Rodrigue James R, Fleishman Aaron, Fitzpatrick Sean, Boger Matthew
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (JRR, AF), Harvard Medical School (JRR), Boston, Massachusetts, New England Organ Bank, Waltham, Massachusetts (SF, MB).
Prog Transplant. 2015 Dec;25(4):332-8. doi: 10.7182/pit2015166.
Since nearly all registered organ donors in the United States signed up via a driver's license transaction, motor vehicle (MV) offices represent an important venue for organ donation education.
To evaluate the impact of organ donation video messaging in MV offices.
A 2-group (usual care vs usual care+video messaging) randomized trial with baseline, intervention, and follow-up assessment phases.
Twenty-eight MV offices in Massachusetts.
Usual care comprised education of MV clerks, display of organ donation print materials (ie, posters, brochures, signing mats), and a volunteer ambassador program. The intervention included video messaging with silent (subtitled) segments highlighting individuals affected by donation, playing on a recursive loop on monitors in MV waiting rooms.
Aggregate monthly donor designation rates at MV offices (primary) and percentage of MV customers who registered as donors after viewing the video (secondary).
Controlling for baseline donor designation rate, analysis of covariance showed a significant group effect for intervention phase (F=7.3, P=.01). The usual-care group had a significantly higher aggregate monthly donor designation rate than the intervention group had. In the logistic regression model of customer surveys (n=912), prior donor designation (β=-1.29, odds ratio [OR]=0.27 [95% CI=0.20-0.37], P<.001), white race (β=0.57 OR=1.77 [95% CI=1.23-2.54], P=.002), and viewing the intervention video (β=0.73, OR=1.54 [95% CI=1.24-2.60], P=.01) were statistically significant predictors of donor registration on the day of the survey.
The relatively low uptake of the video intervention by customers most likely contributed to the negative trial finding.
由于美国几乎所有登记在册的器官捐献者都是通过驾照办理业务时登记的,机动车(MV)办公室是进行器官捐献教育的重要场所。
评估MV办公室中器官捐献视频信息的影响。
一项分为两组(常规护理组与常规护理+视频信息组)的随机试验,包括基线、干预和随访评估阶段。
马萨诸塞州的28个MV办公室。
常规护理包括对MV职员进行教育、展示器官捐献印刷材料(如海报、宣传册、签名垫)以及一个志愿者大使项目。干预措施包括播放视频信息,视频中有无声(有字幕)片段突出显示受捐献影响的个人,在MV候诊室的监视器上循环播放。
MV办公室每月的捐献者指定率汇总(主要指标)以及观看视频后登记成为捐献者的MV客户百分比(次要指标)。
在控制基线捐献者指定率的情况下,协方差分析显示干预阶段存在显著的组间效应(F=7.3,P=.01)。常规护理组每月的捐献者指定率汇总显著高于干预组。在客户调查(n=912)的逻辑回归模型中,先前的捐献者指定(β=-1.29,优势比[OR]=0.27 [95% CI=0.20-0.37],P<.001)、白人种族(β=0.57,OR=1.77 [95% CI=1.23-2.54],P=.002)以及观看干预视频(β=0.73,OR=1.54 [95% CI=1.24-2.60],P=.01)是调查当天捐献者登记的统计学显著预测因素。
客户对视频干预的接受程度相对较低很可能是导致试验结果为负面的原因。