• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整体式氧化锂硅陶瓷制作的三单位固定修复体十年临床效果评价。

Ten-year outcome of three-unit fixed dental prostheses made from monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Propaedeutics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Christian-Albrechts University at Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

出版信息

J Am Dent Assoc. 2012 Mar;143(3):234-40. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0147.

DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0147
PMID:22383203
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The authors conducted a prospective study to evaluate the long-term outcome of crown-retained fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) made from monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS e.max Press, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein).

METHODS

Faculty dentists at the Department of Prosthodontics, Propaedeutics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Christian-Albrechts University at Kiel, Germany, placed 36 three-unit FDPs in 28 patients to replace six anterior and 30 posterior teeth. The proximal connector size (height and width) was 4 × 3 millimeters for anterior FDPs and 4 × 4 mm for posterior FDPs. FDPs were cemented either conventionally with glass ionomer cement (n = 19) or adhesively with resin-based composite (n = 17). Patients made annual recall visits.

RESULTS

The mean (standard deviation) observation period was 121 (12.8) months. FDPs' survival rate (survival being defined as remaining in place either with or without complications) was 100 percent after five years and 87.9 percent after 10 years, and their success rate (success being defined as remaining unchanged and free of complications) was 91.1 percent after five years and 69.8 percent after 10 years. The cementation method did not affect the outcome.

CONCLUSION

Three-unit FDPs made from monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic showed five- and 10-year survival and success rates that were similar to those of conventional metal-ceramic FDPs.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

If the manufacturer's recommendations are followed, three-unit FDPs made from monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic may be a safe alternative to metal-ceramic FDPs regardless of the cementation method used.

摘要

背景

作者进行了一项前瞻性研究,以评估由整块锂硅玻璃陶瓷(IPS e.max Press,Ivoclar Vivadent,列支敦士登沙安)制成的冠固位固定义齿(FDP)的长期效果。

方法

德国基尔大学牙科学院修复学、口腔外科学和牙科材料学系的教师牙医为 28 名患者放置了 36 个三单位 FDP,以替代六颗前牙和 30 颗后牙。前 FDP 的近中连接体尺寸(高度和宽度)为 4×3 毫米,后 FDP 为 4×4 毫米。FDP 分别用玻璃离子水门汀(n=19)或树脂基复合材料(n=17)常规粘结。患者每年进行一次复诊。

结果

平均(标准差)观察期为 121(12.8)个月。FDP 的五年生存率(定义为有或无并发症的保留率)为 100%,十年生存率为 87.9%,五年成功率(定义为无变化且无并发症)为 91.1%,十年成功率为 69.8%。粘结方法不影响结果。

结论

由整块锂硅玻璃陶瓷制成的三单位 FDP 的五年和十年生存率和成功率与传统金属陶瓷 FDP 相似。

临床意义

如果遵循制造商的建议,由整块锂硅玻璃陶瓷制成的三单位 FDP 可能是金属陶瓷 FDP 的安全替代物,无论使用何种粘结方法。

相似文献

1
Ten-year outcome of three-unit fixed dental prostheses made from monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic.整体式氧化锂硅陶瓷制作的三单位固定修复体十年临床效果评价。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2012 Mar;143(3):234-40. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0147.
2
Fifteen-year outcome of three-unit fixed dental prostheses made from monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic.整体式氧化硅锂陶瓷制作的三单位固定修复体的 15 年临床效果。
J Dent. 2019 Oct;89:103178. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
3
Clinical outcome of three-unit lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: up to 8 years results.三单位二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷固定义齿的临床结果:长达8年的随访结果
Dent Mater. 2009 Sep;25(9):e63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.05.003. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
4
Ten-year survival and complication rates of lithium-disilicate (Empress 2) tooth-supported crowns, implant-supported crowns, and fixed dental prostheses.二硅酸锂(Empress 2)牙支持式冠、种植体支持式冠及固定义齿的十年生存率和并发症发生率
J Dent. 2017 Jan;56:65-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.10.017. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
5
A preliminary prospective evaluation of all-ceramic crown-retained and inlay-retained fixed partial dentures.全瓷冠桥和嵌体固位固定局部义齿的初步前瞻性评估。
Int J Prosthodont. 2005 Nov-Dec;18(6):497-505.
6
Randomized clinical trial of implant-supported ceramic-ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: preliminary results.种植体支持的陶瓷-陶瓷和金属-陶瓷固定义齿的随机临床试验:初步结果。
J Prosthodont. 2014 Feb;23(2):73-82. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12066. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
7
Fifteen-year outcome of posterior all-ceramic inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses.后牙全瓷嵌体固位固定修复体的 15 年疗效。
J Dent. 2019 Oct;89:103174. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.07.012. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
8
A randomized controlled clinical trial of 3-unit posterior zirconia-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDP) with layered or pressed veneering ceramics: 3-year results.一项关于采用分层或压制饰面陶瓷的3单位后牙氧化锆陶瓷固定义齿(FDP)的随机对照临床试验:3年结果
J Dent. 2015 Nov;43(11):1365-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.013. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
9
Four-year clinical results of fixed dental prostheses with zirconia substructures (Cercon): end abutments vs. cantilever design.含氧化锆基底结构的固定义齿(Cercon)的四年临床结果:终端基牙与悬臂设计对比
Eur J Oral Sci. 2009 Dec;117(6):741-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00693.x.
10
Monolithic and bi-layer CAD/CAM lithium-disilicate versus metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: comparison of fracture loads and failure modes after fatigue.整体式和双层 CAD/CAM 二硅酸锂陶瓷与金属陶瓷固定义齿修复体:疲劳后断裂载荷和失效模式的比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Jun;17(5):1407-13. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0830-1. Epub 2012 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinician's Guide to Material Selection for All-Ceramics in Modern Digital Dentistry.现代数字化牙科全瓷材料选择的临床医生指南
Materials (Basel). 2025 May 12;18(10):2235. doi: 10.3390/ma18102235.
2
Considerations for Conservative, All-Ceramic Prosthodontic Single-Tooth Replacements in the Anterior Region: A Systematic Review.前牙区保守性全瓷修复单颗牙缺失的考量:一项系统评价
Dent J (Basel). 2025 May 19;13(5):219. doi: 10.3390/dj13050219.
3
The effects of restorative material and connector cross-section area on the stress distribution of fixed partial denture: a finite element analysis.
修复材料和连接体横截面积对固定局部义齿应力分布的影响:有限元分析
Head Face Med. 2025 Feb 28;21(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13005-025-00484-y.
4
Prospective evaluation of implants-supported, tooth-implant supported, and teeth-supported 3-unit posterior monolithic zirconia fixed restorations: Bite force and patient satisfaction.前瞻性评估种植体支持、牙种植体支持和牙支持的 3 单位后牙整体氧化锆固定修复体:咬合力和患者满意度。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023 Oct;9(5):810-819. doi: 10.1002/cre2.780. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
5
Clinical evaluation of cemented and adhesively resin-bonded monolithic and partially layered zirconia and lithium disilicate crowns.骨水泥固定和粘结树脂粘结的整体式及部分分层氧化锆和二硅酸锂全冠的临床评价
Saudi Dent J. 2023 Jul;35(5):508-514. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.04.001. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
6
An engineering perspective of ceramics applied in dental reconstructions.工程视角下的陶瓷在牙科修复中的应用。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2023 Feb 20;31:e20220421. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2022-0421. eCollection 2023.
7
Analysis of surface characteristics of (Y, Nb)-TZP after finishing and polishing.(Y, Nb)-四方相氧化锆多晶体在精整和抛光后的表面特性分析。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2022 Dec;14(6):335-345. doi: 10.4047/jap.2022.14.6.335. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
8
Survival of Complete Coverage Tooth-Retained Fixed Lithium Disilicate Prostheses: A Systematic Review.全瓷覆盖义齿保留天然牙固定修复体的存活率:一项系统评价。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 31;59(1):95. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010095.
9
A Critical Review of Dental Lithia-Based Glass-Ceramics.锂基牙科玻璃陶瓷的综述评价
J Dent Res. 2023 Mar;102(3):245-253. doi: 10.1177/00220345221142755. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
10
Fractographic and Microhardness Evaluation of All-Ceramic Hot-Pressed and CAD/CAM Restorations after Hydrothermal Aging.水热老化后全瓷热压和CAD/CAM修复体的断口分析及显微硬度评估
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jun 3;15(11):3987. doi: 10.3390/ma15113987.