• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

iPod 视频干预对器官捐献同意率的影响:一项随机试验。

Effect of an iPod video intervention on consent to donate organs: a randomized trial.

机构信息

Center for Reducing Health Disparities, MetroHealth Campus of Case Western Reserve University, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Minority Organ Tissue Transplant Education Program, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2012 Apr 3;156(7):483-90. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-7-201204030-00004.

DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-156-7-201204030-00004
PMID:22473435
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3597077/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The gap between the supply of organs available for transplantation and demand is growing, especially among ethnic groups.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of a video designed to address concerns of ethnic groups about organ donation.

DESIGN

Cluster randomized, controlled trial. Randomization was performed by using a random-number table with centralized allocation concealment. Participants and investigators assessing outcomes were not blinded to group assignment. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00870506)

SETTING

Twelve branches of the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles in northeastern Ohio.

PARTICIPANTS

952 participants aged 15 to 66 years.

INTERVENTION

Video (intervention; n = 443) or usual Bureau of Motor Vehicles license practices (control; n = 509).

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who provided consent for organ donation on a newly acquired driver's license, learner's permit, or state identification card. Secondary outcomes included willingness to make a living kidney donation to a family member in need and personal beliefs about donation.

RESULTS

More participants who viewed the video consented to donate organs than control participants (84% vs. 72%; difference, 12 percentage points [95% CI, 6 to 17 percentage points]). The video was effective among black participants (76% vs. 54%; difference, 22 percentage points [CI, 9 to 35 percentage points]) and white participants (88% vs. 77%; difference, 11 percentage points [CI, 5 to 15 percentage points]). At the end of the trial, fewer intervention than control participants reported having insufficient information about organ donation (34% vs. 44%; difference, -10 percentage points [CI, -16 to -4 percentage points]), wanting to be buried with all of their organs (14% vs. 25%; difference, -11 percentage points [CI, -16 to -6 percentage points]), and having conflicts with organ donation (7% vs. 11%; difference, -4 percentage points [CI, -8 to -2 percentage points]).

LIMITATION

How the observed increases in consent to donate organs might translate into a greater organ supply in the region is unclear.

CONCLUSION

Exposure to a brief video addressing concerns that ethnic groups have about organ donation just before obtaining a license, permit, or identification card increased consent to donate organs among white and black participants.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Institutes of Health and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

摘要

背景

器官移植的供应与需求之间的差距越来越大,尤其是在少数民族群体中。

目的

评估一段旨在解决少数民族群体对器官捐献的担忧的视频的效果。

设计

整群随机对照试验。使用随机数字表和集中式隐藏进行随机分组。参与者和评估结果的调查人员对分组分配不知情。(临床试验.gov 注册号:NCT00870506)

地点

俄亥俄州东北部的俄亥俄州机动车局的 12 个分支机构。

参与者

952 名年龄在 15 至 66 岁之间的参与者。

干预措施

视频(干预组;n = 443)或机动车局的常规驾照发放实践(对照组;n = 509)。

测量

主要结果是在新获得的驾驶执照、学习许可证或州身份证上,同意器官捐献的参与者比例。次要结果包括愿意向有需要的家庭成员捐赠活体肾脏以及个人对捐赠的看法。

结果

观看视频的参与者比对照组更愿意捐献器官(84%对 72%;差异,12 个百分点[95%置信区间,6 至 17 个百分点])。该视频对黑人参与者(76%对 54%;差异,22 个百分点[95%置信区间,9 至 35 个百分点])和白人参与者(88%对 77%;差异,11 个百分点[95%置信区间,5 至 15 个百分点])均有效。在试验结束时,与对照组相比,干预组报告对器官捐献的信息了解不足的参与者更少(34%对 44%;差异,-10 个百分点[95%置信区间,-16 至-4 个百分点]),希望死后完整保留自己器官的参与者更少(14%对 25%;差异,-11 个百分点[95%置信区间,-16 至-6 个百分点]),以及存在器官捐献冲突的参与者更少(7%对 11%;差异,-4 个百分点[95%置信区间,-8 至-2 个百分点])。

局限性

该地区通过观察增加的同意捐赠器官的数量如何转化为更大的器官供应尚不清楚。

结论

在获得驾照、许可证或身份证之前,观看一段简短的视频来解决少数民族群体对器官捐献的担忧,可以增加白人和黑人参与者捐献器官的意愿。

主要资金来源

美国国立卫生研究院和罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d614/3597077/274decadc55a/nihms444061f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d614/3597077/274decadc55a/nihms444061f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d614/3597077/274decadc55a/nihms444061f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of an iPod video intervention on consent to donate organs: a randomized trial.iPod 视频干预对器官捐献同意率的影响:一项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Apr 3;156(7):483-90. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-7-201204030-00004.
2
Effects of a Video on Organ Donation Consent Among Primary Care Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.视频对基层医疗患者器官捐赠同意率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Aug;31(8):832-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3630-5.
3
Organ donation video messaging in motor vehicle offices: results of a randomized trial.机动车管理办公室的器官捐赠视频宣传:一项随机试验的结果
Prog Transplant. 2015 Dec;25(4):332-8. doi: 10.7182/pit2015166.
4
Factors influencing families' consent for donation of solid organs for transplantation.影响家庭同意捐赠实体器官用于移植的因素。
JAMA. 2001 Jul 4;286(1):71-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.1.71.
5
Comparing web-based video interventions to enhance university student willingness to donate organs: A randomized controlled trial.比较基于网络的视频干预措施以增强大学生捐献器官的意愿:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Transplant. 2019 Apr;33(4):e13506. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13506. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
6
Comparison of black and white families' experiences and perceptions regarding organ donation requests.黑人和白人家庭在器官捐赠请求方面的经历与看法比较。
Crit Care Med. 2003 Jan;31(1):146-51. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200301000-00023.
7
8
Ethnic and gender differences in willingness among high school students to donate organs.高中生器官捐赠意愿中的种族和性别差异。
J Adolesc Health. 2006 Aug;39(2):266-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.12.028.
9
Assessing racial and ethnic differences in medical student knowledge, attitudes and behaviors regarding organ donation.评估医学生在器官捐献方面的知识、态度和行为的种族及民族差异。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2007 Feb;99(2):131-7.
10
Differences in willingness to donate cadaveric organ between young donor families and adult donor families: evidence from the Hunan Province, China.年轻供体家庭和成年供体家庭在捐献尸体器官意愿方面的差异:来自中国湖南省的证据。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(15):2830-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Randomized intervention to assess the effectiveness of an educational video on organ donation intent among Hispanics in the New York metropolitan area.随机干预以评估教育视频对纽约大都市区西班牙裔人群器官捐赠意愿的有效性。
World J Transplant. 2023 Jun 18;13(4):190-200. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v13.i4.190.
2
Interventions for increasing solid organ donor registration.增加实体器官捐献者登记的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 4;4(4):CD10829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010829.pub2.
3
A Randomized Intervention to Assess the Effectiveness of an Educational Video on Organ Donation Intent.一项评估器官捐赠意愿教育视频有效性的随机干预研究。
Kidney360. 2021 Jul 28;2(10):1625-1632. doi: 10.34067/KID.0001392021. eCollection 2021 Oct 28.
4
Targeting versus Tailoring Educational Videos for Encouraging Deceased Organ Donor Registration in Black-Owned Barbershops.针对在黑人拥有的理发店中鼓励已故器官捐献登记的教育视频的目标定位与定制。
J Health Commun. 2022 Jan 2;27(1):37-48. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2022.2035021. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
5
Evaluating the Performance of Driver's License Agencies Using a Standardized Donor Ratio.使用标准化捐赠者比例评估驾照机构的绩效。
Transplant Proc. 2021 Mar;53(2):555-559. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.07.018. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
6
Assessment of High School Students' Participation in Blood Donation and Registration as an Organ Donor.评估高中生参与献血和器官捐献登记的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2016377. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16377.
7
Increasing Organ Donor Designation Rates in Adolescents: A Cluster Randomized Trial.提高青少年器官捐献指定率:一项整群随机试验。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Sep;109(9):1273-1279. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305178. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
8
Comparing web-based video interventions to enhance university student willingness to donate organs: A randomized controlled trial.比较基于网络的视频干预措施以增强大学生捐献器官的意愿:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Transplant. 2019 Apr;33(4):e13506. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13506. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
9
A quantitative appraisal of African Americans' decisions to become registered organ donors at the driver's license office.对非裔美国人在驾照办公室注册成为器官捐献者的决定进行定量评估。
Clin Transplant. 2018 Oct;32(10):e13402. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13402. Epub 2018 Sep 23.
10
Awareness and attitudes toward corneal donation: challenges and opportunities.对角膜捐献的认知与态度:挑战与机遇
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun 7;12:1049-1059. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S142702. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Increasing organ donor registration rates by providing an immediate and complete registration opportunity: an experimental assessment of the IIFF model.通过提供即时且完整的注册机会来提高器官捐赠者登记率:IIFF 模型的实验评估。
Psychol Health Med. 2011 Dec;16(6):686-94. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2011.564353. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
2
Outcome evaluation of 'sharing the gift of life': an organ and tissue donation educational program for American Indians.“分享生命的礼物”的结果评估:一项针对美洲印第安人的器官和组织捐赠教育计划。
Am J Transplant. 2010 Jun;10(6):1453-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03120.x. Epub 2010 May 10.
3
Project ACTS: an intervention to increase organ and tissue donation intentions among African Americans.项目 ACTS:一项旨在提高非裔美国人器官和组织捐赠意愿的干预措施。
Health Educ Behav. 2010 Apr;37(2):264-74. doi: 10.1177/1090198109341725. Epub 2009 Oct 26.
4
Effect of "collaborative requesting" on consent rate for organ donation: randomised controlled trial (ACRE trial).“协作请求”对器官捐赠同意率的影响:随机对照试验(ACRE试验)
BMJ. 2009 Oct 8;339:b3911. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3911.
5
Effects of information, education, and communication training about organ donation for gatekeepers: clerks at the Department of Motor Vehicles and organ donor registries.针对把关人开展的关于器官捐赠的信息、教育及沟通培训的效果:机动车管理部门职员及器官捐赠登记处职员。
Prog Transplant. 2008 Dec;18(4):301-9. doi: 10.1177/152692480801800414.
6
In their own words: the reasons why people will (not) sign an organ donor card.用他们自己的话说:人们愿意(或不愿意)签署器官捐赠卡的原因。
Health Commun. 2008;23(1):23-33. doi: 10.1080/10410230701805158.
7
Sharing the gift of life: an intervention to increase organ and tissue donation for American Indians.分享生命的礼物:一项增加美国印第安人器官和组织捐赠的干预措施。
Prog Transplant. 2007 Dec;17(4):281-7. doi: 10.1177/152692480701700405.
8
African Americans' organ donor intentions: who has used which registration mode to express her or his intentions?非裔美国人的器官捐赠意愿:谁采用了哪种登记方式来表达其意愿?
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 Jan-Feb;14(1):E7-E13. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000303420.83518.65.
9
Design and evaluation of a workplace intervention to promote organ donation.促进器官捐赠的工作场所干预措施的设计与评估。
Prog Transplant. 2006 Sep;16(3):253-9. doi: 10.1177/152692480601600312.
10
Educational web-based intervention for high school students to increase knowledge and promote positive attitudes toward organ donation.针对高中生的基于网络的教育干预措施,以增加知识并促进对器官捐赠的积极态度。
Health Educ Behav. 2006 Dec;33(6):773-86. doi: 10.1177/1090198106288596. Epub 2006 Aug 21.