• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生命体征对脓毒症早期诊断及严重程度的重要性:脓毒症患者生命体征与序贯器官衰竭评估评分之间的关联

Importance of vital signs to the early diagnosis and severity of sepsis: association between vital signs and sequential organ failure assessment score in patients with sepsis.

作者信息

Kenzaka Tsuneaki, Okayama Masanobu, Kuroki Shigehiro, Fukui Miho, Yahata Shinsuke, Hayashi Hiroki, Kitao Akihito, Sugiyama Daisuke, Kajii Eiji, Hashimoto Masayoshi

机构信息

Division of General Medicine, Center for Community Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Japan.

出版信息

Intern Med. 2012;51(8):871-6. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.51.6951. Epub 2012 Apr 15.

DOI:10.2169/internalmedicine.51.6951
PMID:22504241
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

While much attention is given to the fifth vital sign, the utility of the 4 classic vital signs (blood pressure, respiratory rate, body temperature, and heart rate) has been neglected. The aim of this study was to assess a possible association between vital signs and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in patients with sepsis.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, observational study of 206 patients with sepsis. Blood pressure, respiratory rate, body temperature, and heart rate were measured on arrival at the hospital. The SOFA score was also determined on the day of admission.

RESULTS

Bivariate correlation analysis showed that all of the vital signs were correlated with the SOFA score. Multiple regression analysis indicated that decreased values of systolic blood pressure (multivariate regression coefficient [Coef] = -0.030, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.046 to -0.013) and diastolic blood pressure (Coef = -0.045, 95% CI = -0.070 to -0.019), increased respiratory rate (Coef = 0.176, 95% CI = 0.112 to 0.240), and increased shock index (Coef = 4.232, 95% CI = 2.401 to 6.062) significantly influenced the SOFA score.

CONCLUSION

Increased respiratory rate and shock index were significantly correlated with disease severity in patients with sepsis. Evaluation of these signs may therefore improve early identification of severely ill patients at triage, allowing more aggressive and timely interventions to improve the prognosis of these patients.

摘要

目的

尽管人们对第五生命体征给予了很多关注,但4项经典生命体征(血压、呼吸频率、体温和心率)的效用却被忽视了。本研究的目的是评估脓毒症患者生命体征与序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分之间的可能关联。

方法

我们对206例脓毒症患者进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。患者入院时测量血压、呼吸频率、体温和心率。入院当天还确定了SOFA评分。

结果

双变量相关性分析表明,所有生命体征均与SOFA评分相关。多元回归分析表明,收缩压降低(多元回归系数[Coef]=-0.030,95%置信区间[CI]=-0.046至-0.013)、舒张压降低(Coef=-0.045,95%CI=-0.070至-0.019)、呼吸频率增加(Coef=0.176,95%CI=0.112至0.240)和休克指数增加(Coef=4.232,95%CI=2.401至6.062)对SOFA评分有显著影响。

结论

呼吸频率增加和休克指数与脓毒症患者的疾病严重程度显著相关。因此,对这些体征的评估可能会改善在分诊时对重症患者的早期识别,从而能够采取更积极、及时的干预措施来改善这些患者的预后。

相似文献

1
Importance of vital signs to the early diagnosis and severity of sepsis: association between vital signs and sequential organ failure assessment score in patients with sepsis.生命体征对脓毒症早期诊断及严重程度的重要性:脓毒症患者生命体征与序贯器官衰竭评估评分之间的关联
Intern Med. 2012;51(8):871-6. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.51.6951. Epub 2012 Apr 15.
2
Repeated vital sign measurements in the emergency department predict patient deterioration within 72 hours: a prospective observational study.急诊科反复测量生命体征可预测 72 小时内患者病情恶化:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Jul 13;26(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0525-y.
3
[Analysis of organ failure and mortality in sepsis due to secondary peritonitis].[继发性腹膜炎所致脓毒症的器官衰竭与死亡率分析]
Med Intensiva. 2013 Oct;37(7):461-7. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2012.07.010. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
4
[Combination of Weighted index of comorbidities and sepsis-related organ failure assessment score in death risk evaluation of septic patients].[合并症加权指数与脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估评分相结合在脓毒症患者死亡风险评估中的应用]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 Jan;26(1):41-5.
5
A Comparison of the Quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment Score and the National Early Warning Score in Non-ICU Patients With/Without Infection.快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分与国家早期预警评分在非 ICU 感染/非感染患者中的比较。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;46(12):1923-1933. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003359.
6
Sequential organ failure assessment score as the determinant of outcome for patients with severe sepsis.序贯器官衰竭评估评分作为严重脓毒症患者预后的决定因素
Croat Med J. 2004 Dec;45(6):715-20.
7
Frequency of vital signs monitoring and its association with mortality among adults with severe sepsis admitted to a general medical ward in Uganda.乌干达一家普通内科病房收治的严重脓毒症成年患者生命体征监测频率及其与死亡率的关联
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 28;9(2):e89879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089879. eCollection 2014.
8
Prehospital vital signs can predict pain severity: analysis using ordinal logistic regression.院前生命体征可预测疼痛严重程度:使用有序逻辑回归分析。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;18(6):334-9. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328344fdf2.
9
A simple prognostic index based on admission vital signs data among patients with sepsis in a resource-limited setting.一种基于资源有限环境下脓毒症患者入院生命体征数据的简易预后指数。
Crit Care. 2015 Mar 16;19(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0826-8.
10
[How I read vital signs?].[我如何读取生命体征?]
Rev Med Brux. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):190-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Sepsis and Septic Shock During Pregnancy and Postpartum.妊娠期和产后的脓毒症及脓毒性休克
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jun 26;146(2):207-222. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005991.
2
The Organization of Vital Signs for Pattern Recognition.用于模式识别的生命体征组织。
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Nov 28;35(1):487-495. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02207-5. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Impact on Patient Outcomes of Continuous Vital Sign Monitoring on Medical Wards: Propensity-Matched Analysis.内科病房持续生命体征监测对患者预后的影响:倾向匹配分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 11;27:e66347. doi: 10.2196/66347.
4
The use of successive systolic differences in photoplethysmographic (PPG) signals for respiratory rate estimation.利用光电容积脉搏波描记(PPG)信号中的连续收缩压差值来估计呼吸频率。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 8;10(4):e26036. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26036. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
5
A transformer-based diffusion probabilistic model for heart rate and blood pressure forecasting in Intensive Care Unit.一种基于变压器的重症监护病房心率和血压预测扩散概率模型。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024 Apr;246:108060. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108060. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
6
Evaluation of Sepsis-1 and Sepsis-3 Diagnostic Criteria in Patients with Sepsis in Intensive Care Unit.评估 ICU 中脓毒症患者的 Sepsis-1 和 Sepsis-3 诊断标准。
J Healthc Eng. 2023 Jul 7;2023:3794886. doi: 10.1155/2023/3794886. eCollection 2023.
7
Transferability and interpretability of the sepsis prediction models in the intensive care unit.在重症监护病房中,脓毒症预测模型的可转移性和可解释性。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Dec 29;22(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02090-3.
8
Advanced Triage Protocol: The Role of an Automated Lactate Order in Expediting Rapid Identification of Patients at Risk of Sepsis in the Emergency Department.高级分诊方案:急诊自动乳酸检测医嘱在加速识别脓毒症风险患者中的作用
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Aug 19;4(8):e0736. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000736. eCollection 2022 Aug.
9
Outcomes of Vital Sign Monitoring of an Acute Surgical Cohort With Wearable Sensors and Digital Alerting Systems: A Pragmatically Designed Cohort Study and Propensity-Matched Analysis.使用可穿戴传感器和数字警报系统对急性外科队列进行生命体征监测的结果:一项实用设计的队列研究和倾向匹配分析。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Jun 27;10:895973. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.895973. eCollection 2022.
10
Deep Learning Methods for Remote Heart Rate Measurement: A Review and Future Research Agenda.深度学习方法在远程心率测量中的应用:综述与未来研究议程。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Sep 20;21(18):6296. doi: 10.3390/s21186296.