Schiller Anne, Großjohann Beatrice, Welk Alexander, Hübner Nils-Olaf, Braun Dagmar, Assadian Ojan, Kramer Axel
Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Germany.
GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip. 2012;7(1):Doc07. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000191. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
The aim of the present study was to determine the antimicrobial effect of various gel formulations on plaque formation; different tooth gels were compared to a toothpaste containing comparable antimicrobial ingredients with regard to its microbiocidal activity. The study was conducted under the assumption, that a chief requirement for the prevention of plaque formation is the combination of mechanical removal and antimicrobial activity, and not the sole capability of mechanical plaque removal.
Ledermix(®) fluoride gel as commercially available with preservative, and without preservative and perfume oils, Elmex(®) gelée, and Meridol(®) toothpaste were tested in a standardized in-vitro test modification of the quantitative suspension test EN 1040. Instead of testing in a suspension, the respective product was directly placed on a standardized contaminated sterile stainless steel disk without adding any bio-burden. 50% egg yolk in Aqua dest. was used as a neutralizer.
Within 1 min, Elmex(®) gelée showed a RF >5 log(10) against S. pyogenes and S. sanguinis. Against S. mutans, a log(10) RF of ≥5 was achieved after 2 min, against C. albicans after 5 min, and against P. aeruginosa after 10 min S. aureus was the most difficult organisms to be reduced. After an application time of 10 min, only a log(10) RF of 2.4 was achieved. Ledermix exceeded the antimicrobial efficacy of Elmex(®) gelée against S. mutans and C. albicans and was already effective against these organisms after 1 min, but did not show the same antimicrobial efficacy as Elmex(®) gelée against P. aeruginosa. Similar to Elmex(®) gelée, a required reduction of >5 log(10) for antimicrobials under no organic challenge was not achieved against S. aureus. Ledermix(®) fluoride gel without preservatives and Ledermix(®) fluoride gel without preservatives and perfume oil did not show the antimicrobial efficacy of the standard Ledermix(®) fluoride gel formulation, indicating that the observed antimicrobial efficacy is chiefly based on the preservative, and possibly the perfume oil. Compared to the tested gels, Meridol(®) toothpaste was less effective and reached any antimicrobial effect >5 log(10) only against S. sanguinis after 10 min.
All unmodified tested gels showed an antimicrobial effect. Because no relevant antimicrobial efficacy against plaque forming bacteria was achieved within 2 min, in practice, an anti-plaque forming effect based on the antimicrobial action of gels cannot be assumed when used in the oral cavity. However, the results of the present study indicate that the antimicrobial efficacy of gels is determined by their formulation and that for the prevention of plaque formation the combination of mechanical removal and antimicrobial activity is not the chief requirement only, but a sustained antimicrobial effect may be of greater importance.
本研究的目的是确定各种凝胶制剂对牙菌斑形成的抗菌作用;将不同的牙齿凝胶与含有类似抗菌成分的牙膏在杀菌活性方面进行比较。本研究是在这样的假设下进行的,即预防牙菌斑形成的主要要求是机械清除和抗菌活性的结合,而不仅仅是机械清除牙菌斑的能力。
在对定量悬浮试验EN 1040进行标准化体外试验改进中,测试了含有防腐剂、不含防腐剂和香料油的市售含氟Ledermix凝胶、Elmex凝胶和Meridol牙膏。不是在悬浮液中进行测试,而是将各自的产品直接放置在标准化污染的无菌不锈钢盘上,不添加任何生物负荷。去离子水中50%的蛋黄用作中和剂。
在1分钟内,Elmex凝胶对化脓性链球菌和血链球菌的杀菌率(RF)>5 log₁₀。对变形链球菌,2分钟后达到log₁₀ RF≥5,对白色念珠菌5分钟后达到,对铜绿假单胞菌10分钟后达到。金黄色葡萄球菌是最难被减少的微生物。在作用10分钟后,仅达到log₁₀ RF 2.4。Ledermix对变形链球菌和白色念珠菌的抗菌效果超过了Elmex凝胶,且在1分钟后就对这些微生物有效,但对铜绿假单胞菌的抗菌效果不如Elmex凝胶。与Elmex凝胶类似,在无有机挑战下,针对金黄色葡萄球菌未实现抗菌剂所需的>5 log₁₀的减少。不含防腐剂的Ledermix含氟凝胶和不含防腐剂及香料油的Ledermix含氟凝胶未显示出标准Ledermix含氟凝胶制剂的抗菌效果,表明观察到的抗菌效果主要基于防腐剂,可能还有香料油。与测试的凝胶相比,Meridol牙膏效果较差,仅在10分钟后对血链球菌达到>5 log₁₀的任何抗菌效果。
所有未经改性的测试凝胶均显示出抗菌作用。由于在2分钟内未对形成牙菌斑的细菌实现相关抗菌效果,因此在实际应用中,当在口腔中使用时,不能假定基于凝胶抗菌作用的抗牙菌斑形成效果。然而,本研究结果表明,凝胶的抗菌效果由其配方决定,并且对于预防牙菌斑形成,机械清除和抗菌活性的结合不仅不是主要要求,而且持续的抗菌效果可能更重要。