Suppr超能文献

验证卵巢癌分子亚型对结局的影响:OVCAD 联盟的一项研究。

Validating the impact of a molecular subtype in ovarian cancer on outcomes: a study of the OVCAD Consortium.

机构信息

Molecular Oncology Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna.

出版信息

Cancer Sci. 2012 Jul;103(7):1334-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02306.x. Epub 2012 May 17.

Abstract

Most patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are diagnosed at advanced stage and have a poor prognosis. However, a small proportion of these patients will survive, whereas others will die very quickly. Clinicopathological factors do not allow precise identification of these subgroups. Thus, we have validated a molecular subclassification as new prognostic factor in EOC. One hundred and ninety-four patients with Stage II-IV EOC were characterized by whole-genome expression profiling of tumor tissues and were classified using a published 112 gene set, derived from an International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage-directed supervised classification approach. The 194 tumor samples were classified into two subclasses comprising 95 (Subclass 1) and 99 (Subclass 2) tumors. All nine FIGO II tumors were grouped in Subclass 1 (P = 0.001). Subclass 2 (54% of advanced-stage tumors) was significantly correlated with peritoneal carcinomatosis and non-optimal debulking. Patients with Subclass 2 tumors had a worse overall survival for both serous and non-serous histological subtypes, as revealed by univariate analysis (hazard ratios [HR] of 3.17 and 17.11, respectively; P ≤ 0.001) and in models corrected for relevant clinicopathologic parameters (HR 2.87 and 12.42, respectively; P ≤ 0.023). Significance analysis of microarrays revealed 2082 genes that were differentially expressed in advanced-grade serous tumors of both subclasses and the focal adhesion pathway as the most deregulated pathway. In the present validation study, we have shown that, in advanced-stage serous ovarian cancer, two approximately equally large molecular subtypes exist, independent of classical clinocopathological parameters and presenting with highly different whole-genome expression profiles and a markedly different overall survival. Similar results were obtained in a small cohort of patients with non-serous tumors.

摘要

大多数上皮性卵巢癌 (EOC) 患者在晚期被诊断出,预后不良。然而,其中一小部分患者会存活,而另一些患者则会很快死亡。临床病理因素无法准确识别这些亚组。因此,我们已经验证了一种分子亚分类作为 EOC 的新预后因素。194 名 II-IV 期 EOC 患者的肿瘤组织进行了全基因组表达谱分析,并使用已发表的 112 个基因集进行了分类,该基因集源自国际妇产科联盟 (FIGO) 指导的基于分期的监督分类方法。194 个肿瘤样本分为两个亚类,包括 95 个(亚类 1)和 99 个(亚类 2)肿瘤。所有 9 个 FIGO II 肿瘤均被归类为亚类 1(P = 0.001)。亚类 2(54%的晚期肿瘤)与腹膜癌病和非最佳减瘤密切相关。单因素分析显示,亚类 2 肿瘤患者的整体存活率在浆液性和非浆液性组织学亚型中均较差(危险比 [HR]分别为 3.17 和 17.11;P ≤ 0.001),并在校正了相关临床病理参数的模型中(HR 分别为 2.87 和 12.42;P ≤ 0.023)。微阵列差异分析显示,在两个亚类的高级别浆液性肿瘤中,有 2082 个基因表达存在差异,其中粘着斑通路是最失调的通路。在本验证研究中,我们已经表明,在晚期浆液性卵巢癌中,存在两个大致相等大小的分子亚型,与经典临床病理参数无关,具有高度不同的全基因组表达谱和明显不同的整体存活率。在一小部分非浆液性肿瘤患者中也获得了类似的结果。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
A Prognostic Model Based on Metabolism-Related Genes for Patients with Ovarian Cancer.基于代谢相关基因的卵巢癌患者预后模型。
Dokl Biochem Biophys. 2023 Jun;510(1):110-122. doi: 10.1134/S1607672923600082. Epub 2023 Aug 15.

本文引用的文献

2
Cancer statistics, 2012.癌症统计数据,2012 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Jan-Feb;62(1):10-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.20138. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
3
Optimal primary surgical treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.晚期上皮性卵巢癌的最佳初次手术治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Aug 10;2011(8):CD007565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007565.pub2.
4
Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma.卵巢癌的综合基因组分析。
Nature. 2011 Jun 29;474(7353):609-15. doi: 10.1038/nature10166.
8
Calculator for ovarian carcinoma subtype prediction.卵巢癌亚型预测计算器。
Mod Pathol. 2011 Apr;24(4):512-21. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.215. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验