• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

向医院提交分娩计划及其与产科结局的关系,以及分娩期间选择的止痛方法。

Birth plan presentation to hospitals and its relation to obstetric outcomes and selected pain relief methods during childbirth.

机构信息

Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare Services (ASSIR), Catalan Health Institute (ICS), Gran Via de les Corts Catalans, 587, 08006, Barcelona, Spain.

Cap Sant Felix, Carretera de Barcelona 473, 08206, Sabadell Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Apr 1;21(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03739-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-021-03739-z
PMID:33794803
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8017698/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The information on birth plan (BP) usage in Spanish hospitals is scant.

AIM

To identify the percentage of pregnant women presenting a BP at five hospitals in Spain, the reasons why some women failed to do so and how BP presentation relates to obstetric outcomes and selected pain relief methods.

METHODS

In this descriptive, multi-centre study, data were retrospectively collected. During the postpartum visits at primary healthcare centres in various health districts in Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain), a data collection sheet about obstetric outcomes and analgesia was administered to 432 mothers who had completed a BP during their pregnancies. The main outcome was the rate of BP presentation to the hospital. The sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics and pain relief measures were compared to identify any differences between mothers who presented a BP and those who did not.

RESULTS

A total of 422 (99.7%) women were studied; 51.2% of women (95% confidence interval (CI): 46.4-55.9) had presented a BP. The main reason for not presenting a BP was because the hospital midwives did not request them (61.2%). No differences were observed in BP presentation according to age, the country of origin, education, employment or hospital. Mothers who presented a BP were more likely to start breastfeeding in the birthing room (82.4% vs. 73.3%; p = 0.024). Epidural analgesia was the most common method used for pain relief (88.9%), and women who presented a BP attempted to use concomitant non-pharmacological methods more often (50.5% vs. 38.8%; p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Almost half of the mothers failed to present a BP, usually because midwives did not request it.

摘要

背景

西班牙医院的生育计划(BP)使用信息很少。

目的

确定西班牙五家医院的孕妇 BP 使用率,无法完成 BP 的孕妇的原因,以及 BP 呈现与产科结局和选定的止痛方法的关系。

方法

在这项描述性的多中心研究中,回顾性地收集了数据。在巴塞罗那不同卫生区的基层医疗中心的产后访视中,向 432 名已在孕期完成 BP 的母亲发放了一份关于产科结局和镇痛的数据收集表。主要结局是医院 BP 的呈现率。比较社会人口学和产科特征以及止痛措施,以确定呈现 BP 和不呈现 BP 的母亲之间的任何差异。

结果

共研究了 422 名(99.7%)妇女;51.2%的妇女(95%置信区间(CI):46.4-55.9)呈现了 BP。不呈现 BP 的主要原因是医院助产士没有要求(61.2%)。根据年龄、原籍国、教育、就业或医院,未观察到 BP 呈现的差异。呈现 BP 的母亲更有可能在分娩室开始母乳喂养(82.4% vs. 73.3%;p=0.024)。硬膜外镇痛是最常用的止痛方法(88.9%),呈现 BP 的妇女更常尝试使用伴随的非药物方法(50.5% vs. 38.8%;p=0.012)。

结论

几乎一半的母亲未能呈现 BP,通常是因为助产士没有要求。

相似文献

1
Birth plan presentation to hospitals and its relation to obstetric outcomes and selected pain relief methods during childbirth.向医院提交分娩计划及其与产科结局的关系,以及分娩期间选择的止痛方法。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Apr 1;21(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03739-z.
2
Effectiveness of birth plan counselling based on shared decision making: A cluster randomized controlled trial (APLANT).基于共同决策的分娩计划咨询的效果:一项整群随机对照试验(APLANT)。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 12;17(9):e0274240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274240. eCollection 2022.
3
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.由助产士主导的连续性照护模式与针对育龄妇女的其他照护模式对比。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 15(9):CD004667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub4.
4
Dutch women in midwife-led care at the onset of labour: which pain relief do they prefer and what do they use?荷兰妇女在分娩开始时接受助产士主导的护理:她们更喜欢哪种止痛方法,又使用了哪种方法?
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Dec 10;13:230. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-230.
5
Exploring the medicalisation of childbirth through women's preferences for and use of pain relief.探讨通过女性对疼痛缓解的偏好和使用来实现分娩的医学化。
Women Birth. 2021 Mar;34(2):e118-e127. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
6
Hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth.分娩过程中疼痛管理的催眠疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 19;2016(5):CD009356. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009356.pub3.
7
Transfer from primary maternity unit to tertiary hospital in New Zealand - timing, frequency, reasons, urgency and outcomes: Part of the Evaluating Maternity Units study.新西兰从初级产科单位转诊至三级医院——时间、频率、原因、紧迫性及结果:评估产科单位研究的一部分
Midwifery. 2015 Sep;31(9):879-87. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.04.018. Epub 2015 May 5.
8
Intrapartum Care and Experiences of Women with Midwives Versus Obstetricians in the Listening to Mothers in California Survey.产妇在加利福尼亚倾听母亲调查中与助产士和产科医生的分娩护理和体验。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Jan;65(1):45-55. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13027. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
9
Experience of childbirth in birth center care. A randomized controlled study.分娩中心护理中的分娩体验。一项随机对照研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994 Aug;73(7):547-54. doi: 10.3109/00016349409006271.
10
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour.分娩时硬膜外镇痛与非硬膜外镇痛或无镇痛的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Profiles of obstetric interventions during COVID-19 and advocacy for Sustainable Development Goals.2019年冠状病毒病期间的产科干预措施概况及对可持续发展目标的倡导
Rev Bras Enferm. 2025 Jun 27;78Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e20240135. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0135. eCollection 2025.
2
The childbirth experiences of Iranian women with birth plans.有分娩计划的伊朗女性的分娩经历。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 6;10(17):e37555. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37555. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
3
Maternal-infant outcomes of birth planning: A review study.生育计划的母婴结局:一项综述研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Sep 29;12:315. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1450_22. eCollection 2023.
4
Desired versus actual delivery route: nursing students' perception about their type of delivery.期望与实际分娩途径:护理学生对自己分娩类型的看法。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2022 Dec 5;56:e20220217. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0217en. eCollection 2022.
5
Effect of implementing a birth plan on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.实施分娩计划对母婴结局的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Nov 22;22(1):862. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05199-5.
6
Effectiveness of birth plan counselling based on shared decision making: A cluster randomized controlled trial (APLANT).基于共同决策的分娩计划咨询的效果:一项整群随机对照试验(APLANT)。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 12;17(9):e0274240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274240. eCollection 2022.
7
The Birth Plan Experience-A Pilot Qualitative Study in Southern Spain.分娩计划体验——西班牙南部的一项定性研究试点
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jan 4;10(1):95. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10010095.

本文引用的文献

1
Mixed-methods systematic review: Childbearing women's views, experiences, and decision-making related to epidural analgesia in labour.混合方法系统评价:分娩妇女对产程中硬膜外镇痛的看法、经验和决策。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Dec;76(12):3273-3292. doi: 10.1111/jan.14555. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
2
Prevalence, characteristics, and satisfaction of women with a birth plan in The Netherlands.荷兰有生育计划的女性的流行率、特征和满意度。
Birth. 2019 Dec;46(4):686-692. doi: 10.1111/birt.12451. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
3
Birth Plans and Childbirth Education: What Are Provider Attitudes, Beliefs, and Practices?分娩计划与分娩教育:医护人员的态度、观念及做法是怎样的?
J Perinat Educ. 2019 Jan 1;28(1):10-18. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.28.1.10.
4
Birth Plans: Encouraging Patient Engagement.分娩计划:鼓励患者参与
J Perinat Educ. 2016;25(4):215-222. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.25.4.215.
5
Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Methods of Labour Pain Relief-Establishment of Effectiveness and Comparison.分娩镇痛的药理学和非药理学方法——有效性的确立与比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 9;15(12):2792. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122792.
6
The effect of prenatal education classes on the birth expectations of Spanish women.产前教育课程对西班牙女性生育期望的影响。
Midwifery. 2018 May;60:41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
7
Sequential application of non-pharmacological interventions reduces the severity of labour pain, delays use of pharmacological analgesia, and improves some obstetric outcomes: a randomised trial.序贯应用非药物干预措施可减轻分娩疼痛的严重程度,延迟药物镇痛的使用,并改善一些产科结局:一项随机试验。
J Physiother. 2018 Jan;64(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
8
Birth plan compliance and its relation to maternal and neonatal outcomes.分娩计划的依从性及其与孕产妇和新生儿结局的关系。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2017 Dec 11;25:e2953. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2007.2953.
9
Birth plans-Impact on mode of delivery, obstetrical interventions, and birth experience satisfaction: A prospective cohort study.分娩计划——对分娩方式、产科干预措施及分娩体验满意度的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Birth. 2018 Mar;45(1):43-49. doi: 10.1111/birt.12320. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
10
A critical review of the birth plan use in Catalonia.对加泰罗尼亚地区分娩计划使用情况的批判性综述。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2017 Oct;13:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jun 11.