Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5247, and Université Montpellier 1 et 2, Faculté de Pharmacie, Institut des Biomolécules Max Mousseron, 34093 Montpellier Cedex 05, France.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 22;109(21):8304-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1119881109. Epub 2012 May 9.
The dynamic character of G protein-coupled receptors is essential to their function. However, the details of how ligands stabilize a particular conformation to selectively activate a signaling pathway and how signaling proteins affect this conformational repertoire remain unclear. Using a prototypical peptide-activated class A G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), the ghrelin receptor, reconstituted as a monomer into lipid discs and labeled with a fluorescent conformational reporter, we demonstrate that ligand efficacy and functional selectivity are directly related to different receptor conformations. Of importance, our data bring direct evidence that distinct effector proteins affect the conformational landscape of the ghrelin receptor in different ways. Whereas G proteins affect the balance between active and inactive receptor substates in favor of the active state, agonist-induced arrestin recruitment is accompanied by a marked change in the structural features of the receptor that adopt a conformation different from that observed in the absence of arrestin. In contrast to G proteins and arrestins, μ-AP2 has no significant effect on the organization of the transmembrane core of the receptor. Such a modulation of a GPCR conformational landscape by pharmacologically distinct ligands and effectors provides insights into the structural bases that decisively affect ligand efficacy and subsequent biological responses. This is also likely to have major implications for the design of drugs activating specific GPCR-associated signaling pathways.
G 蛋白偶联受体的动态特性对其功能至关重要。然而,配体如何稳定特定构象以选择性激活信号通路,以及信号蛋白如何影响这种构象范围,这些细节仍不清楚。我们使用重组为单体的典型肽激活的 A 类 G 蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)——胃饥饿素受体,将其标记上荧光构象报告分子,然后重新构建到脂质片中。我们证明了配体的效力和功能选择性与不同的受体构象直接相关。重要的是,我们的数据提供了直接证据,证明不同的效应蛋白以不同的方式影响胃饥饿素受体的构象景观。虽然 G 蛋白影响活性和非活性受体亚基之间的平衡,有利于活性状态,但激动剂诱导的 arrestin 募集伴随着受体结构特征的明显变化,其构象与没有 arrestin 时观察到的构象不同。与 G 蛋白和 arrestin 不同,μ-AP2 对受体跨膜核心的组织没有显著影响。这种由药理学上不同的配体和效应物对 GPCR 构象景观的调节,提供了对决定配体效力和随后生物反应的结构基础的深入了解。这也可能对设计激活特定 GPCR 相关信号通路的药物产生重大影响。