Department of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 May;26(5):1274-80. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182510643.
This study investigated the effects of powerlifting gear on training volume and performance, defined by the squat, bench press, and deadlift. Eighteen powerlifters (18-26 years) were randomized into either a group that trained and competed using compressive gear (CG) or without the gear (NON). Training volume, volume progression, and powerlifting performance were assessed before and after 10 weeks of training. Training volume increased in the first 4 weeks for both groups. Volume lifted for squat and the totals were greater in the CG. There was an increase in squat (19.05 ± 30.97 lb, p = 0.02), deadlift (19.05 ± 21.17 lb, p = 0.001), and the total score (44.00 ± 60.44 lb, p = 0.005) for both the groups. The improvements in squat (CG = 33.85 vs. NON = 5.74, p = 0.07) and totals (CG = 66.59 vs. NON = 23.67, p = 0.15) were greater in the CG. Both groups showed a significant and similar increase in the Wilks scores (+13.54 points, p = 0.03). There was a trend toward greater volume progression in those wearing CG during the initial stages of training. Both the groups significantly improved performance for the squat, and deadlift, and had higher totals, and Wilks scores, indicating significant strength gains. The greater magnitude of improvements in the squat and totals for the CG lifters suggests an ergogenic potential of training with powerlifting gear.
本研究调查了举重装备对训练量和表现的影响,以深蹲、卧推和硬拉来定义。18 名举重运动员(18-26 岁)被随机分为使用压缩装备(CG)训练和比赛的组或不使用装备(NON)的组。在 10 周的训练前后,评估了训练量、训练量进展和举重表现。两组在前 4 周的训练量都增加了。CG 组的深蹲和总重量增加。深蹲(19.05±30.97 磅,p=0.02)、硬拉(19.05±21.17 磅,p=0.001)和总成绩(44.00±60.44 磅,p=0.005)均有增加。CG 组的深蹲(CG=33.85 与 NON=5.74,p=0.07)和总成绩(CG=66.59 与 NON=23.67,p=0.15)的改善更大。两组的威尔克斯得分(+13.54 分,p=0.03)都有显著且相似的增加。在训练的初始阶段,穿 CG 的人有更大的训练量进展趋势。两组的深蹲和硬拉表现都有显著提高,总成绩和威尔克斯得分也更高,表明力量有显著提高。CG 运动员在深蹲和总成绩方面的改善幅度更大,这表明举重装备训练具有潜在的促进作用。