Center for Bioethics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2012 Apr;102(4):586-91. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300483. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
Pandemic influenza planning in the United States violates the demands of social justice in 2 fundamental respects: it embraces the neutrality of procedural justice at the expense of more substantive concern with health disparities, thus perpetuating a predictable and preventable social injustice, and it fails to move beyond lament to practical planning for alleviating barriers to accessing care. A pragmatic social justice approach, addressing both health disparities and access barriers, should inform pandemic preparedness. Achieving social justice goals in pandemic response is challenging, but strategies are available to overcome the obstacles. The public engagement process of one state's pandemic ethics project influenced the development of these strategies.
它以程序性正义的中立为代价,更实质性地关注卫生差异,从而使可预见和可预防的社会不正义永久化,并且未能超越对缓解获得护理障碍的实际规划的悲叹。一种务实的社会正义方法,既要解决卫生差异问题,又要解决获取障碍问题,应该为大流行性流感的防备提供信息。在大流行性流感应对中实现社会正义目标具有挑战性,但是有策略可以克服这些障碍。一个州的大流行性流感伦理项目的公众参与过程影响了这些策略的制定。