Nayak Gurudutt, Singh Inderpreet, Shetty Shashit, Dahiya Surya
Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Kanti Devi Dental College & Hospital, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Assistant Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Dasmesh Institute of Research & Dental Sciences, Faridkot, Punjab, India.
J Dent (Tehran). 2014 May;11(3):302-9. Epub 2014 May 31.
Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants during cleaning and shaping of the root canal is one of the main causes of periapical inflammation and postoperative flare-ups. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively measure the amount of debris and irrigants extruded apically in single rooted canals using two reciprocating and one rotary single file nickel-titanium instrumentation systems.
Sixty human mandibular premolars, randomly assigned to three groups (n = 20) were instrumented using two reciprocating (Reciproc and Wave One) and one rotary (One Shape) single-file nickel-titanium systems. Bidistilled water was used as irrigant with traditional needle irrigation delivery system. Eppendorf tubes were used as test apparatus for collection of debris and irrigant. The volume of extruded irrigant was collected and quantified via 0.1-mL increment measure supplied on the disposable plastic insulin syringe. The liquid inside the tubes was dried and the mean weight of debris was assessed using an electronic microbalance. The data were statistically analysed using Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test and Mann Whitney U test with Bonferroni adjustment. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant.
The Reciproc file system produced significantly more debris compared with OneShape file system (P<0.05), but no statistically significant difference was obtained between the two reciprocating instruments (P>0.05). Extrusion of irrigant was statistically insignificant irrespective of the instrument or instrumentation technique used (P >0.05).
Although all systems caused apical extrusion of debris and irrigant, continuous rotary instrumentation was associated with less extrusion as compared with the use of reciprocating file systems.
根管清理和预备过程中碎屑和冲洗液的根尖挤出是根尖周炎和术后疼痛发作的主要原因之一。本研究的目的是使用两种往复式和一种旋转式单根镍钛器械系统,定量测量单根管中根尖挤出的碎屑和冲洗液的量。
60颗人下颌前磨牙随机分为三组(n = 20),分别使用两种往复式(Reciproc和Wave One)和一种旋转式(One Shape)单根镍钛系统进行预备。使用传统的针式冲洗系统,以双蒸水作为冲洗液。使用Eppendorf管作为收集碎屑和冲洗液的测试装置。通过一次性塑料胰岛素注射器上提供的0.1 mL增量测量来收集和量化挤出冲洗液的体积。将管内液体干燥,使用电子微量天平评估碎屑的平均重量。使用Kruskal-Wallis非参数检验和经Bonferroni校正的Mann Whitney U检验对数据进行统计学分析。P值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
与OneShape锉系统相比,Reciproc锉系统产生的碎屑明显更多(P<0.05),但两种往复式器械之间未获得统计学上的显著差异(P>0.05)。无论使用何种器械或预备技术,冲洗液的挤出在统计学上均无显著意义(P>0.05)。
尽管所有系统都会导致碎屑和冲洗液的根尖挤出,但与使用往复锉系统相比,连续旋转预备产生的挤出较少。