Energy Biosciences Institute , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , Urbana, IL , USA.
Interface Focus. 2011 Apr 6;1(2):212-23. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2010.0023. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
Targets for bioenergy have been set worldwide to mitigate climate change. Although feedstock sources are often ambiguous, pledges in European nations, the United States and Brazil amount to more than 100 Mtoe of biorenewable fuel production by 2020. As a consequence, the biofuel sector is developing rapidly, and it is increasingly important to distinguish bioenergy options that can address energy security and greenhouse gas mitigation from those that cannot. This paper evaluates how bioenergy production affects land-use change (LUC), and to what extent land-use modelling can inform sound decision-making. We identified local and global internalities and externalities of biofuel development scenarios, reviewed relevant data sources and modelling approaches, identified sources of controversy about indirect LUC (iLUC) and then suggested a framework for comprehensive assessments of bioenergy. Ultimately, plant biomass must be managed to produce energy in a way that is consistent with the management of food, feed, fibre, timber and environmental services. Bioenergy production provides opportunities for improved energy security, climate mitigation and rural development, but the environmental and social consequences depend on feedstock choices and geographical location. The most desirable solutions for bioenergy production will include policies that incentivize regionally integrated management of diverse resources with low inputs, high yields, co-products, multiple benefits and minimal risks of iLUC. Many integrated assessment models include energy resources, trade, technological development and regional environmental conditions, but do not account for biodiversity and lack detailed data on the location of degraded and underproductive lands that would be ideal for bioenergy production. Specific practices that would maximize the benefits of bioenergy production regionally need to be identified before a global analysis of bioenergy-related LUC can be accomplished.
目标为生物能源已在全球范围内设定,以减轻气候变化。虽然原料来源往往不明确,但欧洲国家、美国和巴西的承诺是到 2020 年生产超过 10 亿公吨的生物可再生燃料。因此,生物燃料部门正在迅速发展,区分能够解决能源安全和温室气体减排问题的生物能源选择与不能解决这些问题的生物能源选择变得越来越重要。本文评估了生物能源生产如何影响土地利用变化(LUC),以及土地利用建模在多大程度上可以为合理决策提供信息。我们确定了生物燃料发展情景的本地和全球内在性和外在性,审查了相关数据源和建模方法,确定了间接土地利用变化(iLUC)的争议来源,然后提出了一个全面评估生物能源的框架。最终,植物生物质必须得到管理,以便以与管理食物、饲料、纤维、木材和环境服务一致的方式生产能源。生物能源生产提供了改善能源安全、气候缓解和农村发展的机会,但环境和社会后果取决于原料选择和地理位置。生物能源生产最理想的解决方案将包括鼓励以低投入、高产量、副产品、多种效益和最小 iLUC 风险为特征的区域综合管理多样化资源的政策。许多综合评估模型包括能源资源、贸易、技术发展和区域环境条件,但不考虑生物多样性,也缺乏关于退化和低产土地位置的详细数据,这些土地非常适合生物能源生产。在完成与生物能源相关的土地利用变化的全球分析之前,需要确定能够在区域范围内最大限度地提高生物能源生产效益的具体做法。