Suppr超能文献

前列腺癌大分割放疗方案中射波刀放射治疗剂量递送的等效归一化总剂量估计值。

Equivalent normalized total dose estimates in cyberknife radiotherapy dose delivery in prostate cancer hypofractionation regimens.

作者信息

Sudahar H, Kurup P G G, Murali V, Mahadev P, Velmurugan J

机构信息

Department of Radiotherapy, Apollo Speciality Hospital, Chennai, India.

出版信息

J Med Phys. 2012 Apr;37(2):90-6. doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.94743.

Abstract

As the α/β value of prostate is very small and lower than the surrounding critical organs, hypofractionated radiotherapy became a vital mode of treatment of prostate cancer. Cyberknife (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) treatment for localized prostate cancer is performed in hypofractionated dose regimen alone. Effective dose escalation in the hypofractionated regimen can be estimated if the corresponding conventional 2 Gy per fraction equivalent normalized total dose (NTD) distribution is known. The present study aims to analyze the hypofractionated dose distribution of localized prostate cancer in terms of equivalent NTD. Randomly selected 12 localized prostate cases treated in cyberknife with a dose regimen of 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions were considered. The 2 Gy per fraction equivalent NTDs were calculated using the formula derived from the linear quadratic (LQ) model. Dose distributions were analyzed with the corresponding NTDs. The conformity index for the prescribed target dose of 36.25 Gy equivalent to the NTD dose of 90.63 Gy (α/β = 1.5) or 74.31 Gy (α/β = 3) was ranging between 1.15 and 1.73 with a mean value of 1.32 ± 0.15. The D5% of the target was 111.41 ± 8.66 Gy for α/β = 1.5 and 90.15 ± 6.57 Gy for α/β = 3. Similarly, the D95% was 91.98 ± 3.77 Gy for α/β = 1.5 and 75.35 ± 2.88 Gy for α/β = 3. The mean values of bladder and rectal volume receiving the prescribed dose of 36.25 Gy were 0.83 cm3 and 0.086 cm3, respectively. NTD dose analysis shows an escalated dose distribution within the target for low α/β (1.5 Gy) with reasonable sparing of organs at risk. However, the higher α/β of prostate (3 Gy) is not encouraging the fact of dose escalation in cyberknife hypofractionated dose regimen of localized prostate cancer.

摘要

由于前列腺的α/β值非常小且低于周围关键器官,大分割放疗成为前列腺癌的一种重要治疗方式。射波刀(美国加利福尼亚州森尼韦尔市的Accuray公司)治疗局限性前列腺癌仅采用大分割剂量方案。如果已知相应的常规每次2 Gy等效归一化总剂量(NTD)分布,就可以估计大分割方案中的有效剂量递增情况。本研究旨在根据等效NTD分析局限性前列腺癌的大分割剂量分布。考虑随机选取12例接受射波刀治疗的局限性前列腺病例,其剂量方案为5次分割,总剂量36.25 Gy。使用从线性二次(LQ)模型推导的公式计算每次2 Gy等效NTD。用相应的NTD分析剂量分布。对于相当于90.63 Gy(α/β = 1.5)或74.31 Gy(α/β = 3)的NTD剂量的36.25 Gy规定靶剂量,适形指数在1.15至1.73之间,平均值为1.32±0.15。对于α/β = 1.5,靶区D5%为111.41±8.66 Gy,对于α/β = 3,靶区D5%为90.15±6.57 Gy。同样,对于α/β = 1.5,D95%为91.98±3.77 Gy,对于α/β = 3,D95%为75.35±2.88 Gy。接受36.25 Gy规定剂量的膀胱和直肠体积平均值分别为0.83 cm³和0.086 cm³。NTD剂量分析显示,对于低α/β(1.5 Gy)情况,靶区内剂量递增,同时对危及器官有合理的剂量 sparing。然而,前列腺较高的α/β值(3 Gy)并不支持局限性前列腺癌射波刀大分割剂量方案中剂量递增这一事实。 (注:最后一句“sparing”可能有误,推测原文是“sparing”,意为“ sparing 剂量 sparing ,即剂量 sparing 保护,这里可能是说对危及器官有合理的剂量保护,但原词可能使用错误,暂按此翻译)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40d8/3339148/77b18e6a1c88/JMP-37-90-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验