Suppr超能文献

采用 3 种方法从枳椇(Citrus aurantium L. var. amara Engl.)芽中提取挥发油的 GC/MS 比较分析。

Comparative GC/MS analysis of essential oils extracted by 3 methods from the bud of Citrus aurantium L. var. amara Engl.

机构信息

College of Food and Bioengineering, South China Univ. of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, China.

出版信息

J Food Sci. 2011 Nov-Dec;76(9):C1219-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02421.x.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

A comparative study of steam distillation extraction (SDE), reflux extraction (RE), and ultrasound-assisted extraction (USE) was conducted for the extraction of essential oils from the bud of Citrus aurantium L. var. amara Engl. Each method was evaluated in terms of qualitative and quantitative composition of the isolated essential oil by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). The extract yields of essential oil were 0.16%, 2.18%, and 2.34%, respectively. A total of 82 compounds were identified by GC/MS. The main components obtained by SDE were terpinen-4-ol (20.98%), dipentene (11.67%), terpinene (9.24%), those by RE were palmitic acid (20.61%), 2-chloroethyl linoleate (14.54%), tetracosane (12.26%), and α-linolenic acid (11.24%), and those by USE were tetracosane (11.32%), heneicosane (11.06%), and palmitic acid (8.76%). Comparative analysis indicated that SDE was favorable for the extraction of monoterpene hydrocarbons, sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, alcohols, and carbonyl compounds, RE and USE had certain advantages in the extraction of aliphatic saturated hydrocarbons, organic acids, and esters. It is concluded that different extraction methods may lead to different yields of essential oils; the choice of appropriate method is very important to obtain more desired components with higher physiological activities.

PRACTICAL APPLICATION

C. aurantium oils from different plant parts have great economic, medicinal, and nutritional values because of their wide-spectrum biological activities. The essential oil from C. aurantium L. var amara is one of the best C. aurantium oils. The data presented in this article will help us understand the relationship between essential oils and its extraction methods and know more about the aromatic components of Citrus aurantium bud. The methods established in this study will provide useful reference information for further studies, and offer essential oil industries with helpful guidance in practice.

摘要

未加标签

对水蒸气蒸馏提取(SDE)、回流提取(RE)和超声辅助提取(USE)进行了比较研究,以从苦橙(Citrus aurantium L. var. amara Engl.)芽中提取精油。通过气相色谱/质谱(GC/MS)对每种方法进行了定性和定量组成的评估。精油的提取率分别为 0.16%、2.18%和 2.34%。通过 GC/MS 共鉴定出 82 种化合物。SDE 得到的主要成分是萜品-4-醇(20.98%)、二戊烯(11.67%)、萜品(9.24%),RE 得到的主要成分是棕榈酸(20.61%)、2-氯乙基亚油酸酯(14.54%)、二十四烷(12.26%)和α-亚麻酸(11.24%),USE 得到的主要成分是二十四烷(11.32%)、正二十烷(11.06%)和棕榈酸(8.76%)。比较分析表明,SDE 有利于单萜烃、倍半萜烃、醇和羰基化合物的提取,RE 和 USE 有利于饱和脂肪烃、有机酸和酯的提取。结论是不同的提取方法可能导致精油产量不同;选择合适的方法对于获得具有更高生理活性的更多所需成分非常重要。

实际应用

不同植物部位的苦橙精油因其广泛的生物活性而具有巨大的经济、药用和营养价值。苦橙 L. var amara 的精油是最好的苦橙精油之一。本文介绍的相关数据有助于我们了解精油与其提取方法之间的关系,以及更多地了解苦橙芽的芳香成分。本研究建立的方法将为进一步的研究提供有用的参考信息,并为精油行业提供实践中的有益指导。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验