Flinders University of South Australia, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide 5041, Australia.
Sleep Med. 2012 Apr;13(4):378-84. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2011.11.005. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
To explore the discrepancy between sleep diary and actigraphic measures of sleep in adolescents and to ascertain whether these discrepancies may vary according to characteristics of the participant.
Participants were 385 adolescents aged 13-18years (X=15.6, standard deviation [SD]=0.95; 60% male) from eight high schools in South Australia. Adolescents completed the School Sleep Habits Survey and Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale during class time, followed by an 8-day sleep diary and wrist actigraphy. The Flinders Fatigue Scale was completed on the final day of the study. Parents completed a sleep, medical, education, and family history survey.
Actigraphic estimates of wake after sleep onset (WASO) were substantially greater than sleep diary estimates (74min actigraphy vs. 7min sleep diary) and actigraphic estimates of total sleep time were substantially less than sleep diary and parent report (6h 51min actigraphy vs. 8h 16min sleep diary vs. 8h 51 parent report). Actigraphy displayed no significant relationship with daytime functioning and weak relationships with concomitantly recorded sleep diary variables. Sex and puberty-related differences in actigraphic scoring were found, with more WASO and less sleep scored in boys compared to girls and more WASO scored amongst pubertally-mature boys than boys of less advanced pubertal development.
There may be differences in the sleep of adolescents that result in less actigraphic total sleep scored than perceived, particularly in boys, possibly because of increased sleep motor activity in adolescents that actigraphic algorithms score as wake. This is a significant concern that requires further examination with polysomnography.
探讨青少年睡眠日记与活动记录仪测量睡眠之间的差异,并确定这些差异是否可能因参与者的特征而有所不同。
参与者为来自南澳大利亚州 8 所高中的 385 名 13-18 岁青少年(X=15.6,标准差[SD]=0.95;60%为男性)。青少年在课堂上完成了学校睡眠习惯调查和小儿日间嗜睡量表,随后进行了 8 天的睡眠日记和腕部活动记录仪记录。在研究的最后一天完成了弗林德斯疲劳量表。家长完成了睡眠、医疗、教育和家庭史调查。
活动记录仪估计的睡眠后觉醒时间(WASO)明显高于睡眠日记估计值(74 分钟活动记录仪 vs. 7 分钟睡眠日记),而活动记录仪估计的总睡眠时间明显低于睡眠日记和家长报告(6h51min 活动记录仪 vs. 8h16min 睡眠日记 vs. 8h51 家长报告)。活动记录仪与日间功能无显著相关性,与同时记录的睡眠日记变量仅有微弱相关性。在活动记录仪评分方面发现了性别和青春期相关的差异,男孩的 WASO 更多,睡眠更少,青春期成熟的男孩比青春期发育较慢的男孩的 WASO 更多。
青少年的睡眠可能存在差异,导致活动记录仪记录的总睡眠时间少于感知到的睡眠时间,尤其是男孩,这可能是因为青少年的睡眠运动活动增加,而活动记录仪算法将其记为清醒。这是一个需要进一步通过多导睡眠图检查的重要问题。