• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

受伤驾驶员中酒精和其他精神活性物质的流行情况:比利时和荷兰的比较。

Prevalence of alcohol and other psychoactive substances in injured drivers: comparison between Belgium and The Netherlands.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Chemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Jul 10;220(1-3):224-31. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.03.006
PMID:22483531
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the prevalence of alcohol and (il)licit drugs in seriously injured drivers in Belgium (BE) and the Netherlands (NL).

METHODS

Injured car and van drivers admitted to the emergency departments of five hospitals in Belgium and three in the Netherlands from January 2008 to May 2010 were included. Blood samples were taken and analysed for ethanol (with an enzymatic method) and 22 other psychoactive substances (UPLC-MS/MS or GC-MS).

RESULTS

In total 535 injured drivers were included in the study (BE: 348; NL: 187). More drivers were found positive for alcohol and drugs in Belgium (52.6%) than in the Netherlands (33.9%). Alcohol (≥0.1 g/L) was the most prevalent substance in both countries (BE: 42.5%; NL: 29.6%). A similar prevalence was found for amphetamine (BE: 2.6%; NL: 2.2%) and cocaine (BE: 2.3%; NL: 2.1%). In the Netherlands almost no positive findings for cannabis were recorded (0.5%). No driver tested positive for benzodiazepines in the Netherlands compared to 7.3% in Belgium. More injured drivers tested positive for Z-drugs (BE: 1.8%; NL: 0.5%) and medicinal opioids (BE: 3.3%; NL: 0.5%) in Belgium.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of alcohol in seriously injured drivers was 12% higher found in Belgium than in the Netherlands. The prevalence of drugs was similar in both countries except for THC and medicinal drugs, particularly benzodiazepines, with a much higher prevalence in Belgium. In comparison to previous survey there were differences in the prevalence of THC, benzodiazepines and combinations of drugs. Possible explanations are the different matrix used, a bias in study population, or in case of illicit opiates and benzodiazepines a different consumption pattern in the two countries. Alcohol is still the most prevalent substance among the injured driver population and this increased the last 15 years.

摘要

研究目的

比较比利时(BE)和荷兰(NL)严重受伤驾驶员中酒精和(非法)药物的流行率。

方法

纳入 2008 年 1 月至 2010 年 5 月期间,比利时五家医院和荷兰三家医院急诊科收治的受伤汽车和货车驾驶员。采集血样,用酶法检测乙醇(Ethanol),并用 UPLC-MS/MS 或 GC-MS 检测 22 种其他精神活性物质。

结果

共纳入 535 名受伤驾驶员(BE:348;NL:187)。比利时(52.6%)发现的阳性驾驶员比荷兰(33.9%)多。两国最常见的物质都是酒精(≥0.1 g/L)(BE:42.5%;NL:29.6%)。安非他命(Amphetamine)和可卡因(Cocaine)的流行率相似(BE:2.6%;NL:2.2%)。在荷兰,几乎没有检测到大麻呈阳性(0.5%)。与比利时(7.3%)相比,荷兰没有驾驶员的苯二氮䓬类检测呈阳性。在比利时,接受 Z 药物(Z-drugs)检测的受伤驾驶员比例更高(BE:1.8%;NL:0.5%)和医用阿片类药物(BE:3.3%;NL:0.5%)。

结论

与荷兰相比,比利时严重受伤驾驶员中酒精的流行率高出 12%。除大麻和医用药物外,两国的药物流行率相似,特别是苯二氮䓬类药物,在比利时的流行率更高。与以前的调查相比,THC、苯二氮䓬类药物和药物组合的流行率有所不同。可能的解释是使用了不同的基质、研究人群的偏差,或者在非法阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物方面,两国的消费模式不同。酒精仍然是受伤驾驶员人群中最常见的物质,而且在过去 15 年中有所增加。

相似文献

1
Prevalence of alcohol and other psychoactive substances in injured drivers: comparison between Belgium and The Netherlands.受伤驾驶员中酒精和其他精神活性物质的流行情况:比利时和荷兰的比较。
Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Jul 10;220(1-3):224-31. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
2
Psychoactive substances in seriously injured drivers in Denmark.丹麦严重受伤驾驶员中的精神活性物质。
Forensic Sci Int. 2013 Jan 10;224(1-3):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.10.025. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
3
Presence of psychoactive substances in injured Belgian drivers.受伤的比利时司机体内存在精神活性物质。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(5):461-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.716881.
4
Prevalence of psychoactive substances, alcohol, illicit drugs, and medicines, in Spanish drivers: a roadside study.西班牙驾驶员中精神活性物质、酒精、非法药物和药物的流行情况:一项路边研究。
Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Nov 30;223(1-3):106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.08.012. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
5
Risk of severe driver injury by driving with psychoactive substances.因使用精神活性物质驾驶而导致严重驾驶员伤害的风险。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Oct;59:346-56. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jun 8.
6
First nationwide study on driving under the influence of drugs in Switzerland.瑞士首次全国范围内的药物影响下驾驶研究。
Forensic Sci Int. 2010 May 20;198(1-3):11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.014. Epub 2010 Mar 7.
7
Prevalence of alcohol and other substances of abuse among injured patients in a Norwegian emergency department.挪威急诊部门受伤患者中酒精和其他滥用物质的流行情况。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Sep 1;117(2-3):132-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.01.007. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
8
Prevalence of ethanol and illicit drugs in road traffic accidents in the centre of Portugal: An eighteen-year update.葡萄牙中部道路交通事故中乙醇和非法药物的流行情况:十八年的更新。
Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Mar 10;216(1-3):37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.08.013. Epub 2011 Sep 10.
9
The prevalence of drugs in injured drivers.受伤驾驶员中药物的流行情况。
Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Feb 10;215(1-3):14-7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.01.040. Epub 2011 Mar 5.
10
Comparison of drug concentrations measured in roadside surveys and in seriously injured drivers in Belgium.比利时路边调查和严重受伤驾驶员体内药物浓度的比较。
Drug Test Anal. 2013 Jul;5(7):541-8. doi: 10.1002/dta.1436. Epub 2012 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of motor vehicle operator performance assessments for benzodiazepine receptor agonists.苯二氮䓬受体激动剂机动车驾驶员性能评估的范围综述
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Nov 9;16:100538. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100538. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Positive drug test trends in fatally-injured drivers in the United States from 2007 to 2017.2007 年至 2017 年美国致命事故驾驶员药物检测呈阳性趋势。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2019 Oct 25;14(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13011-019-0228-z.
3
The prevalence of alcohol and illicit drug use among injured patients presenting to the emergency department of a national hospital in Tanzania: a prospective cohort study.
坦桑尼亚一家国立医院急诊科受伤患者中酒精和非法药物使用的患病率:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Jan 24;19(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0222-9.
4
Alcohol consumption for simulated driving performance: A systematic review.饮酒对模拟驾驶性能的影响:一项系统综述。
Chin J Traumatol. 2017 Jun;20(3):166-172. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
5
Alcohol Interactions with Psychostimulants: An Overview of Animal and Human Studies.酒精与精神兴奋剂的相互作用:动物和人体研究综述
J Addict Res Ther. 2016 Jun;7(3). doi: 10.4172/2155-6105.1000281. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
6
Exploring functional data analysis and wavelet principal component analysis on ecstasy (MDMA) wastewater data.探索摇头丸(MDMA)废水数据的功能数据分析和小波主成分分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Jul 12;16:81. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0179-2.
7
Prevalence of alcohol and drug use in injured British Columbia drivers.不列颠哥伦比亚省受伤驾驶员中酒精和药物使用的患病率。
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 10;6(3):e009278. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009278.
8
Wastewater-Based Epidemiology of Stimulant Drugs: Functional Data Analysis Compared to Traditional Statistical Methods.基于废水的兴奋剂药物流行病学:与传统统计方法相比的功能数据分析
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 22;10(9):e0138669. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138669. eCollection 2015.
9
Alcohol and Drug Use in Injured Drivers - An Emergency Room Study in a Regional Tertiary Care Centre of North West India.受伤驾驶员的酒精和药物使用情况——印度西北部一家地区三级护理中心的急诊室研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jul;9(7):HC01-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14840.6239. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
10
Comparative study of the impact of intoxication on injuries in china and Korea.中国与韩国中毒对损伤影响的比较研究
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2015 Feb;6(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.phrp.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Jan 30.