Suppr超能文献

塞来昔布联合激素治疗与单纯激素治疗用于激素敏感型前列腺癌:来自 STAMPEDE 多臂、多阶段、随机对照试验的初步结果。

Celecoxib plus hormone therapy versus hormone therapy alone for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: first results from the STAMPEDE multiarm, multistage, randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2012 May;13(5):549-58. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70088-8. Epub 2012 Mar 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Long-term hormone therapy alone is standard care for metastatic or high-risk, non-metastatic prostate cancer. STAMPEDE--an international, open-label, randomised controlled trial--uses a novel multiarm, multistage design to assess whether the early additional use of one or two drugs (docetaxel, zoledronic acid, celecoxib, zoledronic acid and docetaxel, or zoledronic acid and celecoxib) improves survival in men starting first-line, long-term hormone therapy. Here, we report the preplanned, second intermediate analysis comparing hormone therapy plus celecoxib (arm D) with hormone therapy alone (control arm A).

METHODS

Eligible patients were men with newly diagnosed or rapidly relapsing prostate cancer who were starting long-term hormone therapy for the first time. Hormone therapy was given as standard care in all trial arms, with local radiotherapy encouraged for newly diagnosed patients without distant metastasis. Randomisation was done using minimisation with a random element across seven stratification factors. Patients randomly allocated to arm D received celecoxib 400 mg twice daily, given orally, until 1 year or disease progression (including prostate-specific antigen [PSA] failure). The intermediate outcome was failure-free survival (FFS) in three activity stages; the primary outcome was overall survival in a subsequent efficacy stage. Research arms were compared pairwise against the control arm on an intention-to-treat basis. Accrual of further patients was discontinued in any research arm showing safety concerns or insufficient evidence of activity (lack of benefit) compared with the control arm. The minimum targeted activity at the second intermediate activity stage was a hazard ratio (HR) of 0·92. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00268476, and with Current Controlled Trials, number ISRCTN78818544.

FINDINGS

2043 patients were enrolled in the trial from Oct 17, 2005, to Jan 31, 2011, of whom 584 were randomly allocated to receive hormone therapy alone (control group; arm A) and 291 to receive hormone therapy plus celecoxib (arm D). At the preplanned analysis of the second intermediate activity stage, with 305 FFS events (209 in arm A, 96 in arm D), there was no evidence of an advantage for hormone therapy plus celecoxib over hormone therapy alone: HR 0·94 (95% CI 0·74-1·20). [corrected]. 2-year FFS was 51% (95% CI 46-56) in arm A and 51% (95% CI 43-58) in arm D. There was no evidence of differences in the incidence of adverse events between groups (events of grade 3 or higher were noted at any time in 123 [23%, 95% CI 20-27] patients in arm A and 64 [25%, 19-30] in arm D). The most common grade 3-5 events adverse effects in both groups were endocrine disorders (55 [11%] of patients in arm A vs 19 [7%] in arm D) and musculoskeletal disorders (30 [6%] of patients in arm A vs 15 [6%] in arm D). The independent data monitoring committee recommended stopping accrual to both celecoxib-containing arms on grounds of lack of benefit and discontinuing celecoxib for patients currently on treatment, which was endorsed by the trial steering committee.

INTERPRETATION

Celecoxib 400 mg twice daily for up to 1 year is insufficiently active in patients starting hormone therapy for high-risk prostate cancer, and we do not recommend its use in this setting. Accrual continues seamlessly to the other research arms and follow-up of all arms will continue to assess effects on overall survival.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK, Pfizer, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Medical Research Council (London, UK).

摘要

背景

长期单独使用激素治疗是转移性或高危、非转移性前列腺癌的标准治疗方法。STAMPEDE 是一项国际性、开放性、随机对照试验,采用了一种新的多臂、多阶段设计,评估在开始一线长期激素治疗时早期额外使用一种或两种药物(多西他赛、唑来膦酸、塞来昔布、唑来膦酸和多西他赛、或唑来膦酸和塞来昔布)是否能改善生存。在此,我们报告了预先计划的第二次中间分析,比较了激素治疗加塞来昔布(D 组)与单独激素治疗(对照组 A)。

方法

符合条件的患者为新诊断或快速复发的前列腺癌患者,他们首次开始长期激素治疗。所有试验组均给予标准的激素治疗,对于没有远处转移的新发患者,鼓励局部放疗。随机化采用最小化方法,通过七个分层因素中的随机元素进行。随机分配到 D 组的患者每天口服两次塞来昔布 400mg,直到 1 年或疾病进展(包括 PSA 失败)。中间结果是三个活动阶段的无失败生存(FFS);主要结果是随后的疗效阶段的总生存。基于意向治疗,研究组与对照组进行两两比较。任何研究组出现安全问题或与对照组相比缺乏活动证据(无益处)时,研究组的入组即停止。第二个中间活动阶段的最小目标活动是风险比(HR)为 0.92。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT00268476,并在 Current Controlled Trials 注册,编号为 ISRCTN78818544。

结果

2005 年 10 月 17 日至 2011 年 1 月 31 日,共有 2043 名患者入组该试验,其中 584 名患者随机分配接受单独激素治疗(对照组;A 组),291 名患者接受激素治疗加塞来昔布(D 组)。在第二次中间活动阶段的预定分析中,FFS 事件达到 305 例(A 组 209 例,D 组 96 例),没有证据表明激素治疗加塞来昔布比单独激素治疗有优势:HR 0.94(95%CI 0.74-1.20)。[更正]。A 组 2 年 FFS 为 51%(95%CI 46-56),D 组为 51%(95%CI 43-58)。两组不良事件发生率无差异(任何时间点,A 组有 123 例[23%,95%CI 20-27]患者和 D 组有 64 例[25%,19-30]患者出现 3 级或更高的不良事件)。两组最常见的 3-5 级不良事件是内分泌紊乱(A 组 55 例[11%],D 组 19 例[7%])和肌肉骨骼疾病(A 组 30 例[6%],D 组 15 例[6%])。独立数据监测委员会建议停止所有包含塞来昔布的研究组入组,理由是缺乏益处,并停止正在接受治疗的患者使用塞来昔布,试验指导委员会也同意了这一建议。

解释

高危前列腺癌患者开始激素治疗时,塞来昔布 400mg 每日两次治疗 1 年是不够有效的,我们不建议在此情况下使用。继续无缝入组其他研究组,所有组的随访将继续评估对总生存的影响。

资金来源

英国癌症研究中心、辉瑞公司、诺华公司、赛诺菲-安万特公司、英国医学研究理事会(伦敦)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22a7/3398767/5a984f50446a/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验