Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.
Aging Ment Health. 2012;16(5):603-7. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2011.653955. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
We aimed to investigate quality of life ratings among people with varying severity of dementia and their carers, recruited in general hospital.
We recruited 109 people with dementia, and their proxies (carers), from psychiatric referrals of inpatients in two general hospitals in England. From patients, we gathered data on quality of life (QoL-AD and EQ5-D) and depressive symptoms, and from proxies we gathered data on patient quality of life (Proxy QoL-AD and EQ5-D), severity of dementia, activities of daily living, physical illness and depressive symptoms, and on carer stress.
Completion rates for both measures were progressively lower with increasing dementia severity. Patients rated their quality of life more highly than proxies on Qol-AD (patients=32.2, CI=30.7-33.7, proxies=24.7, CI=23.8-26.0, p<0.001) and on EQ5D (patients=0.71, CI=0.64-0.77, proxies=0.30, CI=0.22-0.38, p<0.001). For proxy EQ5D, impaired instrumental ADLs (p=0.003) and more severe dementia (p=0.019) were associated with ratings, while for proxy QoL-AD, only more severe dementia (p=0.039) was associated with ratings. Lower patient EQ-5D scores were independently associated only with carer stress (p=0.01). Lower patient QoL-AD scores were associated with patient depression (p=0.001), impaired activities of daily living (p=0.02) and proxy psychiatric symptoms (p=0.002).
Among patients with moderate to severe dementia in general hospital, proxy measures of quality of life are the only practical option. Patients and proxies appear to have very different concepts of quality of life in dementia.
我们旨在调查在综合医院招募的不同严重程度痴呆症患者及其照料者的生活质量评分。
我们招募了 109 名来自英格兰两家综合医院精神科转介的痴呆症患者及其代理人(照料者)。从患者收集生活质量(QoL-AD 和 EQ5-D)和抑郁症状的数据,从代理人收集患者生活质量(Proxy QoL-AD 和 EQ5-D)、痴呆症严重程度、日常生活活动、躯体疾病和抑郁症状以及照料者压力的数据。
随着痴呆症严重程度的增加,两种测量方法的完成率逐渐降低。患者对生活质量的评价高于代理人,在 QoL-AD(患者=32.2,CI=30.7-33.7,代理人=24.7,CI=23.8-26.0,p<0.001)和 EQ5D(患者=0.71,CI=0.64-0.77,代理人=0.30,CI=0.22-0.38,p<0.001)上。对于代理 EQ5D,受损的工具性日常生活活动(p=0.003)和更严重的痴呆症(p=0.019)与评分相关,而对于代理 QoL-AD,只有更严重的痴呆症(p=0.039)与评分相关。仅患者的 EQ-5D 评分较低与照料者压力相关(p=0.01)。患者 QoL-AD 评分较低与患者抑郁(p=0.001)、日常生活活动受损(p=0.02)和代理精神症状(p=0.002)相关。
在综合医院中度至重度痴呆症患者中,代理生活质量测量是唯一可行的选择。痴呆症患者和代理人对生活质量的概念似乎存在很大差异。