Garon Josette
Am J Psychoanal. 2012 Mar;72(1):33-45. doi: 10.1057/ajp.2011.45.
In his (1909) paper, Introjection and Transference, Ferenczi puts forward the murder that, at the end, has to be inevitably repeated with the patient. This idea is particularly pertinent to patients who are victims of transgenerational traumas and their disavowal. The capacity to talk and even to think is paralyzed when a family history is made of emptiness, murder and madness. The case of an interminable analysis allows us to grasp how trauma and its disavowal are reenacted in the transference and in the countertransference. The patient comes to analysis searching for meaning in the face of something that could not be elaborated and remains meaningless. Interpretation and construction open the way to a process of historicization/subjectivation that is essential to access temporalization and to open up a future that might escape the repetition of a disavowed and timeless past.
在他1909年的论文《内摄与移情》中，费伦齐提出，最终必然会与患者重复发生的“谋杀”。这个观点对于那些遭受代际创伤及其否认的患者尤为相关。当家族史充斥着空虚、谋杀和疯狂时，谈话甚至思考的能力都会被麻痹。一个无休止分析的案例让我们能够理解创伤及其否认是如何在移情和反移情中重演的。患者前来分析是为了在面对无法阐述且毫无意义的事情时寻找意义。解释和建构开启了一个历史化/主体化的过程，这对于进入时间化以及开辟一个可能摆脱被否认的、无时间性的过去之重复的未来至关重要。
