• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MT/V5区域神经活动所预测的运动干扰方面的个体差异。

Individual differences in distraction by motion predicted by neural activity in MT/V5.

作者信息

Lechak Jennifer R, Leber Andrew B

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire, Durham NH, USA.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Feb 15;6:12. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00012. eCollection 2011 Nov 21.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00012
PMID:22375110
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3279707/
Abstract

Individuals differ substantially in their susceptibility to distraction by irrelevant visual information. Previous research has uncovered how individual variability in the goal-driven component of attentional control influences distraction, yet it remains unknown whether other sources of variability between individuals also predict distraction. In this fMRI study, we showed that an individual's inherent sensitivity to passively viewed visual motion predicts his/her susceptibility to distraction by motion. Bilateral MT/V5 was localized in participants during passive viewing of moving stimuli, affording a baseline measure of motion sensitivity. Next, participants performed a visual search task with an irrelevant motion singleton distractor, and both behavioral and neural indices of distraction were recorded. Results revealed that both of these indices were predicted by the independent index of motion sensitivity. An additional analysis of moment-to-moment fluctuations in distraction within individuals revealed that distraction could be predicted by pretrial fMRI activity in several brain regions, including MT+, which likely reflected the observer's momentary propensity to process motion. Together, these results shed light on how variability in factors other than goal-driven processing, both within and between individuals, affects attentional control and one's perception of the visual world.

摘要

个体在受到无关视觉信息干扰的易感性方面存在很大差异。先前的研究已经揭示了注意力控制的目标驱动成分中的个体差异是如何影响干扰的,但个体之间其他差异来源是否也能预测干扰仍不清楚。在这项功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究中,我们发现个体对被动观看的视觉运动的固有敏感性可以预测其受运动干扰的易感性。在参与者被动观看移动刺激时,对双侧MT/V5进行了定位,从而获得了运动敏感性的基线测量值。接下来,参与者执行一项带有无关运动单独干扰物的视觉搜索任务,并记录了干扰的行为和神经指标。结果显示,这两个指标均由运动敏感性的独立指标预测。对个体内部干扰的瞬间波动进行的额外分析表明,干扰可以通过包括MT+在内的几个脑区的fMRI活动进行预测,这可能反映了观察者处理运动的瞬间倾向。总之,这些结果揭示了除目标驱动加工之外,个体内部和个体之间的其他因素的变异性是如何影响注意力控制以及个体对视觉世界的感知的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ef2/3279707/a7cd5da441d2/fnhum-06-00012-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ef2/3279707/7a6fa78b0657/fnhum-06-00012-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ef2/3279707/c9c1a5389731/fnhum-06-00012-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ef2/3279707/4d3b5eb6a031/fnhum-06-00012-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ef2/3279707/a7cd5da441d2/fnhum-06-00012-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ef2/3279707/7a6fa78b0657/fnhum-06-00012-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ef2/3279707/c9c1a5389731/fnhum-06-00012-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ef2/3279707/4d3b5eb6a031/fnhum-06-00012-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ef2/3279707/a7cd5da441d2/fnhum-06-00012-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Individual differences in distraction by motion predicted by neural activity in MT/V5.MT/V5区域神经活动所预测的运动干扰方面的个体差异。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Feb 15;6:12. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00012. eCollection 2011 Nov 21.
2
Neural predictors of within-subject fluctuations in attentional control.注意控制内个体波动的神经预测因子。
J Neurosci. 2010 Aug 25;30(34):11458-65. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0809-10.2010.
3
Motion sickness increases functional connectivity between visual motion and nausea-associated brain regions.晕动病会增加视觉运动与恶心相关脑区之间的功能连接。
Auton Neurosci. 2017 Jan;202:108-113. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
4
MT+/V5 activation without conscious motion perception: a high-field fMRI study.无有意识运动感知的MT+/V5激活:一项高场功能磁共振成像研究
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2005;4(2):69-74. doi: 10.2463/mrms.4.69.
5
Brain systems underlying attentional control and emotional distraction during working memory encoding.工作记忆编码过程中注意力控制和情绪分心的大脑系统。
Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 15;87:276-86. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.048. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
6
Neural basis of visual distraction.视觉干扰的神经基础。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Aug;22(8):1794-807. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21325.
7
Cortical fMRI activation produced by attentive tracking of moving targets.对移动目标进行注意力追踪所产生的皮质功能磁共振成像激活。
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Nov;80(5):2657-70. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.5.2657.
8
Intrinsic functional connectivity predicts individual differences in distractibility.内在功能连接性可预测注意力分散性的个体差异。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Jun;86:176-82. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.04.023. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
9
An fMRI study of coherent visual motion processing in children and adults.一项 fMRI 研究:儿童与成人对连贯视觉运动的处理
Neuroimage. 2018 Jun;173:223-239. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
10
Eye behavior predicts susceptibility to visual distraction during internally directed cognition.眼睛行为预示着在内部导向认知过程中对视觉干扰的易感性。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Oct;82(7):3432-3444. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02068-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Bright-light distractions and visual performance.强光干扰与视觉表现。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 25;14:1088975. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1088975. eCollection 2023.
2
Body-mind relaxation meditation modulates the thalamocortical functional connectivity in major depressive disorder: a preliminary resting-state fMRI study.身心放松冥想调节重性抑郁障碍的丘脑-皮质功能连接:一项初步的静息态 fMRI 研究。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 23;11(1):546. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01637-8.
3
Altered Functional Connectivity in the Resting State Neostriatum After Complete Sleep Deprivation: Impairment of Motor Control and Regulatory Network.

本文引用的文献

1
Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.在个体内设计中使用置信区间。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Dec;1(4):476-90. doi: 10.3758/BF03210951.
2
Are the same attentional mechanisms used to detect visual search targets defined by color, orientation, and motion?是否使用相同的注意力机制来检测由颜色、方向和运动定义的视觉搜索目标?
J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Mar;9(2):238-53. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.2.238.
3
The functional link between area MT neural fluctuations and detection of a brief motion stimulus.区 MT 神经元活动的功能联系与短暂运动刺激的检测。
完全睡眠剥夺后静息状态新纹状体功能连接的改变:运动控制和调节网络的损伤
Front Neurosci. 2021 Aug 17;15:665687. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.665687. eCollection 2021.
4
Frontal Eye Field Involvement in Color and Motion Feature-Based Attention: Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.额眼区在基于颜色和运动特征的注意力中的作用:单脉冲经颅磁刺激
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Oct 1;12:390. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00390. eCollection 2018.
5
Object-based selection modulates top-down attentional shifts.基于对象的选择调节自上而下的注意转移。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Feb 21;8:90. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00090. eCollection 2014.
6
A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection.一种基于价值驱动的注意选择机制。
J Vis. 2013 Apr 15;13(3):7. doi: 10.1167/13.3.7.
7
The role of areas MT+/V5 and SPOC in spatial and temporal control of manual interception: an rTMS study.MT+/V5区和SPOC在手动拦截的空间和时间控制中的作用:一项重复经颅磁刺激研究
Front Behav Neurosci. 2013 Mar 5;7:15. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00015. eCollection 2013.
J Neurosci. 2011 Sep 21;31(38):13458-68. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1347-11.2011.
4
Distractibility in daily life is reflected in the structure and function of human parietal cortex.日常生活中的注意力分散反映在人类顶叶皮层的结构和功能上。
J Neurosci. 2011 May 4;31(18):6620-6. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5864-10.2011.
5
Individual differences in recovery time from attentional capture.注意捕获恢复时间的个体差异。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Mar;22(3):361-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797611398493. Epub 2011 Feb 10.
6
No commonality between attentional capture and attentional blink.注意捕获和注意瞬脱之间没有共性。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 May;64(5):991-1008. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.524304. Epub 2010 Nov 26.
7
Neural predictors of within-subject fluctuations in attentional control.注意控制内个体波动的神经预测因子。
J Neurosci. 2010 Aug 25;30(34):11458-65. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0809-10.2010.
8
Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection.视觉选择的自上而下和自下而上控制。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):77-99. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 May 26.
9
Human variation in overriding attentional capture.人类在优势注意捕获方面的个体差异。
J Neurosci. 2009 Jul 8;29(27):8726-33. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2145-09.2009.
10
The Neural Basis of Selective Attention: Cortical Sources and Targets of Attentional Modulation.选择性注意的神经基础:注意调制的皮层源与靶点。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2008;17(2):86-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00554.x.