• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

引入 GRADE 贯穿 NICE 临床指南计划。

Introducing GRADE across the NICE clinical guideline program.

机构信息

Centre for Clinical Practice, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, City Tower, Piccadilly Plaza, Manchester M1 4BD, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;66(2):124-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.12.007. Epub 2012 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.12.007
PMID:22406196
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) is a system for rating the confidence in estimates of effect and grading guideline recommendations. It promotes evaluation of the quality of the evidence for each outcome and an assessment of balance between desirable and undesirable outcomes leading to a judgment about the strength of the recommendation. In 2007, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence began introducing GRADE across its clinical guideline program to enable separation of judgments about the evidence quality from judgments about the strength of the recommendation.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We describe the process of implementing GRADE across guidelines.

RESULTS

Use of GRADE has been positively received by both technical staff and guideline development group members.

CONCLUSION

A shift in thinking about confidence in the evidence was required leading to a more structured and transparent approach to decision making. Practical problems were also encountered; these have largely been resolved, but some areas require further work, including the application of imprecision and presenting results from analyses considering more than two alternative interventions. The use of GRADE for nonrandomized and diagnostic accuracy studies needs to be refined.

摘要

目的

推荐评估、制定与评估分级(GRADE)是一种用于评估效果估计置信度和分级指南推荐的系统。它促进了对每个结局证据质量的评估,并对理想和不理想结局之间的平衡进行了评估,从而对推荐强度做出判断。2007 年,英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所开始在其临床指南项目中引入 GRADE,以实现对证据质量判断和推荐强度判断的分离。

研究设计和设置

我们描述了在指南中实施 GRADE 的过程。

结果

GRADE 的使用得到了技术人员和指南制定小组成员的积极响应。

结论

需要改变对证据可信度的思维方式,从而采用更具结构性和透明性的决策方法。实际中也遇到了一些问题;这些问题在很大程度上已经得到解决,但仍有一些领域需要进一步研究,包括不精确性的应用以及呈现考虑两种以上替代干预措施的分析结果。需要进一步完善 GRADE 在非随机和诊断准确性研究中的应用。

相似文献

1
Introducing GRADE across the NICE clinical guideline program.引入 GRADE 贯穿 NICE 临床指南计划。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;66(2):124-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.12.007. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
2
[GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (confidence in the estimates of effect)].[GRADE指南:3. 对证据质量进行评级(对效应估计值的信心)]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(6):449-56. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.013. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
3
Synthesis, grading, and presentation of evidence in guidelines: article 7 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.指南中证据的综合、分级和呈现:COPD 指南制定中整合和协调工作的第 7 条。美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会工作组报告。
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):256-61. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-060ST.
4
GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.GRADE 指南:《临床流行病学杂志》的一系列新文章。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):380-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.011. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
5
[Guidelines are made more transparent with the GRADE method: considerations for recommendations are explicit in the new method].采用GRADE方法使指南更加透明:新方法中对推荐意见的考量是明确的。
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2012;156(25):A4379.
6
[GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables].[GRADE指南:1. 引言 - GRADE证据概要及结果总结表]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(5):357-68. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
7
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines part 3 of 3. The GRADE approach to developing recommendations.临床实践指南质量评估和推荐强度分级(第 3 部分,共 3 部分)。推荐意见制定的 GRADE 方法。
Allergy. 2011 May;66(5):588-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02530.x. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
8
GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes.GRADE 指南:2. 提出问题并确定重要结局。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
9
Grading recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: randomised experimental evaluation of four different systems.临床实践指南中的推荐分级:四种不同系统的随机对照试验评估。
Arch Dis Child. 2011 Aug;96(8):723-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.199307. Epub 2011 May 19.
10
How to use a clinical practice guideline.如何使用临床实践指南。
J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):472-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.041. Epub 2008 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of retinal vein occlusion.视网膜静脉阻塞的诊断和管理临床实践指南的系统评价。
Eye (Lond). 2024 Jun;38(9):1722-1733. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03008-1. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
2
Automating Quality Assessment of Medical Evidence in Systematic Reviews: Model Development and Validation Study.系统评价中医疗证据质量评估的自动化:模型开发和验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 13;25:e35568. doi: 10.2196/35568.
3
Digital Anthropometry: A Systematic Review on Precision, Reliability and Accuracy of Most Popular Existing Technologies.
数字人体测量学:最流行现有技术的精度、可靠性和准确性的系统评价。
Nutrients. 2023 Jan 7;15(2):302. doi: 10.3390/nu15020302.
4
Evaluation of the quality of COVID-19 guidance documents in anaesthesia using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.使用评估研究和评估工具 II 评估麻醉 COVID-19 指导文件的质量。
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Dec;129(6):851-860. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.09.008. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
5
Quality of recent clinical practice guidelines in anaesthesia publications using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.近期麻醉学出版物中临床实践指南的质量评估:应用研究和评估指南 II 工具。
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Apr;128(4):655-663. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.11.037. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
6
Can you trust clinical practice guidelines for laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜手术的临床实践指南可靠吗?腹腔镜手术临床实践指南的系统评价。
Updates Surg. 2022 Apr;74(2):391-401. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01168-3. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
7
Challenges in applying the GRADE approach in public health guidelines and systematic reviews: a concept article from the GRADE Public Health Group.在公共卫生指南和系统评价中应用 GRADE 方法的挑战:来自 GRADE 公共卫生组的概念文章。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;135:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
8
Consensus guidelines for management of hyperammonaemia in paediatric patients receiving continuous kidney replacement therapy.儿童连续性肾脏替代治疗患者高血氨管理的共识指南。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020 Aug;16(8):471-482. doi: 10.1038/s41581-020-0267-8. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
9
Smoking cessation programmes for women living in disadvantaged communities, "We Can Quit 2": A systematic review protocol.针对生活在弱势社区的女性的戒烟项目,“我们能戒烟2”:一项系统评价方案。
HRB Open Res. 2019 Jun 12;2:10. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.12901.1. eCollection 2019.
10
Pediatric intradialytic hypotension: recommendations from the Pediatric Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (PCRRT) Workgroup.儿科透析中低血压:儿科连续性肾脏替代治疗(PCRRT)工作组的建议。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2019 May;34(5):925-941. doi: 10.1007/s00467-018-4190-1. Epub 2019 Feb 8.