略的长期预后:来自REAL注册研究的见解
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Nov 15;84(6):912-22. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25374. Epub 2014 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Cardiogenic Shock Secondary to Total Occlusive Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Lesion-Related Acute Myocardial Infarction.继发于完全闭塞性无保护左主干冠状动脉病变相关急性心肌梗死的心源性休克患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的临床结局
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 7;12(4):1311. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041311.
2
Cardiogenic shock due to left main related myocardial infarction: is revascularization enough?左主干相关心肌梗死所致心源性休克:血运重建是否足够?
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2022 Feb 28;19(2):152-157. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.02.005.
3
Hanging by a thread-urgent coronary artery bypass grafting for ST elevation myocardial infarction in a patient with isolated left main coronary artery disease.
命悬一线——为孤立性左主干冠状动脉疾病患者的ST段抬高型心肌梗死紧急行冠状动脉搭桥术
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2020 May 14;33(3):457-459. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2020.1759338. eCollection 2020 Jul.
4
Predictors of survival following veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with acute myocardial infarction-related refractory cardiogenic shock: clinical and coronary angiographic factors.急性心肌梗死相关难治性心源性休克患者静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合术后生存的预测因素:临床及冠状动脉造影因素
J Thorac Dis. 2020 May;12(5):2507-2516. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.03.51.
5
New Predictors of Early and Late Outcomes after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Culprit Lesion.无保护左主干罪犯病变的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后早期和晚期结局的新预测因素。
J Interv Cardiol. 2019 Mar 18;2019:8238972. doi: 10.1155/2019/8238972. eCollection 2019.
6
Does stress hyperglycemia affect mortality? Acute myocardial infarction - case control study.应激性高血糖是否影响死亡率?急性心肌梗死——病例对照研究。
Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis. 2019 Aug 14;4:e201-e207. doi: 10.5114/amsad.2019.87303. eCollection 2019.
7
Long-term prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction due to unprotected left main coronary artery disease: a single-centre experience over 14 years.无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病所致急性心肌梗死患者的长期预后:一项14年的单中心经验
Singapore Med J. 2016 Jul;57(7):396-400. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2016121.