• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有自行制定分娩计划的女性的产科结局

Obstetrical outcome in women with self-prepared birth plan.

作者信息

Hadar Eran, Raban Oded, Gal Bracha, Yogev Yariv, Melamed Nir

机构信息

Helen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Oct;25(10):2055-7. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.678438. Epub 2012 Apr 21.

DOI:10.3109/14767058.2012.678438
PMID:22489709
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether introducing a pre-prepared birth plan upon labor admission has an impact on obstetrical outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all women who prepared an ante-partum birth plan, from 2007-2010. Outcome was compared with a control group consisting of women without a birth plan matched by age, parity and gestational week in a 3:1 ratio.

RESULTS

154 women were compared to a matched control group of 462 women. Women preparing a birth plan, were less likely to undergo an intra partum cesarean section (11.7% vs. 20.3%, p = 0.016). First and second degree perineal tears occurred more frequently in women preparing a birth plan (72.1% vs. 25.5%, p < 0.001). The utilization of birth plan was also associated with a higher rate of epidural administration (81.2% vs. 68.8%, p = 0.004) and a lower rate of intravenous analgesics use (1.3% vs. 10.2%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Women presenting with a birth plan, compared to an age-, parity- and gestational week- matched control group are less likely to undergo a cesarean section, more likely to have first and second degree perineal tears and more likely to use an epidural. The paucity of data and the mis-concepts of medical staff suggest that larger prospective studies are needed.

摘要

目的

确定分娩入院时引入预先制定的分娩计划是否会对产科结局产生影响。

方法

对2007年至2010年期间所有制定产前分娩计划的女性进行回顾性研究。将结局与一个由未制定分娩计划的女性组成的对照组进行比较,对照组按年龄、产次和孕周以3:1的比例匹配。

结果

154名女性与462名匹配的对照组女性进行了比较。制定分娩计划的女性接受产时剖宫产的可能性较小(11.7%对20.3%,p = 0.016)。制定分娩计划的女性发生一度和二度会阴撕裂的频率更高(72.1%对25.5%,p < 0.001)。分娩计划的使用还与更高的硬膜外给药率(81.2%对68.8%,p = 0.004)和更低的静脉镇痛药物使用率(1.3%对10.2%,p < 0.001)相关。

结论

与年龄、产次和孕周匹配的对照组相比,制定分娩计划的女性剖宫产的可能性较小,一度和二度会阴撕裂的可能性更大,使用硬膜外麻醉的可能性更大。数据的匮乏和医务人员的误解表明需要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究。

相似文献

1
Obstetrical outcome in women with self-prepared birth plan.有自行制定分娩计划的女性的产科结局
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Oct;25(10):2055-7. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.678438. Epub 2012 Apr 21.
2
Patients presenting with birth plans: a case-control study of delivery outcomes.呈现分娩计划的患者:分娩结局的病例对照研究
J Reprod Med. 2007 Oct;52(10):884-7.
3
Mode of delivery after epidural analgesia in a cohort of low-risk nulliparas.低危初产妇人群行硬膜外分娩镇痛后的分娩方式。
Birth. 2011 Dec;38(4):317-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2011.00486.x. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
4
The effect of epidural analgesia on the occurrence of obstetric lacerations and on the neonatal outcome during spontaneous vaginal delivery.硬膜外镇痛对自然阴道分娩时产科裂伤的发生及新生儿结局的影响。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2002 Dec;267(2):81-4. doi: 10.1007/s00404-001-0280-5.
5
Does epidural versus combined spinal-epidural analgesia prolong labor and increase the risk of instrumental and cesarean delivery in nulliparous women?对于未产妇,硬膜外镇痛与腰麻-硬膜外联合镇痛相比,是否会延长产程并增加器械助产和剖宫产的风险?
J Clin Anesth. 2009 Mar;21(2):94-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.06.020.
6
[Efficacy and delivery outcomes of women underwent double-catheter epidural block during labor].[分娩期间接受双导管硬膜外阻滞的女性的疗效及分娩结局]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Nov;45(11):819-24.
7
Regardless of where they give birth, women living in non-metropolitan areas are less likely to have an epidural than their metropolitan counterparts.无论在哪里分娩,生活在非大都市地区的女性使用硬膜外麻醉的可能性都低于大都市的女性。
Women Birth. 2013 Jun;26(2):e77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2012.12.001. Epub 2012 Dec 29.
8
Have women become more willing to accept obstetric interventions and does this relate to mode of birth? Data from a prospective study.女性是否更愿意接受产科干预措施,这与分娩方式有关吗?一项前瞻性研究的数据。
Birth. 2007 Mar;34(1):6-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00140.x.
9
Length of the second stage of labor as a predictor of perineal outcome after vaginal delivery.产程第二阶段的时长作为阴道分娩后会阴结局的预测指标。
J Reprod Med. 2006 Feb;51(2):115-9.
10
Anesthesia and analgesia-related preferences and outcomes of women who have birth plans.有分娩计划的女性的麻醉和镇痛相关偏好及结果。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;56(4):376-381. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00032.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Maternal-infant outcomes of birth planning: A review study.生育计划的母婴结局:一项综述研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Sep 29;12:315. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1450_22. eCollection 2023.
2
Effect of birth plans integrated into childbirth preparation classes on maternal and neonatal outcomes of Iranian women: A randomized controlled trial.纳入分娩准备课程的分娩计划对伊朗妇女母婴结局的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Apr 6;4:1120335. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1120335. eCollection 2023.
3
Birth plan presentation to hospitals and its relation to obstetric outcomes and selected pain relief methods during childbirth.
向医院提交分娩计划及其与产科结局的关系,以及分娩期间选择的止痛方法。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Apr 1;21(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03739-z.
4
Association between Birth Plan Use and Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Southern Spain: A Case-Control Study.西班牙南部出生计划的使用与母婴结局的相关性:病例对照研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 8;18(2):456. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020456.
5
Birth plan compliance and its relation to maternal and neonatal outcomes.分娩计划的依从性及其与孕产妇和新生儿结局的关系。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2017 Dec 11;25:e2953. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2007.2953.
6
Patient Communication, Satisfaction, and Trust Before and After Use of a Standardized Birth Plan.使用标准化分娩计划前后的患者沟通、满意度和信任度。
Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2017 Nov;76(11):305-309.
7
Use and influence of Delivery and Birth Plans in the humanizing delivery process.分娩计划在人性化分娩过程中的使用与影响。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2015 May-Jun;23(3):520-6. doi: 10.1590/0104-1169.0067.2583. Epub 2015 Jul 3.