Université Paris Sud, UMR 8079, Orsay, France.
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e34089. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034089. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
The utility of DNA barcoding for identifying representative specimens of the circumpolar tree genus Fraxinus (56 species) was investigated. We examined the genetic variability of several loci suggested in chloroplast DNA barcode protocols such as matK, rpoB, rpoC1 and trnH-psbA in a large worldwide sample of Fraxinus species. The chloroplast intergenic spacer rpl32-trnL was further assessed in search for a potentially variable and useful locus. The results of the study suggest that the proposed cpDNA loci, alone or in combination, cannot fully discriminate among species because of the generally low rates of substitution in the chloroplast genome of Fraxinus. The intergenic spacer trnH-psbA was the best performing locus, but genetic distance-based discrimination was moderately successful and only resulted in the separation of the samples at the subgenus level. Use of the BLAST approach was better than the neighbor-joining tree reconstruction method with pairwise Kimura's two-parameter rates of substitution, but allowed for the correct identification of only less than half of the species sampled. Such rates are substantially lower than the success rate required for a standardised barcoding approach. Consequently, the current cpDNA barcodes are inadequate to fully discriminate Fraxinus species. Given that a low rate of substitution is common among the plastid genomes of trees, the use of the plant cpDNA "universal" barcode may not be suitable for the safe identification of tree species below a generic or sectional level. Supplementary barcoding loci of the nuclear genome and alternative solutions are proposed and discussed.
研究了 DNA 条形码技术在鉴定环极树属 Fraxinus(56 种)代表性标本中的应用。我们在一个大型的 Fraxinus 物种全球样本中,检测了叶绿体 DNA 条形码方案中建议的几个基因座(matK、rpoB、rpoC1 和 trnH-psbA)的遗传变异性。进一步评估了叶绿体基因间间隔 rpl32-trnL,以寻找一个潜在的可变且有用的基因座。研究结果表明,由于 Fraxinus 叶绿体基因组的替代率普遍较低,所提出的 cpDNA 基因座单独或组合使用都不能完全区分物种。基因间间隔 trnH-psbA 是表现最好的基因座,但基于遗传距离的区分仅取得了中等成功,仅导致亚属水平的样品分离。BLAST 方法优于基于邻接法的系统发育树重建,用 Kimura 的双参数替换率进行成对比较,但仅允许正确识别所采样物种的不到一半。这种替代率远低于标准化条形码方法所需的成功率。因此,目前的 cpDNA 条形码不足以完全区分 Fraxinus 物种。鉴于树的质体基因组中的替代率普遍较低,植物 cpDNA“通用”条形码的使用可能不适合在属或节以下水平安全鉴定树种。本文提出并讨论了核基因组的补充条形码基因座和替代解决方案。