Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital of Well Cornel Medical College, USA.
Clin Imaging. 2012 Mar-Apr;36(2):135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2011.11.014.
To prospectively assess the stiffness of the liver and spleen with acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging pre and post transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement.
Between February, 2011 and September, 2011, we prospectively measured stiffness of the liver and spleen with mean shear wave velocity (MSV, m/s) on ARFI imaging in 10 healthy volunteers (mean age 32.2 ± 10.3 years, age range 23-53 years) and 10 patients (mean age, 38.6 ± 6.4 years, age range 30-48 years) who underwent TIPS placement for treatment of portal hypertension (PHTN). The portal vein pressure was measured while placing the TIPS. To assess the changes in the stiffness of the liver and spleen following TIPS placement, we measured MSV of the liver and spleen one day before TIPS insertion and 4-9 days after TIPS placement (mean interval 5.9 ± 2.0 days, interval range 5 to 10 days).
There was significant difference in portal vein pressure pre (27.67 ± 5.86 mmHg) and post (18.00 ± 6.93 mmHg) TIPS insertion (P<.01). The MSV of the liver in healthy subjects, patients with PHTN pre TIPS and patients with PHTN post TIPS measured 1.16 ± 0.06 m/s, 2.48 ± 0.39 m/s, and 2.37 ± 0.28 m/s, respectively. The MSV of the spleen in healthy subjects, patients with PHTN pre TIPS and patients with PHTN post TIPS measured 2.22 ± 0.22 m/s, 3.65 ± 0.32 m/s, and 3.27 ± 0.30 m/s, respectively. There were significant differences in MSV of the liver and spleen between healthy subjects and patients with PHTN (all P<.001). There was no significant difference in MSV of the liver pre and post TIPS placement (P>.05). However, a statistically significant difference in MSV of the spleen pre and Post TIPS placement (P<.001) was demonstrated. In addition, we observed a significant difference in spleen index between healthy subjects and patients with PHTN (P<.001), as well as between pre and post TIPS placement (P<.01).
The MSV of the spleen measured with ARFI correlates well with portal vein pressure. Hence, the spleen stiffness by means of MSV on ARFI imaging can be used as a quantitative marker in monitoring the portal vein pressure as the function of the TIPS.
前瞻性评估经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)前后声辐射力脉冲(ARFI)成像技术测量肝脏和脾脏硬度的变化。
2011 年 2 月至 2011 年 9 月,我们前瞻性地测量了 10 名健康志愿者(平均年龄 32.2±10.3 岁,年龄范围 23-53 岁)和 10 名因门静脉高压(PHTN)接受 TIPS 治疗的患者(平均年龄 38.6±6.4 岁,年龄范围 30-48 岁)的肝脏和脾脏的平均剪切波速度(MSV,m/s),以评估 TIPS 治疗后肝脏和脾脏硬度的变化。在放置 TIPS 时测量门静脉压力。为了评估 TIPS 放置后肝脏和脾脏硬度的变化,我们在 TIPS 插入前 1 天和 TIPS 放置后 4-9 天(平均间隔 5.9±2.0 天,间隔范围 5-10 天)测量肝脏和脾脏的 MSV。
TIPS 前后门静脉压力有显著差异(术前 27.67±5.86mmHg,术后 18.00±6.93mmHg,P<.01)。健康受试者、TIPS 术前 PHTN 患者和 TIPS 术后 PHTN 患者的肝脏 MSV 分别为 1.16±0.06m/s、2.48±0.39m/s 和 2.37±0.28m/s。健康受试者、TIPS 术前 PHTN 患者和 TIPS 术后 PHTN 患者的脾脏 MSV 分别为 2.22±0.22m/s、3.65±0.32m/s 和 3.27±0.30m/s。健康受试者与 PHTN 患者的肝脏和脾脏 MSV 均有显著差异(均 P<.001)。TIPS 前后肝脏 MSV 无显著差异(P>.05)。然而,TIPS 前后脾脏 MSV 有显著差异(P<.001)。此外,我们还观察到健康受试者与 PHTN 患者的脾脏指数有显著差异(P<.001),以及 TIPS 前后的差异(P<.01)。
ARFI 测量的脾脏 MSV 与门静脉压力密切相关。因此,ARFI 成像上的脾脏 MSV 可作为 TIPS 治疗门静脉高压的定量标志物。