Suppr超能文献

人为变化的类型如何改变生态陷阱的后果。

How the type of anthropogenic change alters the consequences of ecological traps.

机构信息

Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0430, USA.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Jul 7;279(1738):2546-52. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.0139. Epub 2012 Feb 29.

Abstract

Understanding altered ecological and evolutionary dynamics in novel environments is vital for predicting species responses to rapid environmental change. One fundamental concept relevant to such dynamics is the ecological trap, which arises from rapid anthropogenic change and can facilitate extinction. Ecological traps occur when formerly adaptive habitat preferences become maladaptive because the cues individuals preferentially use in selecting habitats lead to lower fitness than other alternatives. While it has been emphasized that traps can arise from different types of anthropogenic change, the resulting consequences of these different types of traps remain unknown. Using a novel model framework that builds upon the Price equation from evolutionary genetics, we provide the first analysis that contrasts the ecological and evolutionary consequences of ecological traps arising from two general types of perturbations known to trigger traps. Our model suggests that traps arising from degradation of existing habitats are more likely to facilitate extinction than those arising from the addition of novel trap habitat. Importantly, our framework reveals the mechanisms of these outcomes and the substantial scope for persistence via rapid evolution that may buffer many populations from extinction, helping to resolve the paradox of continued persistence of many species in dramatically altered landscapes.

摘要

理解在新环境中改变的生态和进化动态对于预测物种对快速环境变化的反应至关重要。与这种动态相关的一个基本概念是生态陷阱,它是由快速的人为变化引起的,并可能导致灭绝。当曾经适应的栖息地偏好变得不适应时,就会出现生态陷阱,因为个体在选择栖息地时偏好的线索会导致比其他选择更低的适应性。虽然已经强调陷阱可以由不同类型的人为变化引起,但这些不同类型的陷阱的后果仍然未知。我们使用一种新颖的模型框架,该框架建立在进化遗传学中的 Price 方程基础上,首次分析了两种已知会引发陷阱的一般类型的干扰所导致的生态和进化后果。我们的模型表明,由于现有栖息地退化而产生的陷阱比由于添加新的陷阱栖息地而产生的陷阱更有可能促进灭绝。重要的是,我们的框架揭示了这些结果的机制,以及通过快速进化而持续存在的巨大范围,这可能会缓冲许多种群免受灭绝,有助于解决许多物种在剧烈改变的景观中继续存在的悖论。

相似文献

1
4
Evaluating the metapopulation consequences of ecological traps.评估生态陷阱的集合种群后果。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Apr 7;282(1804):20142930. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2930.
5
Virus population extinction via ecological traps.通过生态陷阱实现病毒种群灭绝。
Ecol Lett. 2007 Mar;10(3):230-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.01013.x.
6
Ecological novelty and the emergence of evolutionary traps.生态新颖性与进化陷阱的出现。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Sep;28(9):552-60. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
8
Eco-evolutionary dynamics in a changing world.在不断变化的世界中的生态进化动态。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Feb;1249:1-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06419.x. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
9
Ecological traps: current evidence and future directions.生态陷阱:当前证据与未来方向
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 10;283(1824). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2647.

引用本文的文献

4
Transgenerational Plasticity in Human-Altered Environments.人类改变环境的跨代可塑性。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2020 Feb;35(2):115-124. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
5
Color polarization vision mediates the strength of an evolutionary trap.颜色偏振视觉介导了进化陷阱的强度。
Evol Appl. 2018 Sep 24;12(2):175-186. doi: 10.1111/eva.12690. eCollection 2019 Feb.
10
Ecological traps: current evidence and future directions.生态陷阱:当前证据与未来方向
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 10;283(1824). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2647.

本文引用的文献

3
Habitat selection and the perceptual trap.生境选择与感知陷阱。
Ecol Appl. 2010 Dec;20(8):2148-56. doi: 10.1890/09-2370.1.
4
The microevolutionary consequences of climate change.气候变化的微观进化后果。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1990 Sep;5(9):311-5. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(90)90088-U.
9
Quantitative trait evolution and environmental change.数量性状进化与环境变化。
PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004521. Epub 2009 Feb 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验