Suppr超能文献

大肠杆菌核糖结合蛋白(RBP)不依赖SecB的输出:与麦芽糖结合蛋白(MBP)输出的一些比较以及对RBP-MBP杂合蛋白的研究。

SecB-independent export of Escherichia coli ribose-binding protein (RBP): some comparisons with export of maltose-binding protein (MBP) and studies with RBP-MBP hybrid proteins.

作者信息

Collier D N, Strobel S M, Bassford P J

机构信息

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7290.

出版信息

J Bacteriol. 1990 Dec;172(12):6875-84. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.12.6875-6884.1990.

Abstract

The efficient export of the Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein (MBP) is known to be SecB dependent, whereas ribose-binding protein (RBP) export is SecB independent. When the MBP and RBP signal peptides were exchanged precisely at the signal peptidase processing sites, the resultant RBP-MBP and MBP-RBP hybrid proteins both were efficiently exported in SecB+ cells. However, only MBP-RBP was efficiently exported in SecB- cells; RBP-MBP exhibited a significant export defect, a finding that was consistent with previous proposals that SecB specifically interacts with the mature moiety of precursor MBP to promote export. The relatively slow, totally posttranslational export mode exhibited by certain mutant RBP and MBP-RBP species in SecB+ cells was not affected by the loss of SecB. In contrast, MBP and RBP-MBP species with similarly altered signal peptides were totally export defective in SecB- cells. Both export-defective MBP and RBP-MBP interfered with SecB-mediated protein export by depleting cells of functional SecB. In contrast, neither export-defective RBP nor MBP-RBP elicited such an interference effect. These and other data indicated that SecB is unable to interact with precursor RBP or that any interaction between these two proteins is considerably weaker than that of SecB with precursor MBP. In addition, no correlation could be established between a SecB requirement for export and PrlA-mediated suppression of signal peptide export defects. Finally, previous studies have established that wild-type MBP export can be accomplished cotranslationally, whereas wild-type RBP export is strictly a posttranslational process. In this study, cotranslational export was not detected for either MBP-RBP or RBP-MBP. This indicates that the export mode exhibited by a given precursor protein (cotranslational versus posttranslational) is determined by properties of both the signal peptide and the mature moiety.

摘要

已知大肠杆菌麦芽糖结合蛋白(MBP)的高效输出依赖于SecB,而核糖结合蛋白(RBP)的输出则不依赖于SecB。当MBP和RBP的信号肽在信号肽酶加工位点精确交换时,产生的RBP-MBP和MBP-RBP杂合蛋白在SecB+细胞中均能高效输出。然而,只有MBP-RBP在SecB-细胞中能高效输出;RBP-MBP表现出明显的输出缺陷,这一发现与之前的观点一致,即SecB与前体MBP的成熟部分特异性相互作用以促进输出。某些突变型RBP和MBP-RBP在SecB+细胞中表现出的相对缓慢、完全翻译后输出模式不受SecB缺失的影响。相比之下,信号肽有类似改变的MBP和RBP-MBP在SecB-细胞中完全存在输出缺陷。有输出缺陷的MBP和RBP-MBP都通过耗尽细胞中的功能性SecB来干扰SecB介导的蛋白质输出。相比之下,有输出缺陷的RBP和MBP-RBP都不会引发这种干扰效应。这些以及其他数据表明,SecB无法与前体RBP相互作用,或者这两种蛋白质之间的任何相互作用都比SecB与前体MBP的相互作用弱得多。此外,在SecB对输出的需求与PrlA介导的信号肽输出缺陷抑制之间无法建立相关性。最后,之前的研究已经确定野生型MBP的输出可以在翻译过程中完成,而野生型RBP的输出严格来说是一个翻译后过程。在本研究中,未检测到MBP-RBP或RBP-MBP的翻译过程中输出。这表明给定前体蛋白所表现出的输出模式(翻译过程中与翻译后)由信号肽和成熟部分的特性共同决定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1531/210806/f5a36000bcfe/jbacter00166-0279-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验