Suppr超能文献

用于诊断肺外结核的干扰素-γ释放试验:系统评价与荟萃分析

Interferon-gamma release assays for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Fan Lin, Chen Zhou, Hao Xiao-Hui, Hu Zhong-Yi, Xiao He-Ping

机构信息

Tuberculosis Center for Diagnosis and Treatment, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2012 Aug;65(3):456-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00972.x. Epub 2012 Jun 18.

Abstract

Interferon -gamma release assays (IGRAs) provide a new diagnostic method for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) infection. However, the diagnostic value of IGRAs for extrapulmonary TB (EPTB) has not been clarified. We searched several databases and selected papers with strict inclusion criteria, evaluated the evidence of commercially available IGRAs (QuantiFERON(®) -TB Gold QFT-G or QFT-GIT and T-SPOT(®) .TB) on blood and the tuberculin skin test (TST) using random effects models. Twenty studies with 1711 patients were included. After excluding indeterminate results, pooled sensitivity for the diagnosis of EPTB was 72% [95% confidence interval (CI) 65-79%] for QFT-G or GIT and 90% (95% CI, 86-93%) for T-SPOT; in high-income countries the sensitivity of QFT-G or GIT (79%, 95% CI 72-86%) was much higher than that (29%, 95% CI 14-48%) in low/middle-income countries. Pooled specificity for EPTB was 82% (95% CI 78-87%) for QFT-G or GIT and 68% (95% CI 64-73%) for T-SPOT. Pooled sensitivity of TST from four studies in high-income countries was lower than that of IGRAs. T-SPOT was more sensitive in detecting EPTB than QFT-G or GIT and TST. However, both IGRAs and TST have similar specificity for EPTB. IGRAs have limited value as diagnostic tools to screen and rule out EPTB, especially in low/middle-income countries. The immune status of patients does not affect the diagnostic accuracy of IGRAs for EPTB.

摘要

干扰素-γ释放试验(IGRAs)为结核分枝杆菌(TB)感染提供了一种新的诊断方法。然而,IGRAs对肺外结核(EPTB)的诊断价值尚未明确。我们检索了多个数据库,并选择了符合严格纳入标准的论文,使用随机效应模型评估了市售IGRAs(QuantiFERON®-TB Gold QFT-G或QFT-GIT以及T-SPOT®.TB)对血液的诊断证据以及结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)。纳入了20项研究,共1711例患者。排除不确定结果后,QFT-G或GIT诊断EPTB的合并敏感性为72%[95%置信区间(CI)65-79%],T-SPOT为90%(95%CI,86-93%);在高收入国家,QFT-G或GIT的敏感性(79%,9%CI 72-86%)远高于低收入/中等收入国家(29%,95%CI 14-48%)。QFT-G或GIT诊断EPTB的合并特异性为82%(95%CI 78-87%),T-SPOT为68%(9%CI 64-73%)。来自高收入国家的四项研究中TST的合并敏感性低于IGRAs。T-SPOT在检测EPTB方面比QFT-G或GIT以及TST更敏感。然而,IGRAs和TST对EPTB的特异性相似。IGRAs作为筛查和排除EPTB的诊断工具价值有限,尤其是在低收入/中等收入国家。患者的免疫状态不影响IGRAs对EPTB的诊断准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验