Petursdottir Anna Ingeborg, Carp Charlotte L, Matthies Derek W, Esch Barbara E
Texas Christian University.
Anal Verbal Behav. 2011;27(1):45-60. doi: 10.1007/BF03393091.
Several studies have demonstrated effects of stimulus-stimulus pairing (SSP) on children's vocalizations, but numerous treatment failures have also been reported. The present study attempted to isolate procedural variables related to failures of SSP to condition speech sounds as reinforcers. Three boys diagnosed with autism-spectrum disorders participated. Phase 1 was designed to assess SSP effects on production of auditory stimuli via button pressing. When SSP failed to produce a preference for the target stimulus, we instituted a series of procedural manipulations intended to address potential reasons for failure. One participant preferred the target stimulus when given the opportunity to select preferred items for pairing prior to each session, but a subsequent reversal attempt produced ambiguous results. Two participants showed no consistent preference in Phase 1 and underwent a within-session reinforcer evaluation in Phase 2, in which alternative controlling variables were demonstrated by delivering preferred stimuli contingent on button pressing.
多项研究已证明刺激-刺激配对(SSP)对儿童发声的影响,但也有大量治疗失败的报道。本研究试图分离与SSP未能将语音作为强化物进行条件作用失败相关的程序变量。三名被诊断患有自闭症谱系障碍的男孩参与了研究。第一阶段旨在通过按键评估SSP对听觉刺激产生的影响。当SSP未能产生对目标刺激的偏好时,我们进行了一系列程序操作,旨在解决失败的潜在原因。一名参与者在每次会话前有机会选择偏好的物品进行配对时,表现出对目标刺激的偏好,但随后的反向尝试产生了不明确的结果。两名参与者在第一阶段没有表现出一致的偏好,并在第二阶段接受了会话内强化物评估,在该评估中,通过根据按键给予偏好刺激来证明替代控制变量。