Plumb Jennifer C, Stewart Ian, Dahl Joanne, Lundgren Tobias
University of Nevada Reno.
Behav Anal. 2009 Spring;32(1):85-103. doi: 10.1007/BF03392177.
Skinner described behavior analysis as the field of values and purpose. However, he defined these concepts in terms of a history of reinforcement and failed to specify whether and how human and nonhuman values might differ. Human values have been seen as theoretically central within a number of nonbehavioral traditions in psychology, including humanism and positive psychology. However, these approaches have failed to provide explanations of the behavior-environment relations involved in valuing that might allow prediction and influence with respect to this phenomenon. Modern clinical behavior analysis in the form of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), however, succeeds in providing a functional definition of human values that meets this latter criterion. ACT is rooted in behavior analysis and relational frame theory (RFT) and defines values in terms of verbally established motivation. ACT empirical research into values has begun to blossom in recent years, and ACT-RFT researchers are currently investigating the concept at the most basic empirical level as well as in the applied clinical arena, heralding new interest in and insight into values within clinical behavioral psychology.
斯金纳将行为分析描述为价值观与目的的领域。然而,他根据强化历史来定义这些概念,却未能明确人类与非人类的价值观是否以及如何存在差异。在心理学的一些非行为主义传统中,包括人本主义和积极心理学,人类价值观在理论上被视为核心。然而,这些方法未能对价值评估中涉及的行为与环境关系做出解释,而这种解释或许能对这一现象进行预测和施加影响。然而,以接纳与承诺疗法(ACT)形式出现的现代临床行为分析成功地给出了符合后一标准的人类价值观的功能性定义。ACT扎根于行为分析和关系框架理论(RFT),并根据言语确立的动机来定义价值观。近年来,ACT对价值观的实证研究开始蓬勃发展,ACT-RFT的研究人员目前正在最基础的实证层面以及应用临床领域对这一概念进行探究,预示着临床行为心理学对价值观有了新的兴趣和见解。