Suppr超能文献

命名还是描述:共享知识影响指称形式。

To name or to describe: shared knowledge affects referential form.

机构信息

Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3G3.

出版信息

Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Apr;4(2):290-305. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01182.x. Epub 2012 Mar 2.

Abstract

The notion of common ground is important for the production of referring expressions: In order for a referring expression to be felicitous, it has to be based on shared information. But determining what information is shared and what information is privileged may require gathering information from multiple sources, and constantly coordinating and updating them, which might be computationally too intensive to affect the earliest moments of production. Previous work has found that speakers produce overinformative referring expressions, which include privileged names, violating Grice's Maxims, and concluded that this is because they do not mark the distinction between shared and privileged information. We demonstrate that speakers are in fact quite effective in marking this distinction in the form of their utterances. Nonetheless, under certain circumstances, speakers choose to overspecify privileged names.

摘要

共同基础的概念对于指称表达的生成很重要

为了使指称表达恰当,它必须基于共享信息。但是确定哪些信息是共享的,哪些信息是有特权的,可能需要从多个来源收集信息,并不断协调和更新这些信息,这可能在计算上过于复杂,无法影响生产的最早时刻。先前的研究发现,说话者会生成过度信息丰富的指称表达,其中包括有特权的名称,这违反了格莱斯的准则,并得出结论认为,这是因为他们没有标记共享信息和特权信息之间的区别。我们证明,说话者实际上在他们的话语中非常有效地标记了这种区别。尽管如此,在某些情况下,说话者选择过度指定有特权的名称。

相似文献

1
To name or to describe: shared knowledge affects referential form.
Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Apr;4(2):290-305. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01182.x. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
2
What's learned together stays together: speakers' choice of referring expression reflects shared experience.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):843-53. doi: 10.1037/a0029467. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
3
What's in a Name? Interlocutors Dynamically Update Expectations about Shared Names.
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 26;7:212. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00212. eCollection 2016.
4
Conversation and convention: enduring influences on name choice for common objects.
Mem Cognit. 2004 Dec;32(8):1346-54. doi: 10.3758/bf03206325.
5
Rational Redundancy in Referring Expressions: Evidence from Event-related Potentials.
Cogn Sci. 2021 Dec;45(12):e13071. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13071.
6
Who Is He? Children with ASD and ADHD Take the Listener into Account in Their Production of Ambiguous Pronouns.
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0132408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132408. eCollection 2015.
7
Grice's cooperative principle in the psychoanalytic setting.
Psychoanal Rev. 2014 Dec;101(6):815-45. doi: 10.1521/prev.2014.101.6.815.
8
Producing pronouns and definite noun phrases: do speakers use the addressee's discourse model?
Cogn Sci. 2012 Sep-Oct;36(7):1289-311. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01255.x. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
9
When redundancy is useful: A Bayesian approach to "overinformative" referring expressions.
Psychol Rev. 2020 Jul;127(4):591-621. doi: 10.1037/rev0000186. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
10
Relating print and speech: the effects of letter names and word position on reading and spelling performance.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2002 Aug;82(4):305-40. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0965(02)00101-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding perspective-taking in multiparty conversations: insights from Mandarin nouns.
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 27;16:1499538. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1499538. eCollection 2025.
2
Direct and indirect linguistic measures of common ground in dialogue studies involving a matching task: A systematic review.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Feb;31(1):122-136. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02359-2. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
3
Beyond speaking: neurocognitive perspectives on language production in social interaction.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Apr 24;378(1875):20210483. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0483. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
4
Referential communication in people with recent-onset schizophrenia-spectrum disorders.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 9;13:971256. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.971256. eCollection 2022.
6
Quantitative mental state attributions in language understanding.
Sci Adv. 2021 Nov 19;7(47):eabj0970. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abj0970. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
7
Lifting the curse of knowing: How feedback improves perspective-taking.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Jun;74(6):1054-1069. doi: 10.1177/1747021820987080. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
9
Editorial: Models of Reference.
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 5;7:1855. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01855. eCollection 2016.
10
The director task: A test of Theory-of-Mind use or selective attention?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1121-1128. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1190-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Natural discourse reference generation reduces cognitive load in spoken systems.
Nat Lang Eng. 2011 Jul 1;17(3):311-329. doi: 10.1017/S1351324910000227.
2
The effect of information overlap on communication effectiveness.
Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;31(1):169-81. doi: 10.1080/03640210709336989.
3
Partner-specific interpretation of maintained referential precedents during interactive dialog.
J Mem Lang. 2009 Aug 1;61(2):171-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.003.
4
Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models.
J Mem Lang. 2008 Nov;59(4):434-446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007.
5
The role of executive function in perspective taking during online language comprehension.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Oct;16(5):893-900. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.893.
6
Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground.
Cognition. 2008 Oct;109(1):18-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.005. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
7
The role of perspective in identifying domains of reference.
Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):831-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.008. Epub 2008 Jun 30.
8
Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation.
Cognition. 2008 Jun;107(3):1122-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.005. Epub 2007 Dec 31.
9
The effect of culture on perspective taking.
Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul;18(7):600-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01946.x.
10
Heeding the voice of experience: the role of talker variation in lexical access.
Cognition. 2008 Feb;106(2):633-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.013. Epub 2007 May 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验