Department of Physiology, Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Cardenal Herrera - CEU, Elche, Spain.
Br J Nutr. 2012 Jun;107 Suppl 2:S3-7. doi: 10.1017/S0007114512001432.
The objective of this study is to establish a methodological proposal in order to carry out qualitative systematic reviews and apply these findings to a review of Omega-3 Fatty Acids with respect to health and illness. Based on a methodological proposal, a general protocol was developed to provide a sound basis for the preparation of the reviews in this journal supplement. A systematic technique was proposed in order to revise the existing scientific literature on Omega-3 Fatty Acids, with particular emphasis on aspects relating to health and illness. The aim of qualitative systematic reviews is to collate and summarise the results of the primary studies reviewed which will be carried out through a descriptive synthesis. It can be concluded that systematic reviews provide a summary of the existing primary documents on a specific scientific question. The detailed and explicit methods used lead to the identification, critical evaluation and synthesis of the scientific literature. Furthermore, both bias and random effects are reduced, resulting in more reliable data from which to draw conclusions and make recommendations to support decision-making.
本研究的目的是建立一种方法学提案,以便进行定性系统评价,并将这些发现应用于对 Omega-3 脂肪酸与健康和疾病的评价。基于方法学提案,制定了一般方案,为该期刊增刊中进行的评价提供了坚实的基础。提出了一种系统技术,以便修订现有的关于 Omega-3 脂肪酸的科学文献,特别强调与健康和疾病相关的方面。定性系统评价的目的是整理和总结所审查的主要研究的结果,这将通过描述性综合来进行。可以得出结论,系统评价提供了对特定科学问题现有主要文件的总结。所使用的详细和明确的方法导致了科学文献的识别、批判性评价和综合。此外,还降低了偏差和随机效应,从而获得了更可靠的数据,以便从中得出结论并提出建议,以支持决策。