• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

气枪噪声对海洋鱼类和鱿鱼行为的影响。

Impact of air gun noise on the behaviour of marine fish and squid.

机构信息

Environment and Agriculture, Curtin University, GPO Box U 1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia.

出版信息

Mar Pollut Bull. 2012 May;64(5):984-93. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.02.009
PMID:22385754
Abstract

In this study various species of captive marine fish and one species of squid were exposed to the noise from a single air gun. Six trials were conducted off the coast of Western Australia with each trial using a different noise exposure regime. Noise levels received by the animals ranged between 120 and 184 dB re 1 μPa(2).s (SEL). Behavioural observations of the fish and squid were made before, during and after air gun noise exposure. Results indicate that as air gun noise levels increase, fish respond by moving to the bottom of the water column and swimming faster in more tightly cohesive groups. Significant increases in alarm responses were observed in fish and squid to air gun noise exceeding 147-151 dB re 1 μPa SEL. An increase in the occurrence of alarm responses was also observed as noise level increased.

摘要

在这项研究中,各种海洋鱼类和一种鱿鱼被暴露在单个空气枪的噪声中。在西澳大利亚海岸进行了六次试验,每次试验使用不同的噪声暴露方案。动物接收到的噪声水平在 120 到 184 dB re 1 μPa(2).s(SEL)之间。在空气枪噪声暴露前后,对鱼类和鱿鱼进行了行为观察。结果表明,随着空气枪噪声水平的增加,鱼类通过游到水柱底部并以更紧密的群体游动来做出反应。在空气枪噪声超过 147-151 dB re 1 μPa SEL 时,观察到鱼类和鱿鱼对空气枪噪声的警报反应显著增加。随着噪声水平的增加,警报反应的发生率也有所增加。

相似文献

1
Impact of air gun noise on the behaviour of marine fish and squid.气枪噪声对海洋鱼类和鱿鱼行为的影响。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2012 May;64(5):984-93. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
2
Startle response of captive North Sea fish species to underwater tones between 0.1 and 64 kHz.圈养北海鱼类对0.1至64千赫兹水下音调的惊吓反应。
Mar Environ Res. 2008 Jun;65(5):369-77. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2008.01.001. Epub 2008 Jan 17.
3
Determining the behavioural dose-response relationship of marine mammals to air gun noise and source proximity.确定海洋哺乳动物对气枪噪声及声源距离的行为剂量反应关系。
J Exp Biol. 2017 Aug 15;220(Pt 16):2878-2886. doi: 10.1242/jeb.160192.
4
The inner ears of Northern Canadian freshwater fishes following exposure to seismic air gun sounds.加拿大北部淡水鱼暴露于地震气枪声音后的内耳。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Aug;124(2):1360-6. doi: 10.1121/1.2946702.
5
Physiological disturbance and recovery dynamics of bonefish (Albula vulpes), a tropical marine fish, in response to variable exercise and exposure to air.热带海水鱼北梭鱼(Albula vulpes)对不同运动及空气暴露的生理干扰和恢复动态
Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2007 Nov;148(3):664-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.08.018. Epub 2007 Aug 22.
6
Hydroacoustic measurements of the behavioral response of arctic riverine fishes to seismic airguns.北极河川鱼类对地震气枪行为反应的水声测量。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Sep;126(3):1598-606. doi: 10.1121/1.3177276.
7
Behaviour of fish by-catch in the mouth of a crustacean trawl.甲壳类拖网口中的兼捕鱼类行为。
J Fish Biol. 2012 Jun;80(7):2517-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03305.x. Epub 2012 May 4.
8
Effects of acoustic alarms, designed to reduce small cetacean bycatch in gillnet fisheries, on the behaviour of North Sea fish species in a large tank.旨在减少刺网渔业中小型鲸类副渔获物的声学警报对大型水箱中北海鱼类物种行为的影响。
Mar Environ Res. 2007 Aug;64(2):160-80. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2006.12.012. Epub 2007 Jan 9.
9
Behavior of captive herring exposed to naval sonar transmissions (1.0-1.6 kHz) throughout a yearly cycle.在一整年的周期中,被捕捞的鲱鱼暴露在海军声纳传输(1.0-1.6 kHz)下的行为。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Feb;131(2):1632-42. doi: 10.1121/1.3675944.
10
Are larvae of demersal fishes plankton or nekton?底栖鱼类的幼体是浮游生物还是自游生物?
Adv Mar Biol. 2006;51:57-141. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2881(06)51002-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Responses to sound in three Centrarchid species: Do heterospecific interactions change behavior?三种棘臀鱼科鱼类对声音的反应:异种间的相互作用会改变行为吗?
J Fish Biol. 2025 Feb;106(2):256-265. doi: 10.1111/jfb.15955. Epub 2024 Oct 6.
2
Fish responses to underwater sounds depend on auditory adaptations: An experimental test of the effect of motorboat sounds on the fish community of a large fluvial lake.鱼类对水下声音的反应取决于听觉适应性:摩托艇声音对大型河滨湖泊鱼类群落影响的实验测试。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Mar 11;14(3):e10946. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10946. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Toward a decade of ocean science for sustainable development through acoustic animal tracking.
通过声学动物跟踪实现海洋科学促进可持续发展的十年目标。
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Oct;28(19):5630-5653. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16343. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
4
Evolutionary responses of marine organisms to urbanized seascapes.海洋生物对城市化海景的进化响应。
Evol Appl. 2020 Jul 15;14(1):210-232. doi: 10.1111/eva.13048. eCollection 2021 Jan.
5
Underwater Acoustic Impulsive Noise Monitoring in Port Facilities: Case Study of the Port of Cartagena.港口设施水下冲击噪声监测:卡塔赫纳港案例研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Oct 28;19(21):4672. doi: 10.3390/s19214672.
6
A proteomic analysis of the statocyst endolymph in common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis): an assessment of acoustic trauma after exposure to sound.中文译文: 鱿鱼(Sepia officinalis)平衡囊内淋巴的蛋白质组学分析:暴露于声音后对声损伤的评估。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 27;9(1):9340. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45646-6.
7
A critical period of susceptibility to sound in the sensory cells of cephalopod hatchlings.头足类幼体感觉细胞对声音敏感的关键时期。
Biol Open. 2018 Oct 5;7(10):bio033860. doi: 10.1242/bio.033860.
8
Noise pollution limits metal bioaccumulation and growth rate in a filter feeder, the Pacific oyster Magallana gigas.噪声污染限制了滤食性贝类——太平洋牡蛎 Magallana gigas 体内的金属生物积累和生长速度。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 4;13(4):e0194174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194174. eCollection 2018.
9
Avoidance of seismic survey activities by penguins.企鹅避免地震调查活动。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 24;7(1):16305. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16569-x.
10
Anthropogenic noise pollution from pile-driving disrupts the structure and dynamics of fish shoals.打桩作业产生的人为噪音污染会扰乱鱼群的结构和动态。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Sep 27;284(1863). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1627.