de Jong Sierk, Antonissen Kay, Hoefnagels Ric, Lonza Laura, Wang Michael, Faaij André, Junginger Martin
Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.
European Commission-Directorate for Energy, Transport and Climate, Sustainable Transport Unit, EC-Joint Research Centre, Via E. Fermi 2749, 27027 Ispra, Italy.
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017 Mar 14;10:64. doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-0739-7. eCollection 2017.
The introduction of renewable jet fuel (RJF) is considered an important emission mitigation measure for the aviation industry. This study compares the well-to-wake (WtWa) greenhouse gas (GHG) emission performance of multiple RJF conversion pathways and explores the impact of different co-product allocation methods. The insights obtained in this study are of particular importance if RJF is included as an emission mitigation instrument in the global Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA).
Fischer-Tropsch pathways yield the highest GHG emission reduction compared to fossil jet fuel (86-104%) of the pathways in scope, followed by Hydrothermal Liquefaction (77-80%) and sugarcane- (71-75%) and corn stover-based Alcohol-to-Jet (60-75%). Feedstock cultivation, hydrogen and conversion inputs were shown to be major contributors to the overall WtWa GHG emission performance. The choice of allocation method mainly affects pathways yielding high shares of co-products or producing co-products which effectively displace carbon intensive products (e.g., electricity).
Renewable jet fuel can contribute to significant reduction of aviation-related GHG emissions, provided the right feedstock and conversion technology are used. The GHG emission performance of RJF may be further improved by using sustainable hydrogen sources or applying carbon capture and storage. Based on the character and impact of different co-product allocation methods, we recommend using energy and economic allocation (for non-energy co-products) at a global level, as it leverages the universal character of energy allocation while adequately valuing non-energy co-products.
可再生喷气燃料(RJF)的引入被认为是航空业一项重要的减排措施。本研究比较了多种RJF转化途径的从原料到尾迹(WtWa)温室气体(GHG)排放性能,并探讨了不同副产品分配方法的影响。如果将RJF纳入全球国际航空碳抵消和减排计划(CORSIA)的减排工具中,本研究获得的见解将尤为重要。
与范围内的化石喷气燃料相比,费托合成途径的温室气体减排量最高(86%-104%),其次是水热液化(77%-80%)以及甘蔗基(71%-75%)和玉米秸秆基醇制喷气燃料(60%-75%)。原料种植、氢气和转化投入被证明是总体WtWa温室气体排放性能的主要贡献因素。分配方法的选择主要影响那些产生高比例副产品或生产能有效替代高碳产品(如电力)的副产品的途径。
只要使用合适的原料和转化技术,可再生喷气燃料有助于大幅减少与航空相关的温室气体排放。通过使用可持续氢源或应用碳捕获与封存技术,RJF的温室气体排放性能可能会进一步提高。基于不同副产品分配方法的特点和影响,我们建议在全球层面使用能量和经济分配法(针对非能源副产品),因为它利用了能量分配的通用性,同时充分重视非能源副产品。