Wallerstein Lilian França, Tricoli Valmor, Barroso Renato, Rodacki A L F, Russo Luciano, Aihara André Yui, da Rocha Correa Fernandes Artur, de Mello Marco Tulio, Ugrinowitsch Carlos
School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Aging Phys Act. 2012 Apr;20(2):171-85. doi: 10.1123/japa.20.2.171.
The purpose of this study was to compare the neuromuscular adaptations produced by strength-training (ST) and power-training (PT) regimens in older individuals. Participants were balanced by quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA) and leg-press 1-repetition maximum and randomly assigned to an ST group (n = 14; 63.6 ± 4.0 yr, 79.7 ± 17.2 kg, and 163.9 ± 9.8 cm), a PT group (n = 16; 64.9 ± 3.9 yr, 63.9 ± 11.9 kg, and 157.4 ± 7.7 cm), or a control group (n = 13; 63.0 ± 4.0 yr, 67.2 ± 10.8 kg, and 159.8 ± 6.8 cm). ST and PT were equally effective in increasing (a) maximum dynamic and isometric strength (p < .05), (b) increasing quadriceps muscle CSA (p < .05), and (c) decreasing electrical mechanical delay of the vastus lateralis muscle (p < .05). There were no significant changes in neuromuscular activation after training. The novel finding of the current study is that PT seems to be an attractive alternative to regular ST to maintain and improve muscle mass.
本研究的目的是比较力量训练(ST)和功率训练(PT)方案对老年人产生的神经肌肉适应性。参与者根据股四头肌横截面积(CSA)和腿举1次最大重量进行均衡分组,并随机分配到ST组(n = 14;63.6±4.0岁,79.7±17.2 kg,身高163.9±9.8 cm)、PT组(n = 16;64.9±3.9岁,63.9±11.9 kg,身高157.4±7.7 cm)或对照组(n = 13;63.0±4.0岁,67.2±10.8 kg,身高159.8±6.8 cm)。ST和PT在增加(a)最大动态和等长力量方面(p <.05)、(b)增加股四头肌CSA方面(p <.05)以及(c)减少股外侧肌的电机械延迟方面(p <.05)效果相同。训练后神经肌肉激活没有显著变化。本研究的新发现是,PT似乎是维持和改善肌肉质量的常规ST的一种有吸引力的替代方案。