Fiedler Nora, Sommer Friederike, Leuschner Vincenz, Ahlig Nadine, Göbel Kristin, Scheithauer Herbert
Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Police and Security Management, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Berlin, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 24;11:1592. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01592. eCollection 2020.
Warning behavior prior to an act of severe targeted school violence was often not recognized by peers and school staff. With regard to preventive efforts, we attempted to identify barriers to information exchange in German schools and understand mechanisms that influenced the recognition, evaluation, and reporting of warning behavior through a teacher or peer. Our analysis is based on inquiry files from 11 cases of German school shootings that were obtained during the 3-year research project "Incident and case analysis of highly expressive targeted violence (TARGET)." We conducted a qualitative retrospective case study to analyze witness reports from school staff and peers. Our results point to subjective explanations used by teachers and peers toward conspicuous behavior (e.g., situational framing and typical adolescent behavior), as well as reassuring factors that indicated harmlessness (e.g., no access to a weapon). Additionally, we found organizational barriers similar to those described in US-American case studies (e.g., organizational deviance).
严重的针对性校园暴力行为发生之前的警示行为往往未被同伴和学校工作人员所识别。在预防工作方面,我们试图找出德国学校信息交流的障碍,并通过教师或同伴了解影响警示行为识别、评估和报告的机制。我们的分析基于在为期三年的“高度表达性针对性暴力事件及案例分析(TARGET)”研究项目中获取的11起德国校园枪击案的询问档案。我们进行了一项定性回顾性案例研究,以分析学校工作人员和同伴的证人报告。我们的结果指出了教师和同伴对明显行为的主观解释(如情境框架和典型的青少年行为),以及表明无害的安心因素(如无法获取武器)。此外,我们发现了与美国案例研究中所描述的类似的组织障碍(如组织偏差)。