• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

职业流行/摇滚音乐家的听力学和电生理学评估。

Audiological and electrophysiological assessment of professional pop/rock musicians.

作者信息

Samelli Alessandra G, Matas Carla G, Carvallo Renata M M, Gomes Raquel F, de Beija Carolina S, Magliaro Fernanda C L, Rabelo Camila M

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Noise Health. 2012 Jan-Feb;14(56):6-12. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.93314.

DOI:10.4103/1463-1741.93314
PMID:22387707
Abstract

In the present study, we evaluated peripheral and central auditory pathways in professional musicians (with and without hearing loss) compared to non-musicians. The goal was to verify if music exposure could affect auditory pathways as a whole. This is a prospective study that compared the results obtained between three groups (musicians with and without hearing loss and non-musicians). Thirty-two male individuals participated and they were assessed by: Immittance measurements, pure-tone air conduction thresholds at all frequencies from 0.25 to 20 kHz, Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions, Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR), and Cognitive Potential. The musicians showed worse hearing thresholds in both conventional and high frequency audiometry when compared to the non-musicians; the mean amplitude of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions was smaller in the musicians group, but the mean latencies of Auditory Brainstem Response and Cognitive Potential were diminished in the musicians when compared to the non-musicians. Our findings suggest that the population of musicians is at risk for developing music-induced hearing loss. However, the electrophysiological evaluation showed that latency waves of ABR and P300 were diminished in musicians, which may suggest that the auditory training to which these musicians are exposed acts as a facilitator of the acoustic signal transmission to the cortex.

摘要

在本研究中,我们评估了职业音乐家(有听力损失和无听力损失)与非音乐家相比的外周和中枢听觉通路。目的是验证音乐暴露是否会对整个听觉通路产生影响。这是一项前瞻性研究,比较了三组(有听力损失和无听力损失的音乐家以及非音乐家)之间获得的结果。32名男性个体参与了研究,他们接受了以下评估:声导抗测量、0.25至20kHz所有频率的纯音气导阈值、瞬态诱发耳声发射、听性脑干反应(ABR)和认知电位。与非音乐家相比,音乐家在传统和高频听力测定中表现出更差的听力阈值;音乐家组瞬态诱发耳声发射的平均幅度较小,但与非音乐家相比,音乐家的听性脑干反应和认知电位的平均潜伏期缩短。我们的研究结果表明,音乐家群体有患音乐性听力损失的风险。然而,电生理评估显示,音乐家的ABR和P300潜伏期波缩短,这可能表明这些音乐家接受的听觉训练促进了声信号向皮层的传递。

相似文献

1
Audiological and electrophysiological assessment of professional pop/rock musicians.职业流行/摇滚音乐家的听力学和电生理学评估。
Noise Health. 2012 Jan-Feb;14(56):6-12. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.93314.
2
Hearing in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians.非专业流行/摇滚音乐家的听力情况。
Ear Hear. 2006 Aug;27(4):321-30. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000224737.34907.5e.
3
Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.一组纯音听力阈值正常的职业歌手的瞬态诱发耳声发射。
Ear Hear. 2008 Jun;29(3):360-77. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31816a0d1e.
4
An assessment of threshold shifts in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians using conventional and extended high-frequency audiometry.使用传统和扩展高频听力测定法对非专业流行/摇滚音乐家的听阈变化进行评估。
Ear Hear. 2007 Sep;28(5):643-8. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31812f7144.
5
A longitudinal study investigating the effects of noise exposure on behavioural, electrophysiological and self-report measures of hearing in musicians with normal audiometric thresholds.一项纵向研究调查了噪声暴露对具有正常听阈的音乐家的行为、电生理和自我报告的听力测量的影响。
Hear Res. 2024 Sep 15;451:109077. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109077. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
6
[Application of auditory brainstem response (ABR) and 40 Hz auditory event related potential (40 Hz AERP) to the diagnosis of occupational noise-induced hearing impairment].听性脑干反应(ABR)和40赫兹听觉事件相关电位(40 Hz AERP)在职业性噪声性听力损伤诊断中的应用
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2012 Mar;30(3):196-8.
7
Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.对纯音、和声和言语的前注意皮层诱发反应:音乐训练的影响。
Ear Hear. 2009 Aug;30(4):432-46. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a61bf2.
8
Investigating the effects of noise exposure on self-report, behavioral and electrophysiological indices of hearing damage in musicians with normal audiometric thresholds.研究正常听阈音乐家的噪声暴露对自陈式、行为和电生理听力损伤指标的影响。
Hear Res. 2020 Sep 15;395:108021. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108021. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
9
Prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss in student musicians.学生音乐家噪声性听力损失的患病率。
Int J Audiol. 2010 Apr;49(4):309-16. doi: 10.3109/14992020903470809.
10
Hearing loss among classical-orchestra musicians.古典管弦乐队音乐家的听力损失
Noise Health. 2011 Jan-Feb;13(50):45-50. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.74001.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of the prevalence of musicians' hearing loss.一项关于音乐家听力损失患病率的范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 13;13:1472134. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1472134. eCollection 2025.
2
Pure-Tone Hearing Thresholds and Otoacoustic Emissions in Students of Music Academies.音乐学院学生的纯音听阈和耳声发射。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 1;18(3):1313. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031313.
3
Hearing Loss, Tinnitus, Hyperacusis, and Diplacusis in Professional Musicians: A Systematic Review.职业音乐家的听力损失、耳鸣、听觉过敏和双重听力:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 26;15(10):2120. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102120.
4
Enhanced auditory evoked potentials in musicians: A review of recent findings.音乐家增强的听觉诱发电位:近期研究结果综述。
J Otol. 2016 Jun;11(2):63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 7.
5
Musical Experience, Sensorineural Auditory Processing, and Reading Subskills in Adults.成人的音乐体验、感音神经性听觉处理与阅读子技能
Brain Sci. 2018 Apr 27;8(5):77. doi: 10.3390/brainsci8050077.
6
Hearing loss and tinnitus in rock musicians: A Norwegian survey.摇滚音乐家的听力损失与耳鸣:一项挪威的调查。
Noise Health. 2015 Nov-Dec;17(79):411-21. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.169708.
7
Auditory reserve and the legacy of auditory experience.听觉储备与听觉经验的传承。
Brain Sci. 2014 Nov 14;4(4):575-93. doi: 10.3390/brainsci4040575.