• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of the effectiveness of compression stockings and layer compression systems in venous ulceration treatment.比较压迫弹力袜和分层压迫系统在静脉溃疡治疗中的效果。
Arch Med Sci. 2010 Oct;6(5):793-9. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2010.17097. Epub 2010 Oct 26.
2
Compression for venous leg ulcers.腿部静脉溃疡的压迫治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD000265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000265.pub3.
3
Compression for venous leg ulcers.下肢静脉性溃疡的压迫治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD000265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000265.pub2.
4
VenUS IV (Venous leg Ulcer Study IV) - compression hosiery compared with compression bandaging in the treatment of venous leg ulcers: a randomised controlled trial, mixed-treatment comparison and decision-analytic model.VenUS IV(下肢静脉溃疡研究IV)——弹力袜与弹力绷带治疗下肢静脉溃疡的比较:一项随机对照试验、混合治疗比较及决策分析模型
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Sep;18(57):1-293, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta18570.
5
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of compression hosiery versus compression bandages in treatment of venous leg ulcers (Venous leg Ulcer Study IV, VenUS IV): a randomised controlled trial.压力袜与绷带治疗静脉性腿部溃疡的临床和成本效益比较(静脉性腿部溃疡研究 IV,VenUS IV):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2014 Mar 8;383(9920):871-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62368-5. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
6
Graduated compression stockings for the initial treatment of varicose veins in people without venous ulceration.梯度压力弹力袜治疗无静脉溃疡的静脉曲张初始治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 16;7(7):CD008819. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008819.pub4.
7
A randomised controlled trial of compression therapies for the treatment of venous leg ulcers (VenUS 6): study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel-group, three-arm randomised controlled trial.一项针对静脉性腿部溃疡(VenUS 6)治疗的压缩疗法的随机对照试验:一项实用、多中心、平行组、三臂随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 May 26;24(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07349-2.
8
Protocol for a pilot randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of a graduated three layer straight tubular bandaging system when compared to a standard short stretch compression bandaging system in the management of people with venous ulceration: 3VSS2008.一项比较渐层式三层直筒型弹性绷带系统与标准短型弹性压迫绷带系统在治疗静脉溃疡患者之效果的初步随机对照临床试验议定书:3VSS2008。
Trials. 2010 Mar 9;11:26. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-26.
9
Immediate hemodynamic effect of the additional use of the SCD EXPRESS Compression System in patients with venous ulcers treated with the four-layer compression bandaging system.在接受四层加压绷带系统治疗的静脉溃疡患者中额外使用SCD EXPRESS加压系统的即刻血流动力学效应。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Apr;33(4):483-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.11.033. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
10
A Meta-analysis to Compare Four-layer to Short-stretch Compression Bandaging for Venous Leg Ulcer Healing.一项比较四层与短拉伸加压绷带用于腿部静脉溃疡愈合的荟萃分析。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2018 May;64(5):30-37.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Unna's boot on venous ulcer healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Unna 靴对静脉性溃疡愈合的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2024 Sep 2;58:e20230397. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0397en. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparative Efficacy of Postoperative Compression Methods After EVLT for Great Saphenous Vein Insufficiency.腔内激光治疗大隐静脉功能不全术后不同压迫方法的疗效比较
J Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Feb 28;15:e2. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2024.02. eCollection 2024.
3
A randomised controlled trial of compression therapies for the treatment of venous leg ulcers (VenUS 6): study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel-group, three-arm randomised controlled trial.一项针对静脉性腿部溃疡(VenUS 6)治疗的压缩疗法的随机对照试验:一项实用、多中心、平行组、三臂随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 May 26;24(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07349-2.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of the treatment with compressive therapy in the healing of venous ulcers.压迫疗法治疗静脉溃疡的成本效益分析。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2023 Mar 27;31:e3839. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.6017-3839.
5
A meta-review of the impact of compression therapy on venous leg ulcer healing.一项关于压迫疗法对静脉性腿部溃疡愈合影响的荟萃回顾。
Int Wound J. 2023 Feb;20(2):430-447. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13891. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
6
Compression bandages or stockings versus no compression for treating venous leg ulcers.压迫绷带或弹力袜与非压迫治疗静脉性腿部溃疡的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 26;7(7):CD013397. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013397.pub2.
7
Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Points for the Management of Venous Ulcers.静脉溃疡管理的循证临床实践要点
Indian J Surg. 2018 Apr;80(2):171-182. doi: 10.1007/s12262-018-1726-3. Epub 2018 Jan 27.
8
Compression for Primary Prevention, Treatment, and Prevention of Recurrence of Venous Leg Ulcers: An Evidence-and Consensus-Based Algorithm for Care Across the Continuum.原发性预防、治疗及预防下肢静脉溃疡复发的压迫疗法:基于证据和共识的连续性护理算法
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2016 Jul-Aug;43(4):347-64. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000242.
9
Venous leg ulcers.下肢静脉性溃疡
BMJ Clin Evid. 2016 Jan 15;2016:1902.
10
Network meta-analysis of (individual patient) time to event data alongside (aggregate) count data.(个体患者)事件发生时间数据与(汇总)计数数据的网状Meta分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Sep 10;14:105. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-105.

本文引用的文献

1
Indications for compression therapy in venous and lymphatic disease consensus based on experimental data and scientific evidence. Under the auspices of the IUP.基于实验数据和科学证据的静脉和淋巴疾病压迫治疗指征共识。由国际血管外科学会(IUP)主持。
Int Angiol. 2008 Jun;27(3):193-219.
2
Calf compression pressure required to achieve venous closure from supine to standing positions.从仰卧位到站立位实现静脉闭合所需的小腿加压压力。
J Vasc Surg. 2005 Oct;42(4):734-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.06.030.
3
Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: consensus statement.慢性静脉疾病CEAP分类的修订:共识声明。
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Dec;40(6):1248-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.09.027.
4
Comparison of surgery and compression with compression alone in chronic venous ulceration (ESCHAR study): randomised controlled trial.慢性静脉溃疡手术与单纯压迫治疗的比较(ESCHAR研究):随机对照试验
Lancet. 2004 Jun 5;363(9424):1854-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16353-8.
5
Randomized trial of cohesive short-stretch versus four-layer bandaging in the management of venous ulceration.
Wound Repair Regen. 2004 Mar-Apr;12(2):157-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1067-1927.2004.012206.x.
6
A randomised controlled study of four-layer compression versus Unna's Boot for venous ulcers.四层加压与尤纳靴治疗静脉性溃疡的随机对照研究。
J Wound Care. 2004 Jan;13(1):21-4. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2004.13.1.26563.
7
Multi-layer compression: comparison of four different four-layer bandage systems applied to the leg.多层加压:应用于腿部的四种不同四层绷带系统的比较。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004 Jan;27(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.10.014.
8
Randomized trial of four-layer and two-layer bandage systems in the management of chronic venous ulceration.四层与两层绷带系统治疗慢性静脉溃疡的随机试验
Wound Repair Regen. 2003 May-Jun;11(3):166-71. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2003.11303.x.
9
Some effects of sustained compression on ulcerated tissues.
Angiology. 2002 Jul-Aug;53(4):451-6. doi: 10.1177/000331970205300412.
10
Multicentre, randomised controlled trial of four-layer bandaging versus short-stretch bandaging in the treatment of venous leg ulcers.多层绷带与短拉伸绷带治疗下肢静脉性溃疡的多中心随机对照试验
Vasa. 2001 May;30(2):108-13. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526.30.2.108.

比较压迫弹力袜和分层压迫系统在静脉溃疡治疗中的效果。

Comparison of the effectiveness of compression stockings and layer compression systems in venous ulceration treatment.

机构信息

Department of Surgery Nursing, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland.

出版信息

Arch Med Sci. 2010 Oct;6(5):793-9. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2010.17097. Epub 2010 Oct 26.

DOI:10.5114/aoms.2010.17097
PMID:22419941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3298351/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the research was to compare the dynamics of venous ulcer healing when treated with the use of compression stockings as well as original two- and four-layer bandage systems.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A group of 46 patients suffering from venous ulcers was studied. This group consisted of 36 (78.3%) women and 10 (21.70%) men aged between 41 and 88 years (the average age was 66.6 years and the median was 67). Patients were randomized into three groups, for treatment with the ProGuide two-layer system, Profore four-layer compression, and with the use of compression stockings class II. In the case of multi-layer compression, compression ensuring 40 mmHg blood pressure at ankle level was used.

RESULTS

In all patients, independently of the type of compression therapy, a few significant statistical changes of ulceration area in time were observed (Student's t test for matched pairs, p < 0.05). The largest loss of ulceration area in each of the successive measurements was observed in patients treated with the four-layer system - on average 0.63 cm2/per week. The smallest loss of ulceration area was observed in patients using compression stockings - on average 0.44 cm(2)/per week. However, the observed differences were not statistically significant (Kruskal-Wallis test H = 4.45, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A systematic compression therapy, applied with preliminary blood pressure of 40 mmHg, is an effective method of conservative treatment of venous ulcers. Compression stockings and prepared systems of multi-layer compression were characterized by similar clinical effectiveness.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在比较使用压缩袜和原始的双层和四层绷带系统治疗静脉溃疡愈合的动态。

材料与方法

研究了一组 46 名患有静脉溃疡的患者。该组包括 36 名(78.3%)女性和 10 名(21.70%)男性,年龄在 41 至 88 岁之间(平均年龄为 66.6 岁,中位数为 67 岁)。患者随机分为三组,分别接受 ProGuide 双层系统、Profore 四层压缩治疗和使用 II 级压缩袜治疗。在多层压缩的情况下,使用确保踝部血压为 40mmHg 的压缩。

结果

在所有患者中,无论压缩治疗类型如何,都观察到溃疡面积随时间的几个显著统计学变化(配对学生 t 检验,p<0.05)。在每个连续测量中,溃疡面积损失最大的是接受四层系统治疗的患者-平均每周 0.63cm2。溃疡面积损失最小的是使用压缩袜的患者-平均每周 0.44cm2。然而,观察到的差异没有统计学意义(Kruskal-Wallis 检验 H=4.45,p>0.05)。

结论

系统的压缩治疗,应用 40mmHg 的初步血压,是保守治疗静脉溃疡的有效方法。压缩袜和准备好的多层压缩系统具有相似的临床效果。