Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e34083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034083. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
Unambiguous identification of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) is not possible by conventional microbiology. Molecular characterisation of phenotypically defined NTHi isolates suggests that up to 40% are Haemophilus haemolyticus (Hh); however, the genetic similarity of NTHi and Hh limits the power of simple molecular techniques such as PCR for species discrimination.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here we assess the ability of previously published and novel PCR-based assays to identify true NTHi. Sixty phenotypic NTHi isolates, classified by a dual 16S rRNA gene PCR algorithm as NTHi (n = 22), Hh (n = 27) or equivocal (n = 11), were further characterised by sequencing of the 16S rRNA and recA genes then interrogated by PCR-based assays targeting the omp P2, omp P6, lgtC, hpd, 16S rRNA, fucK and iga genes. The sequencing data and PCR results were used to define NTHi for this study. Two hpd real time PCR assays (hpd#1 and hpd#3) and the conventional iga PCR assay were equally efficient at differentiating study-defined NTHi from Hh, each with a receiver operator characteristic curve area of 0.90 [0.83; 0.98]. The hpd#1 and hpd#3 assays were completely specific against a panel of common respiratory bacteria, unlike the iga PCR, and the hpd#3 assay was able to detect below 10 copies per reaction.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our data suggest an evolutionary continuum between NTHi and Hh and therefore no single gene target could completely differentiate NTHi from Hh. The hpd#3 real time PCR assay proved to be the superior method for discrimination of NTHi from closely related Haemophilus species with the added potential for quantification of H. influenzae directly from specimens. We suggest the hpd#3 assay would be suitable for routine NTHi surveillance and to assess the impact of antibiotics and vaccines, on H. influenzae carriage rates, carriage density, and disease.
传统微生物学无法明确鉴定非分型流感嗜血杆菌(NTHi)。表型定义的 NTHi 分离株的分子特征表明,多达 40%是溶血流感嗜血杆菌(Hh);然而,NTHi 和 Hh 的遗传相似性限制了简单分子技术(如 PCR)进行物种鉴别。
方法/主要发现:在这里,我们评估了先前发表和新的基于 PCR 的检测方法识别真正的 NTHi 的能力。通过双 16S rRNA 基因 PCR 算法将 60 个表型 NTHi 分离株分类为 NTHi(n=22)、Hh(n=27)或不确定(n=11),然后通过 16S rRNA 和 recA 基因测序进一步鉴定,然后通过针对 omp P2、omp P6、lgtC、hpd、16S rRNA、fucK 和 iga 基因的基于 PCR 的检测方法进行检测。测序数据和 PCR 结果用于为本研究定义 NTHi。两种 hpd 实时 PCR 检测法(hpd#1 和 hpd#3)和传统的 iga PCR 检测法在区分研究定义的 NTHi 和 Hh 方面同样有效,每个检测法的接收者操作特征曲线面积为 0.90 [0.83;0.98]。与 iga PCR 不同,hpd#1 和 hpd#3 检测法针对常见呼吸道细菌的特异性完全不同,而 hpd#3 检测法能够检测到每个反应低于 10 个拷贝。
结论/意义:我们的数据表明,NTHi 和 Hh 之间存在进化连续体,因此没有单一的基因靶标可以完全区分 NTHi 和 Hh。hpd#3 实时 PCR 检测法被证明是区分 NTHi 与密切相关的流感嗜血杆菌的较好方法,并且具有直接从标本中定量检测流感嗜血杆菌的潜力。我们建议 hpd#3 检测法适用于 NTHi 的常规监测以及评估抗生素和疫苗对流感嗜血杆菌携带率、携带密度和疾病的影响。