Suppr超能文献

养老院的护理质量和临终质量:两个测量模型。

Quality of care and quality of dying in nursing homes: two measurement models.

机构信息

College of Nursing, University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska 68198-5330, USA.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2012 Jun;15(6):690-5. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0497. Epub 2012 May 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is consistent evidence of significant variation in the quality of end-of-life care among nursing homes, with many facilities ill-prepared to provide optimal physical and psychological care that is culturally sensitive and respectful of the needs and preferences of residents and their family members. There is continued evidence that what is impeding efforts to improve care is that most measurement tools are hampered by a lack of distinction between quality of care and quality of dying as well as a lack of complete psychometric evaluation. Further, health services researchers cite the need to include "system-level" factors, variables that reflect leadership, culture, or informal practices, all of which influence end-of-life care and can be used to differentiate one setting from another. The purpose of this article is to report advancement in conceptualizing quality end-of-life care in nursing homes and to offer a refined approach to measurement.

METHODS

Two latent constructs are tested: quality of care (composed of system-level factors) and quality of dying (comprised of resident/family outcomes). Data obtained from 85 Midwestern nursing homes and 1282 interviews with bereaved family members were used to evaluate both constructs.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted and evidence of validity and reliability were obtained for both.

CONCLUSION

For health services researchers, expanded models that include system-level factors as well as more comprehensive and psychometrically sound models of resident outcomes stand to inform efforts to improve care in this very important area.

摘要

背景

养老院临终关怀的质量存在显著差异,这已经是确凿无疑的了,许多机构在提供文化敏感且尊重居民及其家属的需求和偏好的优质身心关怀方面准备不足。有持续的证据表明,阻碍改善护理的原因是,大多数衡量工具都受到缺乏对护理质量和临终质量的区分以及缺乏完整的心理测量评估的限制。此外,卫生服务研究人员还指出,需要纳入“系统层面”的因素,这些变量反映了领导力、文化或非正式实践,所有这些都影响临终关怀,可以用来区分一个环境与另一个环境。本文的目的是报告在概念化养老院临终关怀质量方面的进展,并提供一种改进的衡量方法。

方法

测试了两个潜在的结构:护理质量(由系统层面的因素组成)和临终质量(由居民/家庭的结果组成)。从中西部 85 家养老院和 1282 名丧亲家属的访谈中获得的数据用于评估这两个结构。

结果

进行了验证性因子分析,并对两者都获得了有效性和可靠性的证据。

结论

对于卫生服务研究人员来说,扩大模型,纳入系统层面的因素,以及更全面和心理测量上健全的居民结果模型,有望为改善这一非常重要领域的护理提供信息。

相似文献

2
Needs of the dying in nursing homes.养老院中临终者的需求。
J Palliat Med. 2002 Dec;5(6):895-901. doi: 10.1089/10966210260499087.
3
A measure of palliative care in nursing homes.养老院姑息治疗的一项衡量指标。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jan;41(1):57-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.03.016. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
10
Nursing homes and end-of-life care in Japan.日本的养老院和临终关怀。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Oct;14(10):718-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Apr 3.

本文引用的文献

3
Strategies and innovative models for delivering palliative care in nursing homes.养老院提供姑息治疗的策略和创新模式。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011 Feb;12(2):91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.07.016. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
5
The growth of hospice care in U.S. nursing homes.美国养老院临终关怀的发展。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Aug;58(8):1481-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02968.x. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
7
The influence of nursing home culture on the use of feeding tubes.养老院文化对饲管使用的影响。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jan 11;170(1):83-8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.467.
8
Raising the standard: palliative care in nursing homes.提高标准:养老院的姑息治疗。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):136-40. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0912.
9
Hospice care in the nursing home setting: a review of the literature.养老院环境中的临终关怀:文献综述
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Sep;38(3):440-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.05.006.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验