Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3G3.
Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Apr;4(2):290-305. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01182.x. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
The notion of common ground is important for the production of referring expressions: In order for a referring expression to be felicitous, it has to be based on shared information. But determining what information is shared and what information is privileged may require gathering information from multiple sources, and constantly coordinating and updating them, which might be computationally too intensive to affect the earliest moments of production. Previous work has found that speakers produce overinformative referring expressions, which include privileged names, violating Grice's Maxims, and concluded that this is because they do not mark the distinction between shared and privileged information. We demonstrate that speakers are in fact quite effective in marking this distinction in the form of their utterances. Nonetheless, under certain circumstances, speakers choose to overspecify privileged names.
为了使指称表达恰当,它必须基于共享信息。但是确定哪些信息是共享的,哪些信息是有特权的,可能需要从多个来源收集信息,并不断协调和更新这些信息,这可能在计算上过于复杂,无法影响生产的最早时刻。先前的研究发现,说话者会生成过度信息丰富的指称表达,其中包括有特权的名称,这违反了格莱斯的准则,并得出结论认为,这是因为他们没有标记共享信息和特权信息之间的区别。我们证明,说话者实际上在他们的话语中非常有效地标记了这种区别。尽管如此,在某些情况下,说话者选择过度指定有特权的名称。