• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结肠镜检查的退出时间作为质量指标 - 全国性分析。

Withdrawal time as a quality indicator for colonoscopy - a nationwide analysis.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2012 May;44(5):476-81. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1306898. Epub 2012 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1055/s-0032-1306898
PMID:22531983
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

A withdrawal time of at least 6 min has been recommended as a quality indicator for colonoscopy. One drawback of many of the studies that have investigated withdrawal time and produced conflicting results has been their single-center design involving few endoscopists. Therefore, the validity of withdrawal time as a quality measure remains unclear. This study explores the value of individual withdrawal time in a nationwide analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective cohort study comprised data from outpatient colonoscopies performed at 19 Norwegian centers from January to September 2009 and registered in the Norwegian Gastronet Quality Assurance (QA) program. The participating endoscopists were characterized by their median withdrawal time for visual colonoscopies (diagnostic colonoscopies without biopsy or therapy) and categorized into two visual withdrawal time (VWT) groups (< 6 min or ≥ 6 min) to analyze the predictive value of VWT for detection of one or more polyps ≥ 5 mm in diameter using multiple logistic regression models.

RESULTS

The study included 4429 consecutive colonoscopies performed by 67 endoscopists. The adjusted odds ratio for the detection of polyps ≥ 5 mm was 1.21 (95 %CI 0.94 - 1.56, P = 0.14) for endoscopists with a median VWT ≥ 6 min compared with endoscopists with a median VWT < 6 min.

CONCLUSION

Withdrawal time using 6 min as the threshold is not a strong predictor of the likelihood of finding a polyp during colonoscopy and should not be used as a quality indicator.

摘要

背景和研究目的

至少 6 分钟的退镜时间已被推荐为结肠镜检查的质量指标。许多研究调查退镜时间并得出相互矛盾的结果,其缺点之一是它们的单中心设计涉及的内镜医生较少。因此,退镜时间作为一种质量衡量标准的有效性仍不清楚。本研究在全国范围内分析中探讨了个体退镜时间的价值。

患者和方法

这项前瞻性队列研究包括 2009 年 1 月至 9 月在 19 个挪威中心进行的门诊结肠镜检查数据,并在挪威 Gastronet 质量保证 (QA) 计划中进行了登记。参与的内镜医生以其进行目视结肠镜检查(无活检或治疗的诊断性结肠镜检查)的中位退镜时间为特征,并分为两个视觉退镜时间 (VWT) 组(<6 分钟或≥6 分钟),以使用多个逻辑回归模型分析 VWT 对检测一个或多个直径≥5mm 的息肉的预测价值。

结果

该研究包括 67 名内镜医生连续进行的 4429 例结肠镜检查。与中位 VWT<6 分钟的内镜医生相比,中位 VWT≥6 分钟的内镜医生检测直径≥5mm 的息肉的调整优势比为 1.21(95%CI 0.94-1.56,P=0.14)。

结论

以 6 分钟作为阈值的退镜时间并不是结肠镜检查中发现息肉可能性的有力预测指标,不应作为质量指标使用。

相似文献

1
Withdrawal time as a quality indicator for colonoscopy - a nationwide analysis.结肠镜检查的退出时间作为质量指标 - 全国性分析。
Endoscopy. 2012 May;44(5):476-81. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1306898. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
2
Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time.内镜医师退镜速度对息肉检出率的影响:对优化结肠镜检查退镜时间的启示
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Sep 15;24(6):965-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03080.x.
3
Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes on polyp detection.全院范围内结肠镜检查退镜时间≥7分钟的政策对息肉检出的影响。
Gastroenterology. 2008 Dec;135(6):1892-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.024. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
4
Withdrawal times and associated factors in colonoscopy: a quality assurance multicenter assessment.结肠镜检查的退出时间及其相关因素:一项质量保证多中心评估。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Apr;44(4):e80-6. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181bf9b02.
5
[Quality indicators for colonoscopy: differences in polyp detection between endoscopists at one hospital].[结肠镜检查的质量指标:一家医院内镜医师之间息肉检出率的差异]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2012;156(24):A4219.
6
Variable detection of nonadenomatous polyps by individual endoscopists at colonoscopy and correlation with adenoma detection.不同内镜医师在结肠镜检查时对非腺瘤性息肉的检测差异及其与腺瘤检测的相关性
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008 Jul;42(6):704-7. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31817236e5.
7
Differences in proximal serrated polyp detection among endoscopists are associated with variability in withdrawal time.内镜医师在检测近端锯齿状息肉方面的差异与退镜时间的变化有关。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Apr;77(4):617-23. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.018. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
8
Sustaining the vitality of colonoscopy quality improvement programmes over time. Experience from the Norwegian Gastronet programme.随着时间推移维持结肠镜检查质量改进项目的活力。来自挪威胃肠网项目的经验。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010 Mar;45(3):362-9. doi: 10.3109/00365520903497106.
9
The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.录像结肠镜检查对腺瘤检出率的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jan;75(1):127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.048. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
10
Nurse endoscopists perform colonoscopies according to the international standard and with high patient satisfaction.护士内镜医师按照国际标准进行结肠镜检查,患者满意度高。
Endoscopy. 2012 Dec;44(12):1127-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1310154. Epub 2012 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving polyp detection at colonoscopy: Non-technological techniques.提高结肠镜检查中息肉的检出率:非技术方法。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 May 16;15(5):354-367. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i5.354.
2
Factors associated with lesion detection in colonoscopy among different indications.不同适应证下结肠镜检查中与病变检出相关的因素。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2022 Nov;10(9):1008-1019. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12325. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
3
Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality.结肠镜检查的质量指标:理想与现实之间的差距。
Clin Endosc. 2022 May;55(3):332-338. doi: 10.5946/ce.2022.037. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
4
Longer withdrawal time is not associated with increased patient discomfort in colonoscopy: a retrospective observational study.结肠镜检查中较长的退镜时间与患者不适增加无关:一项回顾性观察研究。
Ann Coloproctol. 2023 Feb;39(1):71-76. doi: 10.3393/ac.2021.00388.0055. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
5
Will purposely seeking detect more colorectal polyps than routine performing during colonoscopy?在结肠镜检查过程中,有意寻求检测出比常规操作更多的结直肠息肉吗?
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 16;99(42):e22738. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022738.
6
Efficacy of withdrawal time monitoring in adenoma detection with or without the aid of a full-spectrum scope.撤镜时间监测在有无全光谱内镜辅助腺瘤检测中的效果
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Sep;7(9):E1135-E1142. doi: 10.1055/a-0854-3946. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
7
Identification of cecum time-location in a colonoscopy video by deep learning analysis of colonoscope movement.通过结肠镜运动的深度学习分析识别结肠镜检查视频中盲肠的时间位置
PeerJ. 2019 Jul 29;7:e7256. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7256. eCollection 2019.
8
No Interval Cancers in Endoscopic Practice.内镜检查实践中无间隔期癌。
Curr Health Sci J. 2019 Jan-Mar;45(1):5-18. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.45.01.01. Epub 2019 Mar 31.
9
Newly-developed colonoscope (PCF-PQ260L) is useful for patients with difficult colons.新开发的结肠镜(PCF-PQ260L)对结肠病变复杂的患者很有用。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul;30(7):630-635. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2019.18789.
10
Effectiveness of digital feedback on patient experience and 30-day complications after screening colonoscopy: a randomized health services study.数字反馈对结肠镜筛查后患者体验及30天并发症的有效性:一项随机卫生服务研究。
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Apr;7(4):E537-E544. doi: 10.1055/a-0830-4648. Epub 2019 Apr 3.