Bauder Andrew R, Ferguson Toby A
Center for Neural Repair and Rehabilitation, Temple University, PA, USA.
J Vis Exp. 2012 Feb 22(60):3606. doi: 10.3791/3606.
Regeneration in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) is widely studied both for its relevance to human disease and to understand the robust regenerative response mounted by PNS neurons thereby possibly illuminating the failures of CNS regeneration(1). Sciatic nerve crush (axonotmesis) is one of the most common models of peripheral nerve injury in rodents(2). Crushing interrupts all axons but Schwann cell basal laminae are preserved so that regeneration is optimal(3,4). This allows the investigator to study precisely the ability of a growing axon to interact with both the Schwann cell and basal laminae(4). Rats have generally been the preferred animal models for experimental nerve crush. They are widely available and their lesioned sciatic nerve provides a reasonable approximation of human nerve lesions(5,4). Though smaller in size than rat nerve, the mouse nerve has many similar qualities. Most importantly though, mouse models are increasingly valuable because of the wide availability of transgenic lines now allows for a detailed dissection of the individual molecules critical for nerve regeneration(6, 7). Prior investigators have used multiple methods to produce a nerve crush or injury including simple angled forceps, chilled forceps, hemostatic forceps, vascular clamps, and investigator-designed clamps(8,9,10,11,12). Investigators have also used various methods of marking the injury site including suture, carbon particles and fluorescent beads(13,14,1). We describe our method to obtain a reproducibly complete sciatic nerve crush with accurate and persistent marking of the crush-site using a fine hemostatic forceps and subsequent carbon crush-site marking. As part of our description of the sciatic nerve crush procedure we have also included a relatively simple method of muscle whole mount we use to subsequently quantify regeneration.
外周神经系统(PNS)的再生因其与人类疾病的相关性以及对PNS神经元强大再生反应的理解而被广泛研究,这可能有助于阐明中枢神经系统(CNS)再生失败的原因(1)。坐骨神经挤压伤(轴突断裂)是啮齿动物外周神经损伤最常见的模型之一(2)。挤压会中断所有轴突,但施万细胞基膜得以保留,从而使再生达到最佳状态(3,4)。这使研究者能够精确研究生长中的轴突与施万细胞和基膜相互作用的能力(4)。大鼠通常是实验性神经挤压的首选动物模型。它们广泛可得,其受损的坐骨神经能合理模拟人类神经损伤(5,4)。虽然小鼠神经比大鼠神经小,但具有许多相似的特性。然而,最重要的是,由于现在有广泛可用的转基因品系,小鼠模型越来越有价值,这使得能够详细剖析对神经再生至关重要的单个分子(6,7)。先前的研究者使用了多种方法来造成神经挤压或损伤,包括简单的弯镊、冷镊、止血钳、血管夹和研究者设计的夹子(8,9,10,11,12)。研究者还使用了各种标记损伤部位的方法,包括缝线、碳颗粒和荧光珠(13,14,1)。我们描述了一种方法,使用精细止血钳获得可重复的完全坐骨神经挤压伤,并对挤压部位进行准确且持久的标记,随后进行碳标记挤压部位。作为我们对坐骨神经挤压程序描述的一部分,我们还包括了一种相对简单的肌肉整装方法,我们用它来随后量化再生情况。