• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

边缘型人格障碍患者与非患者相比,积极注意偏向降低:一项自由观看眼动追踪研究的结果

Reduced positive attentional bias in patients with borderline personality disorder compared with non-patients: results from a free-viewing eye-tracking study.

作者信息

Wenk Taavi, Günther Anna-Christina, Webelhorst Carolin, Kersting Anette, Bodenschatz Charlott Maria, Suslow Thomas

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Semmelweisstr. 10, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2024 Sep 16;11(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40479-024-00267-y.

DOI:10.1186/s40479-024-00267-y
PMID:39278912
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11403868/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Attentional processes are important for regulating emotional states and coping with stressful events. Orientation of attention acts as filter for subsequent information processing. So far, only few eye-tracking studies have examined attentional processes during emotion perception in borderline personality disorder (BPD). In these studies, gaze behaviour was analysed during simultaneous or delayed evaluation of single stimuli. The objective of the present eye-tracking study was to investigate early and late attention allocation towards emotional facial expressions in patients with BPD and non-patients (NPs) based on a free-viewing paradigm, which allows to examine processes of self-generated attention deployment.

METHODS

In a multiple-stimulus free-viewing task with facial expressions, i.e. happy, angry, sad, and neutral faces, presented simultaneously early and late attentional allocation was analysed in 43 patients with BPD and 43 age- and sex-matched NPs. We assessed study participants' trait anxiety, depressive symptoms, level of alexithymia, traumatic childhood experiences, and borderline symptoms. Entry time was used to measure initial gaze orientation, whereas dwell time was calculated as an index of late attention allocation.

RESULTS

As could be expected, patients with BPD reported more anxiety, depressive symptoms, experiences of childhood maltreatment, and showed higher levels of alexithymia than NPs. Patients differed from NPs in dwell time on happy facial expressions but not in dwell time on angry, sad, and neutral expressions. Contrary to our hypothesis, patients did not differ from NPs concerning entry times on angry facial expressions.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our results, patients with BPD show a reduced attentional preference for happy facial expression during free viewing compared to NPs. A decreased positive attentional bias at a late processing stage could be part of emotion regulation impairments and add to the vulnerability for negative affects in BPD, which represent core symptoms of the disorder. In contrast to previous eye-tracking research in BPD examining attention during evaluative processing, our dwell time data could be more indicative of self-generated, endogenously controlled attentional processes in emotion perception. The present data do not support an early vigilance for threatening social information in BPD.

摘要

背景

注意力过程对于调节情绪状态和应对压力事件很重要。注意力定向作为后续信息处理的过滤器。到目前为止,只有少数眼动追踪研究考察了边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者在情绪感知过程中的注意力过程。在这些研究中,在对单个刺激进行同时或延迟评估期间分析了注视行为。本眼动追踪研究的目的是基于自由观看范式,调查BPD患者和非患者(NP)对情绪化面部表情的早期和晚期注意力分配情况,该范式允许检查自我产生的注意力部署过程。

方法

在一个具有面部表情(即开心、愤怒、悲伤和中性面孔)的多刺激自由观看任务中,同时在早期和晚期分析了43名BPD患者和43名年龄及性别匹配的NP的注意力分配情况。我们评估了研究参与者的特质焦虑、抑郁症状、述情障碍水平、童年创伤经历和边缘型症状。进入时间用于测量初始注视定向,而注视时间被计算为晚期注意力分配的指标。

结果

正如预期的那样,BPD患者报告的焦虑、抑郁症状、童年虐待经历更多,并且述情障碍水平高于NP。患者与NP在开心面部表情上的注视时间存在差异,但在愤怒、悲伤和中性表情上的注视时间没有差异。与我们的假设相反,患者在愤怒面部表情的进入时间上与NP没有差异。

结论

根据我们的结果,与NP相比,BPD患者在自由观看期间对开心面部表情的注意力偏好降低。在后期处理阶段积极注意力偏差的减少可能是情绪调节障碍的一部分,并增加了BPD中负面影响的易感性,这是该障碍的核心症状。与之前在BPD中检查评估过程中注意力的眼动追踪研究不同,我们的注视时间数据可能更能表明情绪感知中自我产生的、内源性控制的注意力过程。目前的数据不支持BPD患者对威胁性社会信息的早期警觉。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0237/11403868/985bbeb9bb5b/40479_2024_267_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0237/11403868/8f67f7a0f5fd/40479_2024_267_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0237/11403868/c5c206edd3cc/40479_2024_267_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0237/11403868/985bbeb9bb5b/40479_2024_267_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0237/11403868/8f67f7a0f5fd/40479_2024_267_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0237/11403868/c5c206edd3cc/40479_2024_267_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0237/11403868/985bbeb9bb5b/40479_2024_267_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Reduced positive attentional bias in patients with borderline personality disorder compared with non-patients: results from a free-viewing eye-tracking study.边缘型人格障碍患者与非患者相比,积极注意偏向降低:一项自由观看眼动追踪研究的结果
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2024 Sep 16;11(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40479-024-00267-y.
2
Biased Attention to Facial Expressions of Ambiguous Emotions in Borderline Personality Disorder: An Eye-Tracking Study.边缘型人格障碍患者对面部表情歧义性的偏向注意:一项眼动研究。
J Pers Disord. 2019 Oct;33(5):671-S8. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2019_33_363. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
3
Attentional bias and childhood maltreatment in clinical depression - An eye-tracking study.注意力偏向与临床抑郁症中的儿童期虐待:一项眼动追踪研究。
J Psychiatr Res. 2019 May;112:83-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.02.025. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
4
Automatic processing of facial affects in patients with borderline personality disorder: associations with symptomatology and comorbid disorders.边缘型人格障碍患者面部表情的自动加工:与症状学及共病的关联
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2015 Jul 14;14:20. doi: 10.1186/s12991-015-0058-y. eCollection 2015.
5
Deployment of attention to facial expressions varies as a function of emotional quality-but not in alexithymic individuals.对面部表情的注意力分配会因情绪特质而有所不同,但在述情障碍个体中并非如此。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 6;15:1338194. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1338194. eCollection 2024.
6
Attentional processes during emotional face perception in social anxiety disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of eye-tracking findings.社交焦虑障碍患者情绪面孔感知过程中的注意:眼动研究的系统综述和荟萃分析。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 20;111:110353. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110353. Epub 2021 May 15.
7
An eye-tracking study of interpersonal threat sensitivity and adverse childhood experiences in borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍患者人际威胁敏感性与童年不良经历的眼动追踪研究
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2021 Jan 4;8(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40479-020-00141-7.
8
Positive attentional bias mediates the relationship between trait emotional intelligence and trait affect.积极的注意偏向在特质情绪智力和特质情绪之间起中介作用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 1;12(1):20733. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25317-9.
9
Experiences of maltreatment in childhood and attention to facial emotions in healthy young women.童年期虐待经历与健康年轻女性对面部情绪的关注。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 12;12(1):4317. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08290-1.
10
Patients with borderline personality disorder and comorbid PTSD show biased attention for threat in the facial dot-probe task.患有边缘型人格障碍和共病创伤后应激障碍的患者在面部点探测任务中表现出对威胁的偏见性注意。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;67:101437. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural Violence and the Effects of the Patriarchal Structure on the Diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder (BDP): A Critical Study Using Tools on BPD Symptoms and Social Violence.结构性暴力与父权结构对边缘型人格障碍(BDP)诊断的影响:一项运用边缘型人格障碍症状及社会暴力相关工具的批判性研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 29;22(2):196. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020196.

本文引用的文献

1
Individuals vary in their overt attention preference for positive images consistently across time and stimulus types.个体在不同时间和刺激类型下对正性图像的显性注意偏好存在差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 15;14(1):8712. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58987-8.
2
Exploring the 'mood congruency' hypothesis of attention allocation - An eye-tracking study.探索注意力分配的“情绪一致性”假说——一项眼动研究。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Feb 15;347:619-629. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.12.004. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
3
The free-viewing matrix task: A reliable measure of attention allocation in psychopathology.
自由观看矩阵任务:精神病理学中注意力分配的可靠测量方法。
J Anxiety Disord. 2023 Dec;100:102789. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102789. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
4
Free-viewing gaze patterns reveal a mood-congruency bias in MDD during an affective fMRI/eye-tracking task.自由观看的注视模式揭示了在情感 fMRI/眼动追踪任务中 MDD 患者的情绪一致性偏见。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Apr;274(3):559-571. doi: 10.1007/s00406-023-01608-8. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
5
Positive attentional bias mediates the relationship between trait emotional intelligence and trait affect.积极的注意偏向在特质情绪智力和特质情绪之间起中介作用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 1;12(1):20733. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25317-9.
6
A review of attentional bias modification trainings for depression.抑郁的注意偏向修正训练的综述。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2023 Mar;29(3):789-803. doi: 10.1111/cns.14022. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
7
Experiences of maltreatment in childhood and attention to facial emotions in healthy young women.童年期虐待经历与健康年轻女性对面部情绪的关注。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 12;12(1):4317. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08290-1.
8
Eye tracking evidence of threat-related attentional bias in anxiety- and fear-related disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.焦虑和恐惧相关障碍中威胁相关注意偏向的眼动追踪证据:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2022 Apr;93:102142. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102142. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
9
Attentional processes during emotional face perception in social anxiety disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of eye-tracking findings.社交焦虑障碍患者情绪面孔感知过程中的注意:眼动研究的系统综述和荟萃分析。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 20;111:110353. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110353. Epub 2021 May 15.
10
An eye-tracking study of interpersonal threat sensitivity and adverse childhood experiences in borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍患者人际威胁敏感性与童年不良经历的眼动追踪研究
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2021 Jan 4;8(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40479-020-00141-7.