Genetic Epidemiology Unit, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia.
Behav Genet. 2012 Sep;42(5):722-31. doi: 10.1007/s10519-012-9540-3. Epub 2012 May 3.
Research on the genetic influences on different abstract reasoning skills (fluid intelligence) and their interrelation (especially in childhood/adolescence) has been sparse. A novel cognitive test battery, the Verbal and Spatial Reasoning test for Children (VESPARCH 1), consisting of four matched (in terms of test-procedure and design) subtests assessing verbal [analogical (VA) and categorical (VC)] and spatial [analogical (SA) and categorical (SC)] reasoning, was administered to a population based sample of 12-year old twins (169 pairs). Multivariate analysis was conducted to explore the genetic relationship between the four cognitive sub-domains. Heritabilities were 0.62 (VA), 0.49 (VC), 0.52 (SA), and 0.20 (SC). Genetic influences were due to one common factor with no specific genetic influences. This shared genetic factor also explained almost the entire covariance between the domains, as environmental variance was largely specific to each subtest. The finding of no genetic influences specific to each subtest may be due to the uniquely matched design of the VESPARCH 1, reducing confoundment of different test modalities used in conventional tests. For future research or when interpreting previous studies, our findings highlight the importance of taking such potential artefacts (i.e. different test modalities for different sub-domains) into account when exploring the relationship between cognitive sub-domains.
关于不同抽象推理技能(流体智力)的遗传影响及其相互关系(尤其是在儿童期和青少年期)的研究一直很少。一种新的认知测试组合,即儿童言语和空间推理测试(VESPARCH 1),由四个匹配(在测试程序和设计方面)的子测试组成,评估言语[类比(VA)和范畴(VC)]和空间[类比(SA)和范畴(SC)]推理。该测试在基于人群的 12 岁双胞胎(169 对)样本中进行。采用多变量分析来探索四个认知子领域之间的遗传关系。遗传率分别为 0.62(VA)、0.49(VC)、0.52(SA)和 0.20(SC)。遗传影响是由一个共同因素引起的,没有特定的遗传影响。这个共同的遗传因素也解释了各领域之间几乎全部的协方差,因为环境方差在很大程度上是特定于每个子测试的。没有特定于每个子测试的遗传影响的发现可能是由于 VESPARCH 1 的独特匹配设计,减少了传统测试中使用的不同测试模式的混淆。对于未来的研究或解释以前的研究,我们的发现强调了在探索认知子领域之间的关系时,考虑到这种潜在的人为因素(即不同的测试模式用于不同的子领域)的重要性。