Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, HuaShan Hospital, No.12, Wulumuqi Middle Road, Shanghai 200040, China.
J Endocrinol Invest. 2013 Jan;36(1):33-7. doi: 10.3275/8304. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
To evaluate the efficiency of fasting capillary blood glucose (FCG) measurement as compared with fasting venous plasma glucose (FPG) measurement in screening diabetes and pre-diabetes in low-resource rural settings.
In 2010, 993 participants were randomly selected from 9 villages in Yunnan province using cluster sampling method. Samples for FCG and FPG test were obtained after demographics and physical examination. The oral glucose tolerance test was performed in parallel as gold standard for diagnosis. Diagnostic capacities of the FCG measurement in predicting undiagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes were assessed. The performance of FCG and FPG tests was compared.
Fifty-seven individuals with undiagnosed diabetes and 145 subjects with pre-diabetes were detected. The concordance between FCG and FPG levels was high (r = 0.75, p < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) for FCG test in predicting diabetes was 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-0.93] with the optimal cutoff value of 5.65 mmol/l, sensitivity of 84.2%, and specificity of 79.3%. The corresponding values in FPG tests were 0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.97) (AUC), 6.51 mmol/l (optimal cutoff point), 82.5% (sensitivity) and 98.3% (specificity), respectively. No significant difference was found in the AUC for the two screening strategies.
FCG measurement is considered to be a convenient, practicable screening method in low-resource rural communities with acceptable test properties.
评估在资源匮乏的农村地区,空腹毛细血管血糖(FCG)测量与空腹静脉血浆血糖(FPG)测量相比,在糖尿病和糖尿病前期筛查中的效率。
2010 年,采用整群抽样法从云南省 9 个村庄中随机选择了 993 名参与者。在进行人口统计学和体格检查后,采集 FCG 和 FPG 检测样本。并行进行口服葡萄糖耐量试验作为诊断的金标准。评估了 FCG 测量在预测未确诊糖尿病和糖尿病前期方面的诊断能力。比较了 FCG 和 FPG 检测的性能。
共检出 57 例未确诊的糖尿病患者和 145 例糖尿病前期患者。FCG 与 FPG 水平之间具有高度一致性(r=0.75,p<0.001)。FCG 检测在预测糖尿病方面的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.88(95%置信区间[CI]0.82-0.93),最佳截断值为 5.65mmol/L,灵敏度为 84.2%,特异性为 79.3%。FPG 检测的相应值分别为 0.92(95%CI0.88-0.97)(AUC)、6.51mmol/L(最佳截断点)、82.5%(灵敏度)和 98.3%(特异性)。两种筛查策略的 AUC 无显著差异。
在资源匮乏的农村社区中,FCG 测量被认为是一种方便、可行的筛查方法,具有可接受的检测性能。