Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Health Psychol. 2012 Jul;31(4):441-9. doi: 10.1037/a0027927. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
Parenting styles such as authoritarian, disengaged, or permissive are thought to be associated with greater adolescent obesity risk than an authoritative style. This study assessed the relationship between parenting styles and changes in body mass index (BMI) from adolescence to young adulthood.
The study included self-reported data from adolescents in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Factor mixture modeling, a data-driven approach, was used to classify participants into parenting style groups based on measures of acceptance and control. Latent growth modeling (LGM) identified patterns of developmental changes in BMI. After a number of potential confounders were controlled for, parenting style variables were entered as predictors of BMI trajectories. Analyses were also conducted for male and female individuals of 3 racial-ethnic groups (Hispanic, black, white) to assess whether parenting styles were differentially associated with BMI trajectories in these 6 groups.
Parenting styles were classified into 4 groups: authoritarian, disengaged, permissive, and balanced. Compared with the balanced parenting style, authoritarian and disengaged parenting styles were associated with a less steep average BMI increase (linear slope) over time, but also less leveling off (quadratic) of BMI over time. Differences in BMI trajectories were observed for various genders and races, but the differences did not reach statistical significance.
Adolescents who reported having parents with authoritarian or disengaged parenting styles had greater increases in BMI as they transitioned to young adulthood despite having a lower BMI trajectory through adolescence.
与权威型教养风格相比,专制型、放任型或忽视型教养方式被认为与青少年肥胖风险增加有关。本研究评估了教养方式与青少年到成年早期体重指数(BMI)变化之间的关系。
该研究纳入了来自青少年健康纵向研究的青少年自我报告数据。因子混合建模是一种数据驱动的方法,用于根据接受和控制措施将参与者分为教养方式群体。潜在增长模型(LGM)确定了 BMI 发展变化的模式。在控制了许多潜在的混杂因素后,将教养方式变量作为 BMI 轨迹的预测因子输入。还对 3 个种族群体(西班牙裔、黑人、白人)的男性和女性个体进行了分析,以评估教养方式是否与这 6 个群体的 BMI 轨迹存在差异关联。
教养方式分为 4 组:专制型、放任型、忽视型和平衡型。与平衡型教养方式相比,专制型和放任型教养方式与 BMI 随时间增加的斜率(线性斜率)变缓有关,但 BMI 随时间的平稳程度(二次)也较低。不同性别和种族的 BMI 轨迹存在差异,但差异无统计学意义。
尽管青少年在青春期的 BMI 轨迹较低,但报告父母有专制或放任教养方式的青少年在向成年早期过渡时 BMI 增加幅度更大。